Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93W EVK board

[Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>]

Hi Daniel,

On 21/01/2026 11:51, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> <snip>
>
>>>>>> +              - fsl,imx93w-evk            # i.MX93W EVK Board
>>>>> Is 93w 11x11 or 14x14? can you add suffix to keep align existing one.
>>>>>
>>>> Hi Frank,
>>>>
>>>> IMX93W-EVK is the official board name, it basically reuse the  i.MX93
>>>> 11x11 EVK board, as described in the cover letter and dts patch. I
>>>> prefer to still use this name (imx93w-evk) to keep align with the board
>>> official name.
>>> It's second case, previous was frdm, with the same argument. I don't care
>>> what you prefer internally. You must align to upstream and all NXP boards are
>>> called soc-foo. Not socfoo.
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> The soc name is imx93w, the board is basically reuse the i.MX93 11x11 EVK,
>> so do you suggest we name it fsl,imx93w-11x11-evk or fsl,imx93w-evk?
> As per my understanding from Krzysztof comment this should be  fsl,imx93-w-evk.
> Like soc-foo not socfoo.
If the soc is "imx93w", the physical size / variant is "11x11" and the 
board is "evk",
then I'd define compatible as "fsl,imx93w-11x11-evk", "fsl,imx93w", 
"fsl,imx93".