* [PATCH v4 0/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Support TJA1048/TJA1051
@ 2025-09-01 3:18 Peng Fan
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document NXP TJA105X/1048 Peng Fan
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2025-09-01 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Vinod Koul,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Aswath Govindraju, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Frank Li, Haibo Chen
Cc: linux-can, linux-phy, devicetree, linux-kernel, imx,
linux-arm-kernel, Peng Fan, Frank Li
TJA1048 is a Dual channel can transceiver with Sleep mode supported.
TJA1051 is a Single Channel can transceiver with Sleep mode supported.
To support them:
patch 1: add binding doc
patch 2/3: To support dual channel,
- Introduce new flag CAN_TRANSCEIVER_DUAL_CH to indicate the phy
has two channels.
- Introduce can_transceiver_priv as a higher level encapsulation for
phy, mux_state, num_ch.
- Alloc a phy for each channel
patch 4,5,6: Update dts to use phys
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
Changes in v4:
- Add R-b from Frank for patch 1, 2, 3, 6
- Address the minor comments from Frank regarding min/maxItems, commit
log
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250829-can-v3-0-3b2f34094f59@nxp.com
Changes in v3:
- Patch 1: Add TJA1057, update #phy-cells
- Patch 2,3: Separate patch 2 into two patches per Frank, 1st introduce
can_transceiver_priv, 2nd support dual chan by adding num_ch
- Patch 6: Change to 5Mbps rate
- Patch 4,5: Add R-b from Frank
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250825-can-v2-0-c461e9fcbc14@nxp.com
Changes in v2:
- Update standby-gpios constraints per Conor's comments
- Drop patch 2 which is not needed.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250822-can-v1-0-c075f702adea@nxp.com
---
Peng Fan (6):
dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document NXP TJA105X/1048
phy: phy-can-transceiver: Introduce can_transceiver_priv
phy: phy-can-transceiver: Add dual channel support for TJA1048
arm64: dts: imx95-15x15-evk: Use phys to replace xceiver-supply
arm64: dts: imx8mp-evk: Use phys to replace xceiver-supply
arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: Use phys to replace xceiver-supply
.../devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml | 30 +++++-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-evk.dts | 43 +++-----
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts | 17 ++-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-15x15-evk.dts | 13 ++-
drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c | 120 +++++++++++++++------
5 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 6aea185bfe693f3b373488217c198d2c3daed6eb
change-id: 20250821-can-c832cb4f0323
Best regards,
--
Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document NXP TJA105X/1048
2025-09-01 3:18 [PATCH v4 0/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Support TJA1048/TJA1051 Peng Fan
@ 2025-09-01 3:18 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-01 18:54 ` Conor Dooley
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Introduce can_transceiver_priv Peng Fan
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2025-09-01 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Vinod Koul,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Aswath Govindraju, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Frank Li, Haibo Chen
Cc: linux-can, linux-phy, devicetree, linux-kernel, imx,
linux-arm-kernel, Peng Fan, Frank Li
The TJA105[1,7] is a high-speed CAN transceiver which is a pin-compatible
alternative for TI TCAN1043 with sleep mode supported, and has a compatible
programming model, therefore use ti,tcan1043 as fallback compatible.
The TJA1048 is a dual high-speed CAN transceiver with sleep mode supported.
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
index 4a8c3829d85d3c4a4963750d03567c1c345beb91..f8e0c24856a2ba83b5c988b246464f47e11a032f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
@@ -19,18 +19,25 @@ properties:
- enum:
- microchip,ata6561
- const: ti,tcan1042
+ - items:
+ - enum:
+ - nxp,tja1051
+ - nxp,tja1057
+ - const: ti,tcan1043
- enum:
- ti,tcan1042
- ti,tcan1043
+ - nxp,tja1048
- nxp,tjr1443
'#phy-cells':
- const: 0
+ enum: [0, 1]
standby-gpios:
description:
gpio node to toggle standby signal on transceiver
- maxItems: 1
+ minItems: 1
+ maxItems: 2
enable-gpios:
description:
@@ -53,6 +60,25 @@ required:
- compatible
- '#phy-cells'
+allOf:
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ const: nxp,tja1048
+ then:
+ properties:
+ '#phy-cells':
+ const: 1
+ standby-gpios:
+ minItems: 2
+ else:
+ properties:
+ '#phy-cells':
+ const: 0
+ standby-gpios:
+ maxItems: 1
+
additionalProperties: false
examples:
--
2.37.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Introduce can_transceiver_priv
2025-09-01 3:18 [PATCH v4 0/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Support TJA1048/TJA1051 Peng Fan
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document NXP TJA105X/1048 Peng Fan
@ 2025-09-01 3:18 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Add dual channel support for TJA1048 Peng Fan
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2025-09-01 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Vinod Koul,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Aswath Govindraju, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Frank Li, Haibo Chen
Cc: linux-can, linux-phy, devicetree, linux-kernel, imx,
linux-arm-kernel, Peng Fan, Frank Li
To prepare for dual-channel phy support, introduce can_transceiver_priv as
a higher level encapsulation for phy and mux_state.
