From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.nabladev.com (mx.nabladev.com [178.251.229.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E44042BEC5F for ; Sat, 9 May 2026 02:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.251.229.89 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778293512; cv=none; b=glbE7dZdwNZdgGgmvkIKjt5Fun8W5V7BnEAQJ/PFtqyUj8+/btiOUTojBTnqf/4G75zFx+0A/HRpf6Gqvh4p0hOA6e44s2DDyj8ftJbUeOlAJvSldrDXmXpqB9p6aoQ0rE7rolutmW+B5jzpmGiPMbHF1edu08BxoaM53Y2zEqw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778293512; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1gLrHmaH7ze3TUA14OWHdsqLiAi6ZCfvrAyNi0rJuRM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=G54tUzzjnIxGuSGsYZJnbWZIIJOIvAatsyKWAPCY9aWV1+Q2Dim1PzsbEXdeaxEDX9h/FncbfaKOfuAmH6A7ZtJOVRmp6vD9l8EYyLChQmOKi5HHyirpAbcuJQeO2M0cTuK6KvLBnjZ5YXdfBQq6j9UcMUmL1bw2c82/PaUe2gA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nabladev.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nabladev.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nabladev.com header.i=@nabladev.com header.b=XA0zSWNG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.251.229.89 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nabladev.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nabladev.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nabladev.com header.i=@nabladev.com header.b="XA0zSWNG" Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 943A3113FEF; Sat, 9 May 2026 04:24:59 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nabladev.com; s=dkim; t=1778293502; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:references; bh=Es6Vws/eOKlp6GKSxTpWgYQiUx72bXIcoH8A5zQmI8s=; b=XA0zSWNGfIxfsU8SO9vPVaT8aQl+J5o0UthVWlclapZjE/zgJ7/eZJCXPN2uwMa9juvK8B m9Mi86M8qs7rcfw1wDbLqqGfDiHOuCPjFch5xeWBroP0yeZzFOnt7y0AjBTF2uuAZeNtSM VNhQs1KBv7APWyl4yYTRwFZjiLkjG7BRM+5WHqKJQef/KPWLOxReqyjcQ/3ELrvR9hFSSF 7Y6URWipGU+NTPHQ7xA7VyH4/Bta28WropyrSB0am8ENasGLcJk8KN9G1fSlyA0QB1mJHz 3r70vA694+HII200i+TmUiEApOfhWDXcQ5fxPtrlUhRJv/kjWxoLxTAlR1xXkw== Message-ID: Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 23:47:48 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: imx@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] arm64: dts: imx8mm: imx8mp: Add LVDS DTOs for Data Modul i.MX8M Mini and Plus eDM SBC To: Frank Li Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Conor Dooley , Fabio Estevam , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Rob Herring , Sascha Hauer , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260407211850.79881-1-marex@nabladev.com> <65342735-44b3-4a2b-90ab-6093e0fd91c9@nabladev.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Marek Vasut In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 On 5/8/26 10:15 PM, Frank Li wrote: > On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 06:20:10PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 5/8/26 5:46 PM, Frank Li wrote: >> >> Hello Frank, >> >>>> this patchset is now split. How can we proceed ? >>> >>> I am thinking about it. I found an old thread >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20250902105710.00512c6d@booty/ >>> >>> The current code base already supportted partitial of it, such as gpio and >>> irq map for connector. >>> >>> Internal chancel liu have prepared version by use nexus mapping for audio >>> boards, which almost done to send out to review. >>> >>> I want to wait for a little bit well to resolve or partitial resolve N x M >>> problem. >> DT connectors have been discussed for the last 10 or so years and three is >> still no real progress. >> >> I would be happy to send a follow up patchset which would convert the DTOs >> to whatever connector implementation format lands in the future, but I am >> concerned that waiting for DT connectors will block this patchset from >> landing for a long time. >> >> So how about finalizing this patchset, landing it, and once connectors >> become available, I will send a follow up conversion patchset ? Would that >> be workable for you ? > > We still have times, can you wait for chancel liu's patch for a while to > check if his method can help this situation. Do you know when chancel liu's patch is going to be submitted ? Is there maybe some preliminary version I can try ? Thank you for your help !