From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej2-f41.google.com (mail-ej2-f41.google.com [74.125.228.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 894F84B049F for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 09:10:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.228.169 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790845847; cv=none; b=nGTorlvKfBRvs1F/nByjEIW5Vd6mmeL4yWs+IZ0HxMBoC2yoNMYnW7nWnhmLdraNO2PhkFkrRR/tMP9y5bcoXgjjb2gcpMAK6gLdLXC3TJsumpDgkj+ZUPnHPUet/RO8LkwkCfZqoevbLzZYr5IxYvKuztsCx7drWJ+X+h6L8eg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790845847; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nP4uwT5vKhhI/awkQd5oqbO5S4qnAT6kxAGyn1bp2X0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lAgD3dwAy8uGGIgI68wextlSmww+y8QRmBwtIEjMBGoSLcwVO+yYGHBV1bZ8p3ptTl/f+zkA/Q0vkZeJYFVofZjAFj/8DHi/VpIG88eswJOUpevgcBj9/VcKeto4XyTUPLEiNOV0YubNPkr+jMGWHz6GAgNAadgkNdYdeUpJX64= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=N7KaDFQp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.228.169 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="N7KaDFQp" Received: by mail-ej2-f41.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-c2e3f641442so43126066b.0 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2026 02:10:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1790845844; x=1791450644; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=UudBeT5MtTtLRJzGKTgVM/EBUgESY13lKxlTXfP+GNo=; b=N7KaDFQpOhRg5YO5DZzQvgPF89S7MQ7Jb5Uq1gPdvuujE3QhmfsSo7+UNtuvW+vkYI d/u4LwIByv5Xkhe5kWwc17A3pT7hBCVSZCmQ/NiXEaAEOQTbihssvPDMCm1TmetddKYA EG/afKvT/znviXgiSDFJgUKkY753j3koRcSajEQahmWU4dyVO7DzJmx+xK8ORwHxjGDs o8xpoBCg9aNp5AITfmGcnglXrWaA/CKVScoSnu4dREUF7BQeYF5PECXjyusMkC3GzE30 JQa0NQ6yBvMkGpTGbqP8CLrVOnpMJylqtFRFPhkw0PUWjBxbN+SIYyLpceuEUo3+j5Za xK0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1790845844; x=1791450644; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=UudBeT5MtTtLRJzGKTgVM/EBUgESY13lKxlTXfP+GNo=; b=B2IfuMCTOuqWVv/AwGEtKREnU+XQeqHQtWazrbfXWabfbqayJklHu8ap/irqsRBubv 3A4WMWSk8J+40mDubH1c1iLuTE/YWb3ATKUCUA5INmPcxyw6/O7swk3R6ZV7o0kvZehS D2KsxQ2uc5PfpDTt1ArD0Ls0tKrFp+yr/rK6ZUYXswwkpz/YtT3QTvN8firSYG8NW+AG k3aLnXBVXS2hO16TAqcjiVMyrzx6JBW9icV1qRdMLXdA55bEmH24x+y10ZYTnO50s8dc wE9bwH7JWvKdMqfAeQWPLr/4wsTzwXm5UkKp3vF0u/nhpFilXbquRm6CCcWoiwxwl/+I fXsw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBwngVT9/H36nz5yZvIA8AOY73Tl9HVn0xue2QBnL7Bu8GNv/xBx/dFyh7J+5Xy6ZV/Iwpg=@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++mHnLnFCx7ZR1lDaY0jK1hrthFP2J6lPix+3RbPIJdsX3IyIjeo gk4zMEUXM0586CEO+7VCxrvAbjYRrmeE/jgcHt34xyK/PA0Y3WZz6uKU X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou3idltNx3jVLHVIR/m+5pJlOyCHwLfqBQi2mPauI3eRkdYv3pquxN/edDMe+ag iLIYVvTpTwRLp70FU2r/W92XOumdXMlWzrIICK0MYRZ3XWNhLI2kZ22IrynZhZC0ETQEjjhjOKR 6m6t3HXeFJ+zs6+2yx575aqurk0su8BMA1haDTPFexiPj6BlviyZii9LrkbAYmu/tyMUPpNOcMK 2qTj4lksPJVEY205xgsOtWAn3Xlxi/xAH+TDCoDBtPXPDu5gBcxnpZRUVqK+EThLyCa4dzQP+Dh zleQ/zCZn/0U/AKDnqmUFnULzstWFc+UbpU9pz6fSix1jgQFFosbX7cbLMXPIXb1ioqlje0xCHV npLXFkqjJAommuArGCxVxf5xeKFd1TmiqUbtVGP+XSbbX1FCF3vudEn2B8baMRzjA4/1anJ6DHc zKZKwt6tjxvQz/FAb4N4CHB3zoz6obJy1Aa6+n/CoC/bVtTyuG3LrY1KwhxjMbG0hWaLuxz8A7d hscl7RkbnTpABDaaacfBt8OrFegfovrKpCJj+uKI0czWNcIegD8htwlZbC6Llo+5dUDMOTLpFls /efBgNO1pASnGcgeS355VtQTp9qX X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3cca:b0:c29:4cdf:dd70 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-c2e23e5d1fcmr349826766b.44.1790845843677; Thu, 01 Oct 2026 02:10:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Lord-Beerus.station ([31.27.155.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-c2e31d80d5csm116136266b.51.2026.10.01.02.10.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 01 Oct 2026 02:10:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 11:10:40 +0200 From: Stefano Radaelli To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Frank Li , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, pierluigi.p@variscite.com, Stefano Radaelli , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , Shawn Guo , Joseph Guo , Josua Mayer , Ernest Van Hoecke , Mehmet Fide , Francesco Dolcini , Markus Niebel , Hugo Villeneuve , Stefan Eichenberger , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/13] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add Variscite i.MX6ULZ board variants Message-ID: References: <1e6f9e01bd9e0e0801b18ddc9eb44bde200ea984.1790693249.git.stefano.r@variscite.com> <20261001-immortal-wild-wallaby-23de50@quoll> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: imx@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261001-immortal-wild-wallaby-23de50@quoll> On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 10:09:22AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 05:17:30PM +0200, Stefano Radaelli wrote: > > + - const: variscite,dart-6ul-imx6ulz > > + - const: fsl,imx6ull > > + - const: fsl,imx6ulz > > Is this the right order? Which one is superset of which? > I followed the compatible order used by the existing i.MX6ULZ EVK and had also noticed the comment questioning whether `fsl,imx6ull` should come last. On review, I agree: i.MX6ULZ is the reduced-feature variant, while i.MX6ULL is the more general compatible. We can use `fsl,imx6ulz` followed by `fsl,imx6ull` for the new Variscite entries. I can also propose a separate patch to update the existing EVK compatible order to match, what do you think? Thank you, Best Regards, Stefano