No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c b/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
index f59caff4b3d4c267feca4220bf1547b6fad08f95..6415c6af0e8414a6cc8d15958a17ee749a3f28e9 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
@@ -23,6 +23,11 @@ struct can_transceiver_phy {
struct phy *generic_phy;
struct gpio_desc *standby_gpio;
struct gpio_desc *enable_gpio;
+ struct can_transceiver_priv *priv;
+};
+
+struct can_transceiver_priv {
+ struct can_transceiver_phy *can_transceiver_phy;
struct mux_state *mux_state;
};
@@ -32,8 +37,8 @@ static int can_transceiver_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
struct can_transceiver_phy *can_transceiver_phy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
int ret;
- if (can_transceiver_phy->mux_state) {
- ret = mux_state_select(can_transceiver_phy->mux_state);
+ if (can_transceiver_phy->priv->mux_state) {
+ ret = mux_state_select(can_transceiver_phy->priv->mux_state);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&phy->dev, "Failed to select CAN mux: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
@@ -56,8 +61,8 @@ static int can_transceiver_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
gpiod_set_value_cansleep(can_transceiver_phy->standby_gpio, 1);
if (can_transceiver_phy->enable_gpio)
gpiod_set_value_cansleep(can_transceiver_phy->enable_gpio, 0);
- if (can_transceiver_phy->mux_state)
- mux_state_deselect(can_transceiver_phy->mux_state);
+ if (can_transceiver_phy->priv->mux_state)
+ mux_state_deselect(can_transceiver_phy->priv->mux_state);
return 0;
}
@@ -107,7 +112,7 @@ static int can_transceiver_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
- struct can_transceiver_phy *can_transceiver_phy;
+ struct can_transceiver_priv *priv;
const struct can_transceiver_data *drvdata;
const struct of_device_id *match;
struct phy *phy;
@@ -117,18 +122,25 @@ static int can_transceiver_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
u32 max_bitrate = 0;
int err;
- can_transceiver_phy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct can_transceiver_phy), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!can_transceiver_phy)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
match = of_match_node(can_transceiver_phy_ids, pdev->dev.of_node);
drvdata = match->data;
+ priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct can_transceiver_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!priv)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
+
+ priv->can_transceiver_phy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct can_transceiver_phy),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!priv->can_transceiver_phy)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
mux_state = devm_mux_state_get_optional(dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(mux_state))
return PTR_ERR(mux_state);
- can_transceiver_phy->mux_state = mux_state;
+ priv->mux_state = mux_state;
phy = devm_phy_create(dev, dev->of_node,
&can_transceiver_phy_ops);
@@ -142,23 +154,24 @@ static int can_transceiver_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_warn(dev, "Invalid value for transceiver max bitrate. Ignoring bitrate limit\n");
phy->attrs.max_link_rate = max_bitrate;
- can_transceiver_phy->generic_phy = phy;
+ priv->can_transceiver_phy->generic_phy = phy;
+ priv->can_transceiver_phy->priv = priv;
if (drvdata->flags & CAN_TRANSCEIVER_STB_PRESENT) {
standby_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "standby", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
if (IS_ERR(standby_gpio))
return PTR_ERR(standby_gpio);
- can_transceiver_phy->standby_gpio = standby_gpio;
+ priv->can_transceiver_phy->standby_gpio = standby_gpio;
}
if (drvdata->flags & CAN_TRANSCEIVER_EN_PRESENT) {
enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
if (IS_ERR(enable_gpio))
return PTR_ERR(enable_gpio);
- can_transceiver_phy->enable_gpio = enable_gpio;
+ priv->can_transceiver_phy->enable_gpio = enable_gpio;
}
- phy_set_drvdata(can_transceiver_phy->generic_phy, can_transceiver_phy);
+ phy_set_drvdata(priv->can_transceiver_phy->generic_phy, priv->can_transceiver_phy);
phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate);
--
2.37.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Add dual channel support for TJA1048
2025-09-01 3:18 [PATCH v4 0/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Support TJA1048/TJA1051 Peng Fan
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document NXP TJA105X/1048 Peng Fan
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Introduce can_transceiver_priv Peng Fan
@ 2025-09-01 3:18 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] arm64: dts: imx95-15x15-evk: Use phys to replace xceiver-supply Peng Fan
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2025-09-01 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Vinod Koul,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Aswath Govindraju, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Frank Li, Haibo Chen
Cc: linux-can, linux-phy, devicetree, linux-kernel, imx,
linux-arm-kernel, Peng Fan, Frank Li
- Introduce new flag CAN_TRANSCEIVER_DUAL_CH to indicate the phy has two
channels.
- Alloc a phy for each channel
- Support TJA1048 which is a dual high-speed CAN transceiver with sleep
mode supported.
