From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpfb1-g21.free.fr (smtpfb1-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.9]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4AE423E81; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 13:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.27.42.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787577852; cv=none; b=evaRRcaUAw31/i1Qrycuk5/p/+MP8KJq24UwqmdUn74iohkD+LTWYWlD9LUjZGKFx23quL0gpcl8f/oxpglgkODuHHXY03mjz5AldXmsJE4nz/pYbpt2x0jWJumZlTPYfNPGBjAkIr/RggTRKLA+EWeGStRKFT/orrfpTH3/tio= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787577852; c=relaxed/simple; bh=B2osEAhrHGA2gHHUZMwKIxQGxD27XlhLVaUjhoWrgU8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SIrs9laIkwLgLF2Tomwjk+isZthF/On+rVTvF7HALFgmqvROGcilarIEinfnL+wTk7w4uLG1zFBsRDwr3pQ2PwCU8zxTjWUN72F2zMScQLqS/CPOBRaqiScgM8QxL+/KGV6nk5D+qEUiVyaVNCBD3Lc336iUauriVUtpWRVlfGo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=free.fr; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=free.fr; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=free.fr header.i=@free.fr header.b=AS1r0fHT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.27.42.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=free.fr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=free.fr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=free.fr header.i=@free.fr header.b="AS1r0fHT" Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by smtpfb1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3410DF92BB; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:14:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from L30177.local (unknown [46.193.67.97]) (Authenticated sender: vjardin@free.fr) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6211A2003E8; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:14:09 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1787577254; bh=B2osEAhrHGA2gHHUZMwKIxQGxD27XlhLVaUjhoWrgU8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AS1r0fHTSHlYbh8CR6VZVM6JiVQyEiIjZUlX4ekuLrqxHBn5Krbha7lnqnds15384 jRuczmKkSLh+KuiLFeQJAeWk4zBrtsSHej4rKjFb+O8s9yasdUeJpTX1iMMGQk3h5N mEpCVSO2E2yc90yXxLGWdW7n5nsfg7xIWtRodWlMpAeVqyf7lQxCCufnzSmuvLJ4B4 HBfB0ZKMOqcPIFMEQu2Bx4+jqWYenC+3txC8A2u7peb3bPJY8gjmRrzApZIUn4t2md CtWzneM6pR4Z9X2lGmjNrEBJpGjqNOcLxhw33RvKDkMkD6ANBTHK7o/qy7GyOfHVZi Sn/tYm3WYspZw== Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:14:08 +0200 From: Vincent Jardin To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev Cc: robh@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: lx2160a: fix incorrect pinmux Message-ID: References: <20260824-for-upstream-lx2160a-pinmux-fix-v1-1-33a3c8d5ea8a@free.fr> <20260823223554.7A6CC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: imx@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20260823223554.7A6CC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Hi bot, Le 23/08/26 22:35, sashiko-bot@kernel.org a écrit : > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider: > > Pre-existing issues: > - [High] The pinctrl offset for `dspi2_miso_mosi_pins` is set to `0x3`, which is unaligned for a 32-bit register width, triggering a synchronous alignment fault on ARM64. > - [High] Pinmux nodes `i2c0_pins` and `gpio0_3_2_pins` specify an incomplete 1-bit mask (`0x1 << 10`), causing the `pinctrl-single` driver to silently reject them. I did send a v2 on some topics: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260824-for-upstream-lx2160a-pinmux-fix-v2-0-0a525d5f4cd5@free.fr/ The issues were not introduced by this commit but they deserved a review/fixe too. best regards, Vincent