Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] clocksource/drivers/timer-mediatek: Convert timer-mediatek to a loadable module

[Trilok Soni <trilokkumar.soni@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 3/8/2026 10:31 PM, Zhipeng Wang wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
> 
> I'd be very happy to collaborate on this!
> 
> My availability: I can dedicate time to work on this over the next few weeks. I'm happy to help with:
>    - Testing the new macros with IMX timer drivers
>    - Converting existing drivers as examples
>    - Reviewing and testing patches
>    - Documentation
> 
> My understanding is that, based on your RFC, we should use two macros — TIMER_OF_DECLARE_PDEV and TIMER_OF_DECLARE_PLATFORM_DRIVER.
> 
> BRs,
> Zhipeng

Please don't top post and something is wrong w/ your email fonts. Please fix. 

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> Sent: 2026年3月9日 3:51
>> To: Zhipeng Wang <zhipeng.wang_1@nxp.com>
>> Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org; tglx@kernel.org; shawnguo@kernel.org;
>> s.hauer@pengutronix.de; kernel@pengutronix.de; festevam@gmail.com;
>> matthias.bgg@gmail.com; angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com;
>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; imx@lists.linux.dev;
>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org;
>> chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com; walter.chang@mediatek.com;
>> jstultz@google.com; amergnat@baylibre.com; Aisheng Dong
>> <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>; Jindong Yue <jindong.yue@nxp.com>; Xuegang Liu
>> <xuegang.liu@nxp.com>; Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@google.com>
>> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] clocksource/drivers/timer-mediatek:
>> Convert timer-mediatek to a loadable module
>>
>> [You don't often get email from daniel.lezcano@oss.qualcomm.com. Learn
>> why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>
>> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
>> opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report
>> this email' button
>>
>>
>> On 3/6/26 06:46, Zhipeng Wang wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> Thank you for sharing your RFC patch. I think the approach is very
>>> interesting and addresses a real problem in the timer subsystem.
>>>
>>> For the MediaTek and IMX timer driver, I see a few considerations:
>>>
>>> 1. Current approach: My current patch uses the existing pattern
>>>     (similar to renesas-ostm.c) with #ifdef MODULE. It's simple and
>>>     works, but I agree it's not ideal.
>>> 2. Your approach: Your TIMER_OF_DECLARE_PDEV approach would be
>>>     cleaner and allow us to use devm_ functions, which would be a
>>>     nice improvement.
>>> 3. MediaTek and IMX timer specifics: The IMX timer doesn't require
>>>     early initialization on modern platforms (we have arch timers on
>>>     ARM64), so it would fit well with your
>> TIMER_OF_DECLARE_PLATFORM_DRIVER
>>>     macro (if you go with the two-macro approach).
>>>
>>> I'm very interested in your approach. May I ask what timeline you're
>>> considering for your patch series?
>>> The reason I ask is that we're working towards GKI support and I want
>>> to make sure I choose the right approach.
>>
>> Well, if you are willing to collaborate, we can start right now to think about it
>> and propose an unified solution
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>