- Add can_transceiver_phy_xlate for parsing phy
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c b/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
index 6415c6af0e8414a6cc8d15958a17ee749a3f28e9..f06b1df76ada023f432dce892c3346f45397ab54 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ struct can_transceiver_data {
u32 flags;
#define CAN_TRANSCEIVER_STB_PRESENT BIT(0)
#define CAN_TRANSCEIVER_EN_PRESENT BIT(1)
+#define CAN_TRANSCEIVER_DUAL_CH BIT(2)
};
struct can_transceiver_phy {
@@ -29,6 +30,7 @@ struct can_transceiver_phy {
struct can_transceiver_priv {
struct can_transceiver_phy *can_transceiver_phy;
struct mux_state *mux_state;
+ int num_ch;
};
/* Power on function */
@@ -81,6 +83,10 @@ static const struct can_transceiver_data tcan1043_drvdata = {
.flags = CAN_TRANSCEIVER_STB_PRESENT | CAN_TRANSCEIVER_EN_PRESENT,
};
+static const struct can_transceiver_data tja1048_drvdata = {
+ .flags = CAN_TRANSCEIVER_STB_PRESENT | CAN_TRANSCEIVER_DUAL_CH,
+};
+
static const struct of_device_id can_transceiver_phy_ids[] = {
{
.compatible = "ti,tcan1042",
@@ -90,6 +96,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id can_transceiver_phy_ids[] = {
.compatible = "ti,tcan1043",
.data = &tcan1043_drvdata
},
+ {
+ .compatible = "nxp,tja1048",
+ .data = &tja1048_drvdata
+ },
{
.compatible = "nxp,tjr1443",
.data = &tcan1043_drvdata
@@ -108,6 +118,25 @@ devm_mux_state_get_optional(struct device *dev, const char *mux_name)
return devm_mux_state_get(dev, mux_name);
}
+static struct phy *can_transceiver_phy_xlate(struct device *dev,
+ const struct of_phandle_args *args)
+{
+ struct can_transceiver_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ u32 idx;
+
+ if (priv->num_ch == 1)
+ return priv->can_transceiver_phy[0].generic_phy;
+
+ if (args->args_count != 1)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+ idx = args->args[0];
+ if (idx >= priv->num_ch)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+ return priv->can_transceiver_phy[idx].generic_phy;
+}
+
static int can_transceiver_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
@@ -120,7 +149,8 @@ static int can_transceiver_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct gpio_desc *enable_gpio;
struct mux_state *mux_state;
u32 max_bitrate = 0;
- int err;
+ int num_ch = 1;
+ int err, i;
match = of_match_node(can_transceiver_phy_ids, pdev->dev.of_node);
drvdata = match->data;
@@ -131,7 +161,11 @@ static int can_transceiver_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
- priv->can_transceiver_phy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct can_transceiver_phy),
+ if (drvdata->flags & CAN_TRANSCEIVER_DUAL_CH)
+ num_ch = 2;
+
+ priv->num_ch = num_ch;
+ priv->can_transceiver_phy = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_ch, sizeof(struct can_transceiver_phy),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!priv->can_transceiver_phy)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -142,38 +176,43 @@ static int can_transceiver_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
priv->mux_state = mux_state;
- phy = devm_phy_create(dev, dev->of_node,
- &can_transceiver_phy_ops);
- if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to create can transceiver phy\n");
- return PTR_ERR(phy);
- }
-
err = device_property_read_u32(dev, "max-bitrate", &max_bitrate);
if ((err != -EINVAL) && !max_bitrate)
dev_warn(dev, "Invalid value for transceiver max bitrate. Ignoring bitrate limit\n");
- phy->attrs.max_link_rate = max_bitrate;
- priv->can_transceiver_phy->generic_phy = phy;
- priv->can_transceiver_phy->priv = priv;
+ for (i = 0; i < num_ch; i++) {
+ phy = devm_phy_create(dev, dev->of_node, &can_transceiver_phy_ops);
+ if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to create can transceiver phy\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(phy);
+ }
- if (drvdata->flags & CAN_TRANSCEIVER_STB_PRESENT) {
- standby_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "standby", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
- if (IS_ERR(standby_gpio))
- return PTR_ERR(standby_gpio);
- priv->can_transceiver_phy->standby_gpio = standby_gpio;
- }
+ phy->attrs.max_link_rate = max_bitrate;
- if (drvdata->flags & CAN_TRANSCEIVER_EN_PRESENT) {
- enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
- if (IS_ERR(enable_gpio))
- return PTR_ERR(enable_gpio);
- priv->can_transceiver_phy->enable_gpio = enable_gpio;
- }
+ priv->can_transceiver_phy[i].generic_phy = phy;
+ priv->can_transceiver_phy[i].priv = priv;
- phy_set_drvdata(priv->can_transceiver_phy->generic_phy, priv->can_transceiver_phy);
+ if (drvdata->flags & CAN_TRANSCEIVER_STB_PRESENT) {
+ standby_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "standby", i,
+ GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
+ if (IS_ERR(standby_gpio))
+ return PTR_ERR(standby_gpio);
+ priv->can_transceiver_phy[i].standby_gpio = standby_gpio;
+ }
+
+ if (drvdata->flags & CAN_TRANSCEIVER_EN_PRESENT) {
+ enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "enable", i,
+ GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
+ if (IS_ERR(enable_gpio))
+ return PTR_ERR(enable_gpio);
+ priv->can_transceiver_phy[i].enable_gpio = enable_gpio;
+ }
+
+ phy_set_drvdata(priv->can_transceiver_phy[i].generic_phy,
+ &priv->can_transceiver_phy[i]);
+ }
- phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate);
+ phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, can_transceiver_phy_xlate);
return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider);
}
--
2.37.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 4/6] arm64: dts: imx95-15x15-evk: Use phys to replace xceiver-supply
2025-09-01 3:18 [PATCH v4 0/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Support TJA1048/TJA1051 Peng Fan
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Add dual channel support for TJA1048 Peng Fan
@ 2025-09-01 3:18 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] arm64: dts: imx8mp-evk: " Peng Fan
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: " Peng Fan
5 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2025-09-01 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Vinod Koul,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Aswath Govindraju, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Frank Li, Haibo Chen
Cc: linux-can, linux-phy, devicetree, linux-kernel, imx,
linux-arm-kernel, Peng Fan, Frank Li
The TJA1051T/3 used on i.MX95-15x15-EVK is actually high-speed CAN
transceiver, not a regulator supply. So use phys to reflect the truth.
