From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Tsoy Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] dracut 034 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:45:37 +0400 Message-ID: <20131028164537.5e464c82@work.puleglot> References: <5253DD0C.7050506@redhat.com> <526A7412.8030804@redhat.com> <20131028134216.049c6a01@work.puleglot> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tsoy.me; s=secretive; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=kzv/Z7Utg2al6nbvvbc1IjmdqxlAwJhQ4kU7KQ9IVfo=; b=Y9lXYoq01g6LYgqGGWSLZQ+OGt4xjfbxXuF94PkIk6WdrwPRky+OQ83miV8TvC0KbJEWNRmu/O9+RA6nvSDKG8OXXcZ5AO7dizFNrCkYQ8Qy6cH5ryY4mHv8H6mDUns0IYftb5WSZrgZC42KzGIbLky8dcnthwOew3Hey/rOcIQ=; In-Reply-To: <20131028134216.049c6a01-d/9N6kaejYfpx9ONITL1FA@public.gmane.org> Sender: initramfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" To: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org =F7 Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:42:16 +0400 Alexander Tsoy =D0=C9=DB=C5=D4: > =F7 Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:37:22 +0200 > Harald Hoyer =D0=C9=DB=C5=D4: >=20 > > On 10/25/2013 01:22 PM, EatDirt wrote: > > > On 08/10/13 12:23, Harald Hoyer wrote: > > >> Here comes a new dracut version. Thanks to all who have contribu= ted to this > > >> release. > > >=20 > > > Hi guys, > > > sorry if this is not the right place to post, but we have some pr= oblems with mga > > > distributed dracut-034 > > >=20 > > > For users having two partitions / and /usr; specified in their /e= tc/fstab, > > > without including systemd module, dracut does not automatically i= ncludes the > > > necessary usrmount module. > > >=20 > > > Without usrmount, the initrd yields a kernel panics at boot time.= I naively > > > though that dracut would automatically take care of the partition= s specified in > > > /etc/fstab and therefore "sees" that without systemd added, usrmo= unt must be > > > present. > > >=20 > > > Do you think it is a dracut bug, or we should take care of this a= t the "distro" > > > packaging level? > > >=20 > > > Thanks for your help! > > >=20 > > > cheers, > > > chris. > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > PS: the mga full bug report is there (check the last posts): > > >=20 > > > https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D11292 > > >=20 > >=20 > > Hmmm, the usrmount module is automatically included, if /sbin/init = is on /usr. > > If it is not on /usr, normally /sbin/init can mount /usr via fstab. > >=20 >=20 > But this logic breaks systems with separate (not merged) /usr. Accord= ing > to [1], /usr should be always mounted inside initramfs. For example, > openrc in Gentoo launches udev before mounting filesystems via fstab. Same applies to systemd installed in "/". I think there are only 2 cases when usrmount module can be omitted: 1. systemd module is included 2. hostonly + non-separate /usr >=20 > Sorry for offtop. :) >=20 > [1] http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-brok= en/ >=20 --=20 Alexander Tsoy