From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 339B3202C2B; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 13:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755611887; cv=none; b=daNA/ZmdHAFj7dA4h3OqHXWutCLXH+zIQNWWi22x/4fHvvUGtsqnbvcXha2KFC6XhDXXQt4jBChq82vcpUeFUmkpKDOeDY6KuGW68+KysVvYM5wYdfjPMw4Baf32Lg2q3JWcOkuYkawziLIv85fIt7+FcmSDvGJjsyCMB4hIFXU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755611887; c=relaxed/simple; bh=j1RSaqSBfdEgRZZK4r1EKSpaMqq1K5TQ7okIVP5zzlw=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc; b=npwTtuAi02w4OTpoMq08OVjN3Wgt3/eY2jFBWNyCmLoDCr0QrpODfpH/AGp3YTFn3TA387dxNgh8YhXwS7vxt0tGCGJmHq5i76spphkK8YSGNd4c89Zg4UmZyOq9Cieb57qKvvSbj3IdDBexcd/t4YIq1YEKQ+R8DCnCwYepeWw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NxwatY5c; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NxwatY5c" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D65BC4CEF1; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 13:58:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755611886; bh=j1RSaqSBfdEgRZZK4r1EKSpaMqq1K5TQ7okIVP5zzlw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:From; b=NxwatY5crFE7fECYQEVBOyoOpjfP5/45PpoptNh0DX5HMNjlR78x6TXhATmaA+bzq 4Lujs3/Xpx8qVH+EW3iLIDPQfcsLZ5zwfeCgcNaZ7JxiF2qHhJRpXuv3KWeTi0mq6y UEz1EdD23lMfhpqmWrGRowMgtXIy4WnBZx/T0fDjfN1QpgM8fB0DLO8P8mLFH3p7hf 7e8GGuZrDnh8Ps4HHjfe45pI6M4e46Yt8Y7aBMqv+b0744Y+fESCvh32S/ZbKareoS 7BwF3oZAKOWHUNzMZRniG87VfOZfezS5oxkraL1dSiP2NNpYYgtHgn7kWBbw2iHH9g in2WzE4R2PUIQ== Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 13:58:04 +0000 From: "Maxime Ripard" To: "Luca Ceresoli" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/omapdrm: use drm_bridge_chain_get_last_bridge() In-Reply-To: <20250801-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-drm_bridge_get_next_bridge-v2-4-888912b0be13@bootlin.com> References: <20250801-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-drm_bridge_get_next_bridge-v2-4-888912b0be13@bootlin.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrzej Hajda" , "David Airlie" , "Fabio Estevam" , "Hui Pu" , "Jernej Skrabec" , "Jonas Karlman" , "Laurent Pinchart" , "Liu Ying" , "Maarten Lankhorst" , "Maxime Ripard" , "Neil Armstrong" , "Pengutronix Kernel Team" , "Philipp Zabel" , "Robert Foss" , "Sascha Hauer" , "Shawn Guo" , "Simona Vetter" , "Thomas Petazzoni" , "Thomas Zimmermann" , "Tomi Valkeinen" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: imx@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 19:05:26 +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > Use drm_bridge_chain_get_last_bridge() instead of open coding a loop with > two invocations of drm_bridge_get_next_bridge() per iteration. >=20 > Besides being cleaner and more efficient, this change is necessary in > preparation for drm_bridge_get_next_bridge() to get a reference to the >=20 > [ ... ] Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard Thanks! Maxime