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-15x15-evk.dts | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-15x15-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-15x15-evk.dts
index 148243470dd4ab03afdae949c8316f31467d1377..c229b748ca7aba2dc8cabe14d66e3d1dcd704c9a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-15x15-evk.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-15x15-evk.dts
@@ -106,12 +106,11 @@ reg_audio_switch1: regulator-audio-switch1 {
gpio = <&pcal6524 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
- reg_can2_stby: regulator-can2-stby {
- compatible = "regulator-fixed";
- regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
- regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
- regulator-name = "can2-stby";
- gpio = <&pcal6524 14 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+ flexcan2_phy: can-phy {
+ compatible = "nxp,tja1051", "ti,tcan1043";
+ #phy-cells = <0>;
+ max-bitrate = <5000000>;
+ standby-gpios = <&pcal6524 14 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
};
reg_m2_pwr: regulator-m2-pwr {
@@ -317,7 +316,7 @@ &enetc_port1 {
&flexcan2 {
pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_flexcan2>;
pinctrl-names = "default";
- xceiver-supply = <®_can2_stby>;
+ phys = <&flexcan2_phy>;
status = "okay";
};
--
2.37.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 5/6] arm64: dts: imx8mp-evk: Use phys to replace xceiver-supply
2025-09-01 3:18 [PATCH v4 0/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Support TJA1048/TJA1051 Peng Fan
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] arm64: dts: imx95-15x15-evk: Use phys to replace xceiver-supply Peng Fan
@ 2025-09-01 3:18 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: " Peng Fan
5 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2025-09-01 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Vinod Koul,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Aswath Govindraju, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Frank Li, Haibo Chen
Cc: linux-can, linux-phy, devicetree, linux-kernel, imx,
linux-arm-kernel, Peng Fan, Frank Li
The TJA1048 used on i.MX8MP-EVK is actually high-speed CAN transceiver,
not a regulator supply. So use phys to reflect the truth.
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-evk.dts | 43 +++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-evk.dts
index 3730792daf5010213cbb9f6869a8110ea28eb48a..59891627dc462d37dfd620eb68b893546cc20d6a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-evk.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-evk.dts
@@ -56,6 +56,16 @@ memory@40000000 {
<0x1 0x00000000 0 0xc0000000>;
};
+ flexcan_phy: can-phy {
+ compatible = "nxp,tja1048";
+ #phy-cells = <1>;
+ max-bitrate = <5000000>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_flexcan_phy>;
+ standby-gpios = <&gpio5 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>,
+ <&gpio4 27 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+ };
+
native-hdmi-connector {
compatible = "hdmi-connector";
label = "HDMI OUT";
@@ -103,28 +113,6 @@ reg_audio_pwr: regulator-audio-pwr {
enable-active-high;
};
- reg_can1_stby: regulator-can1-stby {
- compatible = "regulator-fixed";
- regulator-name = "can1-stby";
- pinctrl-names = "default";
- pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_flexcan1_reg>;
- regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
- regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
- gpio = <&gpio5 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
- enable-active-high;
- };
-
- reg_can2_stby: regulator-can2-stby {
- compatible = "regulator-fixed";
- regulator-name = "can2-stby";
- pinctrl-names = "default";
- pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_flexcan2_reg>;
- regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
- regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
- gpio = <&gpio4 27 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
- enable-active-high;
- };
-
reg_pcie0: regulator-pcie {
compatible = "regulator-fixed";
pinctrl-names = "default";
@@ -431,14 +419,14 @@ ethphy1: ethernet-phy@1 {
&flexcan1 {
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_flexcan1>;
- xceiver-supply = <®_can1_stby>;
+ phys = <&flexcan_phy 0>;
status = "okay";
};
&flexcan2 {
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_flexcan2>;
- xceiver-supply = <®_can2_stby>;
+ phys = <&flexcan_phy 1>;
status = "disabled";/* can2 pin conflict with pdm */
};
@@ -903,14 +891,9 @@ MX8MP_IOMUXC_SAI5_RXD3__CAN2_TX 0x154
>;
};
- pinctrl_flexcan1_reg: flexcan1reggrp {
+ pinctrl_flexcan_phy: flexcanphygrp {
fsl,pins = <
MX8MP_IOMUXC_SPDIF_EXT_CLK__GPIO5_IO05 0x154 /* CAN1_STBY */
- >;
- };
-
- pinctrl_flexcan2_reg: flexcan2reggrp {
- fsl,pins = <
MX8MP_IOMUXC_SAI2_MCLK__GPIO4_IO27 0x154 /* CAN2_STBY */
>;
};
--
2.37.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 6/6] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: Use phys to replace xceiver-supply
2025-09-01 3:18 [PATCH v4 0/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Support TJA1048/TJA1051 Peng Fan
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] arm64: dts: imx8mp-evk: " Peng Fan
@ 2025-09-01 3:18 ` Peng Fan
5 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2025-09-01 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Vinod Koul,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Aswath Govindraju, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Frank Li, Haibo Chen
Cc: linux-can, linux-phy, devicetree, linux-kernel, imx,
linux-arm-kernel, Peng Fan, Frank Li
The TJA1057 used on i.MX93 EVK is actually high-speed CAN
transceiver, not a regulator supply. So use phys to reflect the truth.
