From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.nabladev.com (mx.nabladev.com [178.251.229.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E181C30100F for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 14:46:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.251.229.89 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767106011; cv=none; b=ovTdu4SGPo/UM0Jwuhql4mYhfnhhuI4WSxZ1KTwY0J7mA3k5qPXUUAlXZRCjCXBk3YfFrTXzXwxKxQ/k5QZjk+Dzbzbm91QjgR0rKM0xVE4cZ8QffXBC2IPZcdaK7hEvfKRG2iK/48blCxyCAE/h7PpARQuNI04UhU1ShIG065M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767106011; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FOSwBkA6D8wNVzJWuqyTsxlNIrmgXBQDN53+fsjZB5c=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=W8saxBRQzb6mBznfkNIbuJI5tcuvzRfHpohpsOIBr0QOKvYOTTwqzU9wNsrdgb92XiRbCaJ/AQn/oVaE0CnGDtVd/173LrtU08eP7B4mgx/bW+7F5b28dkZmDjkFVajxNuDVibPZqwJYkErBSJgVf2lDGYWm+jDToBfNd1HR3JY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nabladev.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nabladev.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nabladev.com header.i=@nabladev.com header.b=X59Qmf8S; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.251.229.89 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nabladev.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nabladev.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nabladev.com header.i=@nabladev.com header.b="X59Qmf8S" Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 56FD0103014; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 15:46:39 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nabladev.com; s=dkim; t=1767106005; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:references; bh=0W5Lbamk+njEHK9A6i62wmfawW6k35N4fB2QmSx3b9s=; b=X59Qmf8SsAl0xPTK2kQt1HSX6OZQugbq1DDTsOtn/Gd3gXsUB34V3WwVrGvOt1hgC7iqjD lUt7zMY9AFGX9XsOQWn+6FNe0L7cJKoYGWZWvjOIVKXlmzoF3lb8eMfEbtfMfOgB01l0eG 3nwO1xW9NjDE0yfjX/tGQYIEwCYkSNcr8lfxrbmMcorLsd3WrRAVSH5HSqj8BWD+wODM8F Mwt3n9wQAC8ragXjQWsJPCobnQ8rYOO/qQZceq1y/t4kKzELsQUdeQkb35OAYFhnhxiRbK Qv2u6GQka+vMgeA/Eu5IirEC9dKAG5Dej2n3NtB0gOi3OjG5DAij5uDQM5ZdIw== Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 14:34:14 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: imx@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: imx8mn: Add ifm VHIP4 EvalBoard v1 and v2 To: Andrew Lunn Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Fedor Ross , Christian Eggers , Conor Dooley , Fabio Estevam , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Markus Heidelberg , Rob Herring , Shawn Guo , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20251229193706.73564-1-marex@nabladev.com> <20251229193706.73564-4-marex@nabladev.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Marek Vasut In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 On 12/30/25 11:46 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> +&fec1 { >> + fsl,magic-packet; > > Upps, i probably cut out too much context. This FEC is connected to the Ethernet switch. > > WoL for a port connected to a switch? Have you tested this? Normally > you would have WoL on each port of the switch, and not on the conduit > interface. > >> +&fec1 { >> + fsl,magic-packet; > > Have you tested WoL? > >> +&fec1 { >> + fsl,magic-packet; > > WoL again? I don't think WOL is used on this device at all. Would you suggest removing the fsl,magic-packet properties ?