public inbox for imx@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
To: "Viorel Suman (OSS)" <viorel.suman@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pwm: imx-tpm: count the number of enabled channels in probe
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 11:35:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abGLriw_VJ0MadPB@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260311123309.348904-1-viorel.suman@oss.nxp.com>

On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 02:33:09PM +0200, Viorel Suman (OSS) wrote:
> On a soft reset TPM PWM IP may preserve its internal state from
> previous runtime, therefore on a subsequent OS boot and driver
> probe "enable_count" value and TPM PWM IP internal channels
> "enabled" states may get unaligned. In consequence on a suspend/resume
> cycle the call "if (--tpm->enable_count == 0)" may lead to
> "enable_count" overflow the system being blocked from entering
> suspend due to:
>
>    if (tpm->enable_count > 0)
>        return -EBUSY;
>
> Fix the problem by counting the enabled channels in probe function.

Fix tag here

Frank
>
> Signed-off-by: Viorel Suman (OSS) <viorel.suman@oss.nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c
> index 5b399de16d60..80fdb3303400 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c
> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int pwm_imx_tpm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct clk *clk;
>  	void __iomem *base;
>  	int ret;
> -	unsigned int npwm;
> +	unsigned int i, npwm;
>  	u32 val;
>
>  	base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> @@ -382,6 +382,13 @@ static int pwm_imx_tpm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>  	mutex_init(&tpm->lock);
>
> +	/* count the enabled channels */
> +	for (i = 0; i < npwm; ++i) {
> +		val = readl(base + PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC(i));
> +		if (FIELD_GET(PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_ELS, val))
> +			++tpm->enable_count;
> +	}
> +
>  	ret = devm_pwmchip_add(&pdev->dev, chip);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "failed to add PWM chip\n");
> --
> 2.34.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-11 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-11 12:33 [PATCH v3] pwm: imx-tpm: count the number of enabled channels in probe Viorel Suman (OSS)
2026-03-11 15:35 ` Frank Li [this message]
2026-03-11 15:58   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-03-13  9:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abGLriw_VJ0MadPB@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810 \
    --to=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
    --cc=viorel.suman@oss.nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox