From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com (mail-pl1-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 870CF21B9D6 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 16:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751904788; cv=none; b=qty8OY+6iWMXd1HS4lGDFpg/Iru2HKA83U1PlvZs6ie00xwVaGI1Hcxl8KqlIrraK2p9m0eH8PJzjBGBaO7m8eYH1W/XbQqa5XchMUyLazQm16aDW3ZLbbsU7KIkNPk0JzfimlHBB2SnqJ07XtsrbOD+VX+u0ukrPT+zTGVarYM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751904788; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0h2aJlmPnSWDsdCU/F4A5RMFeDhbcjsspm212YRtJYA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tirgHpGlYOpA/SKkWky+21mLDrHRC7gFQMRd4qTl1cCC5BNwFgnBdE0aLfG2NYtSFHs+f6j7CGiVoTJ4O5BFE9QOGUr/eD76jOO3bxEBI/h7O9M69F6kpOJn8OXTFZsHMgonDOvI/B3HtmID5gjlYzN3JED2JdWSvFrRgH8T2Ls= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b=cCKEjC+a; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="cCKEjC+a" Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-23526264386so31908805ad.2 for ; Mon, 07 Jul 2025 09:13:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1751904786; x=1752509586; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rTB9AhUzbXze0SvlJXhNv6ywJb1Le3/qXDwCwOY7m50=; b=cCKEjC+aqkZMu9GsQg0VPoRGVT7SeVmLqO1PvYfV6/HzalT8XXsTcDImi8Lwi5sUHE D3QHm17O9RdXDRkrebDSnYyfknfIDy9/x2LRsmtgsHndy/exXJ9Rumd6V8RlcOId6lM9 SOd5xqRGd3nrYg8wK+NyhBnO2+k2puEHt4JgQzACPlj9n2mKshS16VUaPTv8j6ySrHvZ n1cpyYu4AQtY+F8N9Ak6hJ7zEvprblBz7/T8YlpEpWWEERBA8njysG4LV95uW7WtTUuk LMo/zFyJj3RHHCYsDRrgTX68XBDDijwcCnoZzOk7n+zj1sqRW7CrYFJNBtYtNNhDVWqo cUhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1751904786; x=1752509586; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=rTB9AhUzbXze0SvlJXhNv6ywJb1Le3/qXDwCwOY7m50=; b=vpGJZXMrkjxRaeIoJR4WBLsjNLZjLhmfDdwIUUEkHrxpjqLs6wRr1OGEEViqobpmFi aHg75o8C6SktLvL9oL75koECDuX9NMroOjmhbduE+sHmwDbSDcPjzdXvYtTGLK3zWEHi dwZT2HkEMbruB+yurNilrF3P/HGW/8YqLcjeFhqz9xfyyupaVxh8RM3URv9C6dwrzLTg 4ws/fGzywybXp8/g6/RwZw3gWtP1Hfu7l92wI5m7sSsdc69v1N4oP81FXLX6RobmKVXx xV88+ZCmj56esqxDBQ4G8/RQzD/fWlyRU+aDfpqDqBGEW/eyc0Lqi+wsJhHtM5FX2YOF TmPw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUJO9lpnQCuaAoCfZ3ib36U6prDqfJ1hqyT8lENsDtQOiK/d1HIwkDByrgmqwlWAfJYpak=@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywy1kojzDrFdw2Q5CRpOQqWwGeudzwdu5/trX28ujQizPSdXpmr 0u9k5zf68eG7mYVY5I2nz+2KUWE+fI6pUg97ahTI4Uo7aY8c/Vhb17CwZIPN4Roiq6A= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsipOKIh46Jjd0GwV0OQIlYi36nKIAqfrO2Ipf9yS3HhIDHkY9f8dCUncGtRAn c3qOzl9qIrQA92DDWAj100Ws8/ErawvBNzrUdusz6FgGMIJP3BgRhoO3rVOhtIG2Ogo3im4AgPo r5PTFn0Aaz7YiHtYf/CiyLzW7bqOH/btH7Y4+mrVwnxduhupBUdUNheYhL3CQ60nCiNZtc0fYqS BiC8n24udVaF69qd1i1mDTTuwKTaHdp9f2Z5giU/1qK01mIVdVvCmOKwCrG3hzeleiWHPbFJBuV eitL82+cCiOlN/aCu8s6rQ8eSkTTN1PP7k2S9CtW1OpmX0oU4uboIeNtMtQz65JAZw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEQezXaHRglxK6u+wE7BwHS5SdjM0yKB0UdNJiBREdoJn93Iqgm0TzBfL2Hm1mR3xJxK3359A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:41c1:b0:235:c781:c305 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-23c8755c92amr199352805ad.24.1751904785665; Mon, 07 Jul 2025 09:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p14s ([2604:3d09:148c:c800:1746:c463:9d35:6eed]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 41be03b00d2f7-b38ee475a3asm9236671a12.17.2025.07.07.09.13.