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts | 17 ++++++++---------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
index e24e12f04526c3a08c0bdc6134297fb010e6e926..4c52f22bbfac99722184b4d8679f48c4396b557f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
@@ -62,6 +62,13 @@ vdevbuffer: vdevbuffer@a4020000 {
};
+ flexcan_phy: can-phy {
+ compatible = "nxp,tja1057", "ti,tcan1043";
+ #phy-cells = <0>;
+ max-bitrate = <5000000>;
+ standby-gpios = <&adp5585 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ };
+
reg_vdd_12v: regulator-vdd-12v {
compatible = "regulator-fixed";
regulator-name = "VDD_12V";
@@ -87,14 +94,6 @@ reg_audio_pwr: regulator-audio-pwr {
enable-active-high;
};
- reg_can2_standby: regulator-can2-standby {
- compatible = "regulator-fixed";
- regulator-name = "can2-stby";
- regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
- regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
- gpio = <&adp5585 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
- };
-
reg_m2_pwr: regulator-m2-pwr {
compatible = "regulator-fixed";
regulator-name = "M.2-power";
@@ -284,7 +283,7 @@ ethphy2: ethernet-phy@2 {
&flexcan2 {
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_flexcan2>;
- xceiver-supply = <®_can2_standby>;
+ phys = <&flexcan_phy>;
status = "okay";
};
--
2.37.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document NXP TJA105X/1048
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document NXP TJA105X/1048 Peng Fan
@ 2025-09-01 18:54 ` Conor Dooley
2025-09-01 19:00 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2025-09-01 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng Fan
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Vinod Koul,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Aswath Govindraju, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Frank Li, Haibo Chen,
linux-can, linux-phy, devicetree, linux-kernel, imx,
linux-arm-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2630 bytes --]
On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:18:11AM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> The TJA105[1,7] is a high-speed CAN transceiver which is a pin-compatible
> alternative for TI TCAN1043 with sleep mode supported, and has a compatible
> programming model, therefore use ti,tcan1043 as fallback compatible.
>
> The TJA1048 is a dual high-speed CAN transceiver with sleep mode supported.
>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> index 4a8c3829d85d3c4a4963750d03567c1c345beb91..f8e0c24856a2ba83b5c988b246464f47e11a032f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> @@ -19,18 +19,25 @@ properties:
> - enum:
> - microchip,ata6561
> - const: ti,tcan1042
> + - items:
> + - enum:
> + - nxp,tja1051
> + - nxp,tja1057
> + - const: ti,tcan1043
> - enum:
> - ti,tcan1042
> - ti,tcan1043
> + - nxp,tja1048
> - nxp,tjr1443
>
> '#phy-cells':
> - const: 0
> + enum: [0, 1]
>
> standby-gpios:
> description:
> gpio node to toggle standby signal on transceiver
> - maxItems: 1
> + minItems: 1
> + maxItems: 2
You're adding a second standby gpio, which one is which?
I assume you mean that item 1 is stbn1 and item 2 is stbn 2 for tja1048.
Might be kinda obvious, but I think it should be mentioned.
tja105{1,7} don't have a standby gpio, but they do have a silent mode.
silent mode seems fundamentally different to standby, since the receiver
still works. Seems like that should be handled differently, no?
>
> enable-gpios:
> description:
> @@ -53,6 +60,25 @@ required:
> - compatible
> - '#phy-cells'
>
> +allOf:
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + const: nxp,tja1048
> + then:
> + properties:
> + '#phy-cells':
> + const: 1
> + standby-gpios:
> + minItems: 2
> + else:
> + properties:
> + '#phy-cells':
> + const: 0
> + standby-gpios:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> additionalProperties: false
>
> examples:
>
> --
> 2.37.1
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document NXP TJA105X/1048
2025-09-01 18:54 ` Conor Dooley
@ 2025-09-01 19:00 ` Conor Dooley
2025-09-02 2:24 ` Peng Fan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2025-09-01 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng Fan
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Vinod Koul,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Aswath Govindraju, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Frank Li, Haibo Chen,
linux-can, linux-phy, devicetree, linux-kernel, imx,
linux-arm-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3266 bytes --]
On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 07:54:01PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:18:11AM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> > The TJA105[1,7] is a high-speed CAN transceiver which is a pin-compatible
> > alternative for TI TCAN1043 with sleep mode supported, and has a compatible
> > programming model, therefore use ti,tcan1043 as fallback compatible.
> >
> > The TJA1048 is a dual high-speed CAN transceiver with sleep mode supported.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> > index 4a8c3829d85d3c4a4963750d03567c1c345beb91..f8e0c24856a2ba83b5c988b246464f47e11a032f 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> > @@ -19,18 +19,25 @@ properties:
> > - enum:
> > - microchip,ata6561
> > - const: ti,tcan1042
> > + - items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - nxp,tja1051
> > + - nxp,tja1057
> > + - const: ti,tcan1043
> > - enum:
> > - ti,tcan1042
> > - ti,tcan1043
> > + - nxp,tja1048
> > - nxp,tjr1443
> >
> > '#phy-cells':
> > - const: 0
> > + enum: [0, 1]
> >
> > standby-gpios:
> > description:
> > gpio node to toggle standby signal on transceiver
> > - maxItems: 1
> > + minItems: 1
> > + maxItems: 2
>
> You're adding a second standby gpio, which one is which?
> I assume you mean that item 1 is stbn1 and item 2 is stbn 2 for tja1048.
> Might be kinda obvious, but I think it should be mentioned.
>
> tja105{1,7} don't have a standby gpio, but they do have a silent mode.
> silent mode seems fundamentally different to standby, since the receiver
> still works. Seems like that should be handled differently, no?
The docs for standby mode for the tcan1043 don't match with the tja1051,
"Standby mode is a low power mode where the driver and receiver are
disabled," so does the fallback compatible even make sense? Seems like a
combination of enable and standby gpios are used to put the tcan device
into silent mode but the tja1051 has a pin for that alone and seemingly
does not support standby at all?
>
> >
> > enable-gpios:
> > description:
> > @@ -53,6 +60,25 @@ required:
> > - compatible
> > - '#phy-cells'
> >
> > +allOf:
> > + - if:
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + contains:
> > + const: nxp,tja1048
> > + then:
> > + properties:
> > + '#phy-cells':
> > + const: 1
> > + standby-gpios:
> > + minItems: 2
> > + else:
> > + properties:
> > + '#phy-cells':
> > + const: 0
> > + standby-gpios:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > additionalProperties: false
> >
> > examples:
> >
> > --
> > 2.37.1
> >
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document NXP TJA105X/1048
2025-09-01 19:00 ` Conor Dooley
@ 2025-09-02 2:24 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-02 19:31 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2025-09-02 2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Conor Dooley
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Vinod Koul,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Aswath Govindraju, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Frank Li, Bough Chen,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Hi Conor,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can:
> Document NXP TJA105X/1048
>
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 07:54:01PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:18:11AM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > The TJA105[1,7] is a high-speed CAN transceiver which is a
> > > pin-compatible alternative for TI TCAN1043 with sleep mode
> > > supported, and has a compatible programming model, therefore
> use ti,tcan1043 as fallback compatible.
> > >
> > > The TJA1048 is a dual high-speed CAN transceiver with sleep mode
> supported.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml | 30
> ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git
> > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> > > index
> > >
> 4a8c3829d85d3c4a4963750d03567c1c345beb91..f8e0c24856a2ba83
> b5c988b246
> > > 464f47e11a032f 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-
> can.yaml
> > > @@ -19,18 +19,25 @@ properties:
> > > - enum:
> > > - microchip,ata6561
> > > - const: ti,tcan1042
> > > + - items:
> > > + - enum:
> > > + - nxp,tja1051
> > > + - nxp,tja1057
> > > + - const: ti,tcan1043
> > > - enum:
> > > - ti,tcan1042
> > > - ti,tcan1043
> > > + - nxp,tja1048
> > > - nxp,tjr1443
> > >
> > > '#phy-cells':
> > > - const: 0
> > > + enum: [0, 1]
> > >
> > > standby-gpios:
> > > description:
> > > gpio node to toggle standby signal on transceiver
> > > - maxItems: 1
> > > + minItems: 1
> > > + maxItems: 2
> >
> > You're adding a second standby gpio, which one is which?
> > I assume you mean that item 1 is stbn1 and item 2 is stbn 2 for
> tja1048.
Yes. There are two standby pins.
> > Might be kinda obvious, but I think it should be mentioned.
I could update description as below.
"
description:
gpio node to toggle standby signal on transceiver. For two Items,
item 1 is for stbn1, item 2 is for stbn2.
"
> >
> > tja105{1,7} don't have a standby gpio, but they do have a silent
> mode.
Right. Tja105{1,7} has a pin S for silent mode.
> > silent mode seems fundamentally different to standby, since the
> > receiver still works. Seems like that should be handled differently, no?
>
> The docs for standby mode for the tcan1043 don't match with the
> tja1051, "Standby mode is a low power mode where the driver and
> receiver are disabled," so does the fallback compatible even make
> sense? Seems like a combination of enable and standby gpios are used
> to put the tcan device into silent mode but the tja1051 has a pin for
> that alone and seemingly does not support standby at all?
Thanks for looking into the details. I also read more into the datasheet.
Tcan1043:
EN nSTB
H H ---> normal mode
L H ---> slient mode
H L ---> standby mode
L X --->off mode
TJA1051
EN S
H L --> normal mode
H H --> slient mode
L X --> off mode
Your analysis is correct. silent is different with standby,
but we only wanna to use normal and off mode
If we need to handle differently, I need
to add a new optional property
silent-gpios:
description:
gpio node to toggle silent signal on transceiver
minItems: 1
How do you think?
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> >
> > >
> > > enable-gpios:
> > > description:
> > > @@ -53,6 +60,25 @@ required:
> > > - compatible
> > > - '#phy-cells'
> > >
> > > +allOf:
> > > + - if:
> > > + properties:
> > > + compatible:
> > > + contains:
> > > + const: nxp,tja1048
> > > + then:
> > > + properties:
> > > + '#phy-cells':
> > > + const: 1
> > > + standby-gpios:
> > > + minItems: 2
> > > + else:
> > > + properties:
> > > + '#phy-cells':
> > > + const: 0
> > > + standby-gpios:
> > > + maxItems: 1
> > > +
> > > additionalProperties: false
> > >
> > > examples:
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.37.1
> > >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document NXP TJA105X/1048
2025-09-02 2:24 ` Peng Fan
@ 2025-09-02 19:31 ` Conor Dooley
2025-09-03 6:00 ` Peng Fan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2025-09-02 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng Fan
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Vinod Koul,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Aswath Govindraju, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Frank Li, Bough Chen,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4336 bytes --]
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 02:24:49AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can:
> > Document NXP TJA105X/1048
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 07:54:01PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:18:11AM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > The TJA105[1,7] is a high-speed CAN transceiver which is a
> > > > pin-compatible alternative for TI TCAN1043 with sleep mode
> > > > supported, and has a compatible programming model, therefore
> > use ti,tcan1043 as fallback compatible.
