imx.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: "Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)" <quic_abchauha@quicinc.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>,
	andrew@lunn.ch, hkallweit1@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	xiaolei.wang@windriver.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: phy: clear phydev->devlink when the link is deleted
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 22:13:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aD9lXa1JVRyJKuP_@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d696a426-40bb-4c1a-b42d-990fb690de5e@quicinc.com>

On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 01:39:47PM -0700, Abhishek Chauhan (ABC) wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/23/2025 8:19 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 5/23/2025 1:37 AM, Wei Fang wrote:
> >> There is a potential crash issue when disabling and re-enabling the
> >> network port. When disabling the network port, phy_detach() calls
> >> device_link_del() to remove the device link, but it does not clear
> >> phydev->devlink, so phydev->devlink is not a NULL pointer. Then the
> >> network port is re-enabled, but if phy_attach_direct() fails before
> >> calling device_link_add(), the code jumps to the "error" label and
> >> calls phy_detach(). Since phydev->devlink retains the old value from
> >> the previous attach/detach cycle, device_link_del() uses the old value,
> >> which accesses a NULL pointer and causes a crash. The simplified crash
> >> log is as follows.
> >>
> >> [   24.702421] Call trace:
> >> [   24.704856]  device_link_put_kref+0x20/0x120
> >> [   24.709124]  device_link_del+0x30/0x48
> >> [   24.712864]  phy_detach+0x24/0x168
> >> [   24.716261]  phy_attach_direct+0x168/0x3a4
> >> [   24.720352]  phylink_fwnode_phy_connect+0xc8/0x14c
> >> [   24.725140]  phylink_of_phy_connect+0x1c/0x34
> >>
> >> Therefore, phydev->devlink needs to be cleared when the device link is
> >> deleted.
> >>
> >> Fixes: bc66fa87d4fd ("net: phy: Add link between phy dev and mac dev")
> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> > 
> @Wei 
> What happens in case of shared mdio ? 
> 
> 1. Device 23040000 has the mdio node of both the ethernet phy and device 23000000 references the phy-handle present in the Device 23040000
> 2. When rmmod of the driver happens 
> 3. the parent devlink is already deleted. 
> 4. This cause the child mdio to access an entry causing a corruption. 
> 5. Thought this fix would help but i see that its not helping the case. 
> 
> Wondering if this is a legacy issue with shared mdio framework. 

The device link does nothing for this as it has DL_FLAG_STATELESS set,
which only affects suspend/resume/shutdown ordering, and with
DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME also set, runtime PM.

The device probe/removal ordering is unaffected. Maybe that's a
problem, but it needs careful consideration to change.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-03 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-23  8:37 [PATCH v2 net] net: phy: clear phydev->devlink when the link is deleted Wei Fang
2025-05-23 13:18 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-05-23 15:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-06-03 20:39   ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2025-06-03 21:13     ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2025-06-04  6:00     ` Wei Fang
2025-06-04  6:09       ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2025-06-05  4:59         ` Sarosh Hasan
2025-06-04  8:07       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-06-04 12:08         ` Wei Fang
2025-06-06  0:52           ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2025-06-06  5:26             ` Wei Fang
2025-05-28  0:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aD9lXa1JVRyJKuP_@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=quic_abchauha@quicinc.com \
    --cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --cc=xiaolei.wang@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).