Linux kernel and device drivers for NXP i.MX platforms
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	imx@lists.linux.dev, vkoul@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: fsl-edma: tracing: no ptr dereference during log output
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 10:19:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <amhmDM2DWyL3ngRc@nb282.user.codasip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260718131453.A94821F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org>

Thus wrote sashiko-bot@kernel.org (sashiko-bot@kernel.org):

> However, edma_writel() uses iowrite32() which assumes native CPU-endian
> input:

> drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.h:edma_writel() {

static inline void edma_writel(struct fsl_edma_engine *edma,
			       u32 val, void __iomem *addr)

where val is always little-endian

>     if (edma->big_endian)

edma->big_endian is configured from a devicetree setting. It's possible that it
doesn't match cpu endianness.

Could we check __BYTE_ORDER__ instead (or additonally)?


>         iowrite32be(val, addr);
>     else
>         iowrite32(val, addr);

The potential endianness issue affects only the value that's written to the
hardware. It's unrelated to the tracing patch that is reviewed here.

>     trace_edma_writel(edma, addr, val);

The value that's traced is always little-endian. We might have to use
le32_to_cpu(val) in the trace event definition. But again, that would be a
separate patch.

May I ask that we put the sashiko comments asided and merge the trace event
fix? (I'm happy to submit another patch for le32_to_cpu in the event.)

Thanks,
Martin

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-28  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-18 12:58 [PATCH v2] dmaengine: fsl-edma: tracing: no ptr dereference during log output Martin Kaiser
2026-07-18 13:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:19   ` Martin Kaiser [this message]
2026-07-28 15:38     ` Frank Li
2026-07-18 14:52 ` Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=amhmDM2DWyL3ngRc@nb282.user.codasip.com \
    --to=martin@kaiser.cx \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox