mkinitrd unification across distributions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Dave Young <dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	harald-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	chaowang-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2 1/3] wait host devs in base module
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:58:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120827145855.GA15369@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503B1530.6060208-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:35:28PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 08/23/2012 11:31 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:02:22AM +0800, dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org wrote:
> >> each dev in host_devs[] should be waited in initqueue to make sure they
> >> are oneline before initqueue finish.
> >>
> >> Add a new wait_host_devs.sh in base module to make this a generic thing.
> >> Because all the devs in fstab lines are also added to host_devs, so no need
> >> do same wait in fstab-sys module anymore.
> >>
> >> [v2->v3]: do not add slave devices to host_devs
> >>           wait for persistent dev name in initramfs
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> >> ---
> >>  dracut.sh                               |   16 ++++++++++++++++
> >>  modules.d/95fstab-sys/module-setup.sh   |    1 -
> >>  modules.d/95fstab-sys/wait-mount-dev.sh |   22 ----------------------
> >>  modules.d/99base/module-setup.sh        |    1 +
> >>  modules.d/99base/wait-host-devs.sh      |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --- dracut.orig/dracut.sh
> >> +++ dracut/dracut.sh
> >> @@ -903,6 +903,22 @@ done
> >>  
> >>  dinfo "*** Including modules done ***"
> >>  
> >> +get_persistent_dev() {
> >> +    local i _tmp
> >> +    local _dev=${1##*/}
> >> +
> >> +    for i in /dev/disk/by-id/*; do
> >> +        _tmp=$(readlink $i)
> >> +        [ "${_tmp##*/}" = "$_dev" ] && echo $i && return
> >> +    done
> >> +}
> >> +
> > 
> > I am wondering that will it be better to rely on user to pass the
> > persistent device name instead of we trying to convert it into a name
> > generated by udev.
> > 
> > I kind of prefer to let user provide the persistent name instead of 
> > dong tricks internally. (Either in fstab or using --device option).
> 
> 
> This patchset make the wait_for_dev globally, it will wait for all
> devices in host_devs.  This not only limited to fstab and --device
> passed items, such as below code, for these system mountpoint it's still
> necessary to find the udev name if we want to wait them in initramfs:
> 
>     push host_mp \
>         "/" \
>         "/etc" \
>         "/usr" \
>         "/usr/bin" \
>         "/usr/sbin" \
>         "/usr/lib" \
>         "/usr/lib64" \
>         "/boot"
> 
>     for mp in "${host_mp[@]}"; do
>         mountpoint "$mp" >/dev/null 2>&1 || continue
>         push host_devs $(readlink -f "/dev/block/$(find_block_device
> "$mp")")
>     done

- If these filesystems are mounted on different devices, they should be
  part of /etc/fstab and shouldn't fstab module take care of making sure
  underlying devices are up.

Anyway, I am not too particular about this. So go ahead and post next
version of patches and let harald decide whether he likes it or not.

Vivek

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-27 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-23  3:02 [patch v2 0/3] add --device option dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
2012-08-23  3:02 ` [patch v2 1/3] wait host devs in base module dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
     [not found]   ` <20120823030627.975913807-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-23 15:31     ` Vivek Goyal
     [not found]       ` <20120823153138.GJ12232-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-27  6:35         ` Dave Young
     [not found]           ` <503B1530.6060208-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-27 14:58             ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2012-08-23  3:02 ` [patch v2 2/3] Add for_each_host_dev_and_slaves for device only checking dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA
     [not found]   ` <20120823030628.133563734-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-23 15:26     ` Vivek Goyal
     [not found]       ` <20120823152631.GI12232-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-27  6:57         ` Dave Young
     [not found]           ` <503B1A62.4010905-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-27  8:00             ` Dave Young
     [not found]               ` <503B292A.70707-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-27 15:03                 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-08-23  3:02 ` [patch v2 3/3] Add a dracut option --device to bring up a device in initramfs dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120827145855.GA15369@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=chaowang-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=harald-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox