From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: shengjiu.wang@oss.nxp.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: imx8ulp-evk: enable HiFi4 DSP device
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 07:48:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-188900@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029073257.84594-5-shengjiu.wang@oss.nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: dsp node bypasses sim_lpav clock gates
- [Low] dt-bindings: dsp: fsl,dsp: missing required resets for imx8ulp-hifi4
- [Low] arm64: dts: imx8ulp-evk: invalid underscore in dsp_reserved node name
--
commit 66712dd8dcb982bd4722a81d3e966ce66f340e56
Author: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
arm64: dts: imx8ulp-evk: enable HiFi4 DSP device
This commit enables the HiFi4 DSP remoteproc node and its associated MU3
mailbox on imx8ulp-evk, configuring its assigned clocks and reserved memory
regions.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp-evk.dts
> index 4b925832bb662..358554a5e727e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp-evk.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp-evk.dts
> @@ -60,6 +60,27 @@ rsc_table: rsc-table@20000000 {
> no-map;
> };
>
> + dsp_reserved: dsp_reserved@8e000000 {
> + reg = <0 0x8e000000 0 0x1000000>;
> + no-map;
> + };
[Severity: Low]
Should the node name dsp_reserved@8e000000 avoid using an underscore?
Per Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst and the
Devicetree specification, underscores are valid in labels like dsp_reserved,
but node names should use hyphens or generic names (such as
dsp-reserved@8e000000 or memory@8e000000) to avoid dtc W=2
node_name_chars_strict and dtbs_check warnings.
[ ... ]
> @@ -144,6 +165,15 @@ &cm33 {
> status = "okay";
> };
>
> +&dsp {
> + assigned-clocks = <&cgc2 IMX8ULP_CLK_HIFI_SEL>, <&cgc2 IMX8ULP_CLK_HIFI_DIVCORE>;
> + assigned-clock-parents = <&cgc2 IMX8ULP_CLK_PLL4_PFD0>;
> + assigned-clock-rates = <0>, <475200000>;
> + memory-region = <&dsp_vdev0buffer>, <&dsp_vdev0vring0>,
> + <&dsp_vdev0vring1>, <&dsp_reserved>;
> + status = "okay";
> +};
[Severity: High]
When enabling &dsp here, will the HiFi4 clock gates in sim_lpav be disabled
by clk_disable_unused() and left gated when the DSP boots?
In arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi, the dsp node takes its ipg,
ocram, and core clocks directly from &cgc2 instead of &sim_lpav:
dsp: dsp@21170000 {
compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-hifi4";
reg = <0x21170000 0x20000>;
clocks = <&cgc2 IMX8ULP_CLK_LPAV_BUS_DIV>,
<&cgc2 IMX8ULP_CLK_HIFI_DIVPLAT>,
<&cgc2 IMX8ULP_CLK_HIFI_DIVCORE>,
<&cgc1 IMX8ULP_CLK_DUMMY>,
<&pcc5 IMX8ULP_CLK_MU3_B>;
clock-names = "ipg", "ocram", "core", "debug", "mu";
Meanwhile, sim_lpav in arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi consumes
those three cgc2 clocks, and clk_imx8ulp_sim_lpav_probe() in
drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8ulp-sim-lpav.c registers the three HiFi4 clock gates
in SYSCTRL0 without CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED or CLK_IS_CRITICAL:
static struct clk_imx8ulp_sim_lpav_gate gates[] = {
IMX8ULP_HIFI_CLK_GATE("hifi_core", CORE, "core", 17),
IMX8ULP_HIFI_CLK_GATE("hifi_pbclk", PBCLK, "bus", 18),
IMX8ULP_HIFI_CLK_GATE("hifi_plat", PLAT, "plat", 19)
};
Because nothing references IMX8ULP_CLK_SIM_LPAV_HIFI_PBCLK,
IMX8ULP_CLK_SIM_LPAV_HIFI_PLAT, or IMX8ULP_CLK_SIM_LPAV_HIFI_CORE,
clk_disable_unused() clears bits 17, 18, and 19 in SYSCTRL0 at late_initcall.
When rproc_boot() -> imx_dsp_rproc_prepare() -> imx_dsp_runtime_resume() ->
clk_bulk_prepare_enable() later runs, only the upstream cgc2 dividers are
enabled while the sim_lpav gates remain closed during imx_dsp_rproc_load()
and imx_dsp_rproc_start().
Should the dsp node reference the three &sim_lpav clock gates for its ipg,
ocram, and core clocks instead of &cgc2 directly?
[Severity: Low]
Also related to enabling fsl,imx8ulp-hifi4, should
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dsp/fsl,dsp.yaml be updated to require
resets and reset-names for fsl,imx8ulp-hifi4?
In drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c, dsp_rproc_cfg_imx8ulp uses
imx_dsp_rproc_ops_reset_ctrl:
static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg dsp_rproc_cfg_imx8ulp = {
.att = imx_dsp_rproc_att_imx8ulp,
.att_size = ARRAY_SIZE(imx_dsp_rproc_att_imx8ulp),
.ops = &imx_dsp_rproc_ops_reset_ctrl,
};
During imx_dsp_rproc_probe(), imx_dsp_rproc_reset_ctrl_detect_mode() requires
the runstall reset control (and imx8ulp_dsp_reset() uses runstall, softreset,
and dbgreset), but the allOf conditional block in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dsp/fsl,dsp.yaml requiring resets and
reset-names currently only lists fsl,imx8mp-dsp and fsl,imx8mp-hifi4:
- if:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
- fsl,imx8mp-dsp
- fsl,imx8mp-hifi4
then:
required:
- resets
- reset-names
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261029073257.84594-1-shengjiu.wang@oss.nxp.com?part=4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 7:32 [PATCH 0/4] Enable DSP device for i.MX8ULP shengjiu.wang
2026-10-29 7:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: dsp: fsl,dsp: document debug reset control shengjiu.wang
2026-10-29 7:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Add softreset and dbgreset handling shengjiu.wang
2026-10-29 7:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: add HiFi4 DSP node shengjiu.wang
2026-10-29 7:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 7:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: imx8ulp-evk: enable HiFi4 DSP device shengjiu.wang
2026-10-29 7:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-188900@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=shengjiu.wang@oss.nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox