From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C58E12F1FE5 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2025 09:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755855462; cv=none; b=OBPf8fbed6Yc9mpxuF9gqpBhn2koxE8EbEFF9l3b6KwZRabISEnV8CCYxT1hLNIxKhKZnwsvVGlYcZf1Ez6A3z6spvLbFMR5jyDZPMxDBKi0pXdq+lzZKt1B/d5rqDHUyKmqvq9Q9VPt5PT/ovQWVR3O4BY2fGZvQ3dRm9FdKME= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755855462; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QgkFZGSFeP9Tyb5OkVgiydGAskriNxja1kg0ydQsDXg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OzWN+lOqbFDVyLQtqe3ypG9e30uf54WstoYKBfFpPtpdIbXHNWgF4YRgqVD5DhvlmyvnzVAScqpykSQTjPyfc0foY22OnJYPRSvGTHF00vWmq/vUAKX8DEz4UQJUcy+Yirm8HBdjqSKrPqMT3GISepYEzFkSZs8zp/caJeTiMmg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=UYnN6/Mb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="UYnN6/Mb" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1755855461; x=1787391461; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=QgkFZGSFeP9Tyb5OkVgiydGAskriNxja1kg0ydQsDXg=; b=UYnN6/MbCdgsHwtSN0d8FYWCUrMJ+N6pqOUOo5YtUNHmOmbCU81xoQTb w2NJbiPvsBkEafWC91aLFoD3qXFTijfvBTm/Ea2jwkgpuhNwVisv7CBPO Z2w6pyL3+PMNi2IxTVJBf+dbzOJFs96ve6noCkqNQz4J2ITVYt6XcU/zb NNbu0U8NYY3n3LTLiS4MpGh8DtMD4zMlVKc3KZdZZ3+QzHwA8XVyVHD7B 8DOkVpJQy9JThQmzdI+klKyZjuZBDreT9+0r3rYgOLDRrQJFWeINHp5pk TDG/B3pPBWo/SCTyxPZPPj2ebgorgvgT/iLku91rk8x7rHK87K1ndSkSI Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: wgzSguxqQOu510GAr7XRfA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: HsoBW+lcR3GYEm1KsExjYA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11529"; a="69599517" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,309,1747724400"; d="scan'208";a="69599517" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Aug 2025 02:37:40 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: a6JIz9UlT9KH8DjMxcDzxA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: EEY/MKcBRMWw+7H5MhgVDg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,309,1747724400"; d="scan'208";a="167907690" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.52]) by orviesa006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Aug 2025 02:37:33 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1upODB-00000007TlT-0od7; Fri, 22 Aug 2025 12:37:29 +0300 Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 12:37:28 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Dixit Parmar Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , Lars-Peter Clausen , Michael Hennerich , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , Broadcom internal kernel review list , Support Opensource , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alim Akhtar , Haibo Chen , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Cai Huoqing , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Andreas Klinger , Crt Mori , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] iio: Drop unnecessary -ENOMEM messages Message-ID: References: <20250822-enomam_logs-v1-0-db87f2974552@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: imx@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 02:58:34PM +0530, Dixit Parmar wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 11:49 AM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > I don't understand. Don't you have a subscription to linux-iio@ ML? > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/CAHp75VdL9kV2fyi63zqPZnW4CaeYPmJ74tmGEgU=M7FSYBv0ww@mail.gmail.com/T/#t > > If you found something new, please base it on that series as it was > > already sent and reviewed. > Thanks. I do have subscription to linux-iio@ML and did check the patch > series you mentioned. > That patch series by Xichao Zhao removes dev_err_probe() for -ENOMEM > cases whereas > this series is targeting slightly different cleanup of removing the > plain dev_err() log messages > that are there for -ENOMEM. I see, makes sense. > As far as I can see, both the series are modifying completely > different driver files without overlapping changes. > Since the objectives are related but independent and addressing > different type of change, I thought to keep > these patches in different patch series and have clear differentiation. > Although to establish similarity it would have made more sense If I > would have added the link to that patch series here. With this clarification it indeed may be applied independently. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko