From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr (smtp6-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D0CC37E5CA; Wed, 12 Aug 2026 19:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.27.42.6 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786563861; cv=none; b=gHhpEwdaAurr6FKXPwIN1t0ozx0McGARYsyOt5fjlB7QpUPWeyOp9JdO3Hssq+nvummmeK3M9GJebO3U5U9ZzyaNSIrVT5lI9Ld2o5vUYlQ57m9htcn0TG9dQm1XnRCTtnqUzdoZJbTHBODbiW2ofcRtEDTWFu7FeVVapGTqi0Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786563861; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bQWLPAxpNZTOvy3Y+tcPydVvEwDj5MG8HRGA4E3mhPw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=eBjlvOrpEvNjytZCcf1o65FHYYXz31W4ukOz8fEG/v5vKh5uIXXajq3YOFQW+yLw8dbzuij+ehx3QSPLekOQtOaXWmxOLEQHDpr/WG9XHAKSHu8sQBoJ3tM+sT+T5IFseBkRhpIfDa49RXxr9kvbkt3KD5UqVVdSyiHHxdwubMk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=free.fr; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=free.fr; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=free.fr header.i=@free.fr header.b=m6a1LpNV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.27.42.6 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=free.fr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=free.fr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=free.fr header.i=@free.fr header.b="m6a1LpNV" Received: from L30177.local (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:ac2:22b0:f846:40e6:d9d0:ef5a]) (Authenticated sender: vjardin@free.fr) by smtp6-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6748F78035E; Wed, 12 Aug 2026 21:44:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1786563856; bh=bQWLPAxpNZTOvy3Y+tcPydVvEwDj5MG8HRGA4E3mhPw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=m6a1LpNVczu6+eKchNswANMGeO5vS9mE26nKA1Gvz/KQrpJdqm6vLaM0yJsBJMfuw YsivR8uWf/O6MlL3KldMheQTEwW9lx/1jtiwqiqJwCzxqqGers5kuSar8BdEKIC9Xg 2i8fxLDxnDBrO7yEF2aPVYepMXXC2dglguFV5M1kzWOXSWj2xp5oDdY2nzPvzPVTyi j9CN917NGrcy5dMLbp2+FWHsAyREyBi6gHSreXT2U+5DKvYLbYd6oakXBuyCM61XJZ r6nVpme9zdR04I1vig/1VmbOWAqdhvJDFrtQtCjqoerV8//MQzymhFi6kXCfqS+4PL OFzYRJgDyYtzw== Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 21:44:13 +0200 From: Vincent Jardin To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: imx: add I2C_M_REV_DIR_ADDR and I2C_M_NOSTART Message-ID: References: <20260812-for-upstream-i2c-imx-lx2160-reverse-v2-1-f1343714c5a9@free.fr> <20260812193031.CD8AC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: imx@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260812193031.CD8AC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Hi M. Bot, > [Severity: Critical] > This is a pre-existing issue, but does a 0-length standard I2C read cause an > integer underflow here? ... > [Severity: High] > This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but do the error paths after this > timeout leak DMA mappings? Yes, both are preexisting, you are right but they are not the purpose of this serie/thread. Best regards, Vincent