Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] s32g: Use a syscon for GPR

Dan Carpenter
2026-02-04T12:08:22Z

On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 02:54:38PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 12:18:54 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > It looks like patch 3/3 depends on 1/3 but it should land in a different
> > tree, as patches 1 && 2 looks suitable for 'net-next' and 3/3 should
> > probably go via the arm/freescale tree.
> >
> > We either need explicit ack from freescale maintainers or this should be
> > split across subtrees, right?
>
> FWIW normally we don't touch the dts patch at all, unless the
> maintainer chimes in and tells us to take it. No waiting for acks.
> Off the top of my head us taking dts patches only happens if
> the person posting the patch _is_ the platform maintainer..
>
> For this series we're waiting for the bindings to be reviewed.

Ugh. Crap. Rob already reviewed them. I included his Reviewed-by tag
in v5 but I accidentally removed it that from v6. I'm so sorry.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/939fdaf94038613486bdbba510a92a1e57e18c71.1769592679.git.dan.carpenter@linaro.org/

regards,
dan carpenter