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Jul 2025 09:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 10:13:02 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Hiago De Franco Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Iuliana Prodan , Peng Fan , Daniel Baluta , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hiago De Franco , Ritesh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: merge ITCM and DTCM regions Message-ID: References: <20250703130831.18830-1-hiagofranco@gmail.com> <20250704190816.kth7bdf34ufc2ht6@hiagonb> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: imx@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250704190816.kth7bdf34ufc2ht6@hiagonb> On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 04:08:16PM -0300, Hiago De Franco wrote: > Hi Mathieu, > > On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 10:25:19AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > Good morning, > > > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 10:08:31AM -0300, Hiago De Franco wrote: > > > From: Hiago De Franco > > > > > > Merge the contiguous ITCM and DTCM regions into a single region to > > > prevent failures when loading ELF files with large sections: > > > > > > remoteproc remoteproc0: powering up imx-rproc > > > remoteproc remoteproc0: Booting fw image rproc-imx-rproc-fw, size 151824 > > > imx-rproc imx8mp-cm7: Translation failed: da = 0x1f48 len = 0x1fcb0 > > > remoteproc remoteproc0: bad phdr da 0x1f48 mem 0x1fcb0 > > > remoteproc remoteproc0: Failed to load program segments: -22 > > > remoteproc remoteproc0: Boot failed: -22 > > > > > > This approach is the same as commit 8749919defb8 ("remoteproc: > > > imx_rproc: Merge TCML/U"). > > > > > > Suggested-by: Ritesh Kumar > > > Signed-off-by: Hiago De Franco > > > --- > > > Hi, > > > > > > The ELF I tested had the following data section: > > > > > > Memory region Used Size Region Size %age Used > > > m_interrupts: 680 B 1 KB 66.41% > > > m_text: 6984 B 127 KB 5.37% > > > m_data: 130224 B 128 KB 99.35% > > > m_data2: 0 GB 16 MB 0.00% > > > [100%] Built target hello_world_cm7.elf > > > > > > Which triggered the error. After this patch, remoteproc was able to boot > > > and work fine. Thanks! > > > --- > > > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 6 ++---- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c > > > index 74299af1d7f1..bbf089ef48ee 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c > > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c > > > @@ -166,8 +166,8 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8qxp[] = { > > > > > > static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8mn[] = { > > > /* dev addr , sys addr , size , flags */ > > > - /* ITCM */ > > > - { 0x00000000, 0x007E0000, 0x00020000, ATT_OWN | ATT_IOMEM }, > > > + /* D/ITCM */ > > > + { 0x00000000, 0x007E0000, 0x00040000, ATT_OWN | ATT_IOMEM }, > > > /* OCRAM_S */ > > > { 0x00180000, 0x00180000, 0x00009000, 0 }, > > > /* OCRAM */ > > > @@ -180,8 +180,6 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8mn[] = { > > > { 0x08000000, 0x08000000, 0x08000000, 0 }, > > > /* DDR (Code) - alias */ > > > { 0x10000000, 0x40000000, 0x0FFE0000, 0 }, > > > - /* DTCM */ > > > - { 0x20000000, 0x00800000, 0x00020000, ATT_OWN | ATT_IOMEM }, > > > > In commit 8749919defb8 "dev addr" and "sys addr" were both contiguous, but in > > this patch "dev addr" is not. How will this work with new kernel that use old > > FW images? Am I missing something? > > No, you are correct, I think the use case I tested was not good enough. > > If I understand correctly, this will break older firmware expecting > .data at 0x20000000 because dev_addr is no longer mapped for DTCM entry. > Correct. Older firmware would still expect DTCM at 0x20000000. > Do you think it is possible (or reccomend) another approach to fix this > issue? In this case to keep using the TCM, instead of going to OCRAM or > DDR. > To me the best way to proceed is understand why using the current mapping is a problem. The changelog describes a failure condition when dealing with large sections but does not indicate _why_ that is happening. I think that's what needs to be fixed rather than trying to move mappings around. > Thanks, > Hiago. > > > > > Thanks, > > Mathieu > > > > > /* OCRAM_S - alias */ > > > { 0x20180000, 0x00180000, 0x00008000, ATT_OWN }, > > > /* OCRAM */ > > > -- > > > 2.39.5 > > >