From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail11.truemail.it (mail11.truemail.it [217.194.8.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6D1E1FC0FE for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2025 05:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745560384; cv=none; b=dhUejB8IrWNAFe7vlkK/sdAYsiqyH6ISN2yEGXOzNjYK/ETHU03oCQhNPGMTxy0aVhXET0CGne1+08ePydfJ4LlJ3ny4XT5HApHGE1T1VYCo3XegpyuB8LLWXb4pSNwK4fExyjxYUIFYiAuUiKSpKz0l9t0+uIeSzR1kTIDTLx0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745560384; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7ZvFXhNY8gnq82v3dNyEoFqX8xDYnTNWAxehS3YFPz4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ase8xOaC7yCcJhFxWY+Rkc7DZEEad+rNqq4OWgKWvS5psXqvsfsnh46WSBngqfSbPc9xqqDce9o9NP4ZzTVZDHrgoMSU9pf+8J67H+NtFhmAWXoLk06f1vrKk1QuPs4Y52jOBOBCxl32DUR/ZYqrBOFMtH7ZczW/l4WtwOForyQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b=yuheSb8h; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b="yuheSb8h" Received: from gaggiata.pivistrello.it (93-49-2-63.ip317.fastwebnet.it [93.49.2.63]) by mail11.truemail.it (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 083881F944; Fri, 25 Apr 2025 07:52:53 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dolcini.it; s=default; t=1745560373; bh=UyQprxTrTzeJEuddDXNiYr4ctzPhYLZ6Cp5WEsAgS9s=; h=Received:From:To:Subject; b=yuheSb8htIWbOcxaC4uxXuHyj0CX6UJYao3KmcRicGjt3irM9wHqvMVjc4T3ol8NN rK8IkJo+Hm6qk+L8FoHUQyue8CZ6yn/iWFiuJpYoulREypk49UYHf+O89rHlwEq5yg XRM1O0COTqgzcgB2kIwV76mGvhoZzqLZgcb8sZ5G7LnHokIOPXrIiyng+16M8qZlDr kiFJENmxo9Y2jfp9BZB9mbgU9j0XWjyNvpSENR+D9OfPCrw1tHKGAEcE89y/IPahTh Mgigt1E8PCarR6soLXSVo4hGNQh+DKfeUwv6Kszss1GDw6xhYpIOtsqVI4/CzGhpHG mxWZJ9MBSeyVw== Received: by gaggiata.pivistrello.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9BD827F94C; Fri, 25 Apr 2025 07:52:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 07:52:52 +0200 From: Francesco Dolcini To: Wojciech Dubowik Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Francesco Dolcini , Philippe Schenker , Manuel Traut , Francesco Dolcini , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: imx8mm-verdin: Link reg_usdhc2_vqmmc to usdhc2 Message-ID: References: <20250424095916.1389731-1-Wojciech.Dubowik@mt.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: imx@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250424095916.1389731-1-Wojciech.Dubowik@mt.com> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 11:59:14AM +0200, Wojciech Dubowik wrote: > Define vqmmc regulator-gpio for usdhc2 with vin-supply > coming from LDO5. > > Without this definition LDO5 will be powered down, disabling > SD card after bootup. This has been introduced in commit > f5aab0438ef1 ("regulator: pca9450: Fix enable register for LDO5"). > > Fixes: 6a57f224f734 ("arm64: dts: freescale: add initial support for verdin imx8m mini") > Tested-by: Manuel Traut > Reviewed-by: Philippe Schenker > Tested-by: Francesco Dolcini > Reviewed-by: Francesco Dolcini > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Wojciech Dubowik Fixes: f5aab0438ef1 ("regulator: pca9450: Fix enable register for LDO5") FYI, you can have multiple fixes tag, and to be safe to not introduce regression on some stable backport because the 2 patches are not back-ported at the same time, better to have both the Fixes tags here. No need to send a v5, the tag should be picked up from this email. Francesco