> > > >
> > > > The TJA1048 is a dual high-speed CAN transceiver with sleep mode
> > supported.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml | 30
> > ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git
> > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> > > > index
> > > >
> > 4a8c3829d85d3c4a4963750d03567c1c345beb91..f8e0c24856a2ba83
> > b5c988b246
> > > > 464f47e11a032f 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-
> > can.yaml
> > > > @@ -19,18 +19,25 @@ properties:
> > > > - enum:
> > > > - microchip,ata6561
> > > > - const: ti,tcan1042
> > > > + - items:
> > > > + - enum:
> > > > + - nxp,tja1051
> > > > + - nxp,tja1057
> > > > + - const: ti,tcan1043
> > > > - enum:
> > > > - ti,tcan1042
> > > > - ti,tcan1043
> > > > + - nxp,tja1048
> > > > - nxp,tjr1443
> > > >
> > > > '#phy-cells':
> > > > - const: 0
> > > > + enum: [0, 1]
> > > >
> > > > standby-gpios:
> > > > description:
> > > > gpio node to toggle standby signal on transceiver
> > > > - maxItems: 1
> > > > + minItems: 1
> > > > + maxItems: 2
> > >
> > > You're adding a second standby gpio, which one is which?
> > > I assume you mean that item 1 is stbn1 and item 2 is stbn 2 for
> > tja1048.
>
> Yes. There are two standby pins.
>
> > > Might be kinda obvious, but I think it should be mentioned.
>
> I could update description as below.
> "
> description:
> gpio node to toggle standby signal on transceiver. For two Items,
> item 1 is for stbn1, item 2 is for stbn2.
Sure.
>
> > >
> > > tja105{1,7} don't have a standby gpio, but they do have a silent
> > mode.
>
> Right. Tja105{1,7} has a pin S for silent mode.
>
> > > silent mode seems fundamentally different to standby, since the
> > > receiver still works. Seems like that should be handled differently, no?
> >
> > The docs for standby mode for the tcan1043 don't match with the
> > tja1051, "Standby mode is a low power mode where the driver and
> > receiver are disabled," so does the fallback compatible even make
> > sense? Seems like a combination of enable and standby gpios are used
> > to put the tcan device into silent mode but the tja1051 has a pin for
> > that alone and seemingly does not support standby at all?
>
> Thanks for looking into the details. I also read more into the datasheet.
>
> Tcan1043:
> EN nSTB
> H H ---> normal mode
> L H ---> slient mode
> H L ---> standby mode
> L X --->off mode
>
> TJA1051
> EN S
> H L --> normal mode
> H H --> slient mode
> L X --> off mode
>
> Your analysis is correct. silent is different with standby,
> but we only wanna to use normal and off mode
In addition, it looks like there are some tja1051 devices that don't
even have the enable pin? Of the 4 SKUs, there are 2 that use pin5 as
Vio and 1 that has it n/c. Only the T/E device has an enable there.
> If we need to handle differently, I need
> to add a new optional property
>
> silent-gpios:
> description:
> gpio node to toggle silent signal on transceiver
> minItems: 1
Ye, I think so. And probably add some if/then to use it instead of
standby on the relevant chips.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document NXP TJA105X/1048
2025-09-02 19:31 ` Conor Dooley
@ 2025-09-03 6:00 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-03 6:49 ` Peng Fan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2025-09-03 6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Conor Dooley
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Vinod Koul,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Aswath Govindraju, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Frank Li, Bough Chen,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Hi Conor,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can:
> Document NXP TJA105X/1048
>
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 02:24:49AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Hi Conor,
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can:
> > > Document NXP TJA105X/1048
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 07:54:01PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:18:11AM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > > The TJA105[1,7] is a high-speed CAN transceiver which is a
> > > > > pin-compatible alternative for TI TCAN1043 with sleep mode
> > > > > supported, and has a compatible programming model, therefore
> > > use ti,tcan1043 as fallback compatible.
> > > > >
> > > > > The TJA1048 is a dual high-speed CAN transceiver with sleep
> mode
> > > supported.
> > > > >
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-can.yaml | 30
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git
> > > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-
> can.yaml
> > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-
> can.yaml
> > > > > index
> > > > >
> > >
> 4a8c3829d85d3c4a4963750d03567c1c345beb91..f8e0c24856a2ba83
> > > b5c988b246
> > > > > 464f47e11a032f 100644
> > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-
> can.yaml
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/ti,tcan104x-
> > > can.yaml
> > > > > @@ -19,18 +19,25 @@ properties:
> > > > > - enum:
> > > > > - microchip,ata6561
> > > > > - const: ti,tcan1042
> > > > > + - items:
> > > > > + - enum:
> > > > > + - nxp,tja1051
> > > > > + - nxp,tja1057
> > > > > + - const: ti,tcan1043
> > > > > - enum:
> > > > > - ti,tcan1042
> > > > > - ti,tcan1043
> > > > > + - nxp,tja1048
> > > > > - nxp,tjr1443
> > > > >
> > > > > '#phy-cells':
> > > > > - const: 0
> > > > > + enum: [0, 1]
> > > > >
> > > > > standby-gpios:
> > > > > description:
> > > > > gpio node to toggle standby signal on transceiver
> > > > > - maxItems: 1
> > > > > + minItems: 1
> > > > > + maxItems: 2
> > > >
> > > > You're adding a second standby gpio, which one is which?
> > > > I assume you mean that item 1 is stbn1 and item 2 is stbn 2 for
> > > tja1048.
> >
> > Yes. There are two standby pins.
> >
> > > > Might be kinda obvious, but I think it should be mentioned.
> >
> > I could update description as below.
> > "
> > description:
> > gpio node to toggle standby signal on transceiver. For two Items,
> > item 1 is for stbn1, item 2 is for stbn2.
>
> Sure.
>
> >
> > > >
> > > > tja105{1,7} don't have a standby gpio, but they do have a silent
> > > mode.
> >
> > Right. Tja105{1,7} has a pin S for silent mode.
> >
> > > > silent mode seems fundamentally different to standby, since the
> > > > receiver still works. Seems like that should be handled differently,
> no?
> > >
> > > The docs for standby mode for the tcan1043 don't match with the
> > > tja1051, "Standby mode is a low power mode where the driver and
> > > receiver are disabled," so does the fallback compatible even make
> > > sense? Seems like a combination of enable and standby gpios are
> used
> > > to put the tcan device into silent mode but the tja1051 has a pin
> > > for that alone and seemingly does not support standby at all?
> >
> > Thanks for looking into the details. I also read more into the
> datasheet.
> >
> > Tcan1043:
> > EN nSTB
> > H H ---> normal mode
> > L H ---> slient mode
> > H L ---> standby mode
> > L X --->off mode
> >
> > TJA1051
> > EN S
> > H L --> normal mode
> > H H --> slient mode
> > L X --> off mode
> >
> > Your analysis is correct. silent is different with standby, but we
> > only wanna to use normal and off mode
>
> In addition, it looks like there are some tja1051 devices that don't even
> have the enable pin? Of the 4 SKUs, there are 2 that use pin5 as Vio
> and 1 that has it n/c. Only the T/E device has an enable there.
Thanks again for the detailed reading into datasheet.
Yes. But I would like to only keep one compatible
"nxp,tja1051" from a board design level, EN could be always tied to high
for TJA1051T/E. So to dt-binding, EN it is optional for all TJA1051
variants.
I am thinking to use below compatible in V4 for the devices added
in this patch. Does this look good to you?
- items:
- const: nxp,tja1057
- const: nxp,tja1051
- enum:
....
- nxp,tja1048
- nxp,tja1051
....
>
> > If we need to handle differently, I need to add a new optional
> > property
> >
> > silent-gpios:
> > description:
> > gpio node to toggle silent signal on transceiver
> > minItems: 1
>
> Ye, I think so. And probably add some if/then to use it instead of
> standby on the relevant chips.
Yes. Agree.
Thanks,
Peng.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document NXP TJA105X/1048
2025-09-03 6:00 ` Peng Fan
@ 2025-09-03 6:49 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-03 16:25 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2025-09-03 6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng Fan, Conor Dooley
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Vinod Koul,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Aswath Govindraju, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Frank Li, Bough Chen,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can:
> Document NXP TJA105X/1048
>
...
>
> Thanks again for the detailed reading into datasheet.
>
> Yes. But I would like to only keep one compatible "nxp,tja1051" from a
> board design level, EN could be always tied to high for TJA1051T/E. So
> to dt-binding, EN it is optional for all TJA1051 variants.
>
> I am thinking to use below compatible in V4 for the devices added in
> this patch. Does this look good to you?
>
> - items:
> - const: nxp,tja1057
> - const: nxp,tja1051
> - enum:
> ....
> - nxp,tja1048
> - nxp,tja1051
Considering TJA1057 does not have EN, I may need to use:
- enum:
....
- nxp,tja1048
- nxp,tja1051
- nxp,tja1057
....
Thanks,
Peng.
> ....
>
> >
> > > If we need to handle differently, I need to add a new optional
> > > property
> > >
> > > silent-gpios:
> > > description:
> > > gpio node to toggle silent signal on transceiver
> > > minItems: 1
> >
> > Ye, I think so. And probably add some if/then to use it instead of
> > standby on the relevant chips.
>
> Yes. Agree.
>
> Thanks,
> Peng.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document NXP TJA105X/1048
2025-09-03 6:49 ` Peng Fan
@ 2025-09-03 16:25 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2025-09-03 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng Fan
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Vinod Koul,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, Aswath Govindraju, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Frank Li, Bough Chen,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1331 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 06:49:47AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can:
> > Document NXP TJA105X/1048
> >
> ...
> >
> > Thanks again for the detailed reading into datasheet.
> >
> > Yes. But I would like to only keep one compatible "nxp,tja1051" from a
> > board design level, EN could be always tied to high for TJA1051T/E. So
> > to dt-binding, EN it is optional for all TJA1051 variants.
> >
> > I am thinking to use below compatible in V4 for the devices added in
> > this patch. Does this look good to you?
> >
> > - items:
> > - const: nxp,tja1057
> > - const: nxp,tja1051
> > - enum:
> > ....
> > - nxp,tja1048
> > - nxp,tja1051
>
> Considering TJA1057 does not have EN, I may need to use:
> - enum:
> ....
> - nxp,tja1048
> - nxp,tja1051
> - nxp,tja1057
> ....
Seems reasonable to me, go for it.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-03 16:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-01 3:18 [PATCH v4 0/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Support TJA1048/TJA1051 Peng Fan
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Document NXP TJA105X/1048 Peng Fan
2025-09-01 18:54 ` Conor Dooley
2025-09-01 19:00 ` Conor Dooley
2025-09-02 2:24 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-02 19:31 ` Conor Dooley
2025-09-03 6:00 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-03 6:49 ` Peng Fan
2025-09-03 16:25 ` Conor Dooley
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Introduce can_transceiver_priv Peng Fan
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Add dual channel support for TJA1048 Peng Fan
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] arm64: dts: imx95-15x15-evk: Use phys to replace xceiver-supply Peng Fan
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] arm64: dts: imx8mp-evk: " Peng Fan
2025-09-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: " Peng Fan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).