From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eugeniu Rosca Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] initramfs: add support for xattrs in the initial ram disk Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 17:33:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20220610153336.GA8881@lxhi-065> References: <541e9ea1-024f-5c22-0b58-f8692e6c1eb1@landley.net> <33cfb804-6a17-39f0-92b7-01d54e9c452d@huawei.com> <1561909199.3985.33.camel@linux.ibm.com> <45164486-782f-a442-e442-6f56f9299c66@huawei.com> <1561991485.4067.14.camel@linux.ibm.com> <0c17bf9e-9b0b-b067-cf18-24516315b682@huawei.com> <20220609102627.GA3922@lxhi-065> <21b3aeab20554a30b9796b82cc58e55b@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21b3aeab20554a30b9796b82cc58e55b@huawei.com> List-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Roberto Sassu Cc: Eugeniu Rosca , Rob Landley , "hpa@zytor.com" , Masahiro Yamada , Arvind Sankar , Mimi Zohar , "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" , "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" , "initramfs@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-api@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "bug-cpio@gnu.org" , "zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , Silviu Vlasceanu Hello Roberto, On Do, Jun 09, 2022 at 11:05:45 +0000, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > From: Eugeniu Rosca [mailto:erosca@de.adit-jv.com] > > Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2022 12:26 PM > > Dear Roberto, > > Cc: Yamada-san, linux-kbuild > > > > On Mi, Jul 24, 2019 at 05:34:53 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote: > > > Is there anything I didn't address in this patch set, that is delaying > > > the review? I would appreciate if you can give me a feedback, positive > > > or negative. > > > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > > Roberto > > > > Some of our users have recently asked for this patch series. > > Hello > > thanks for your interest in this patch set. > > > Could you please feedback if this is the latest revision available or > > maybe there is a newer one developed and potentially not shared on LKML? > > Yes, it is the latest revision available. There might have been few > fixes in the final code. You may want to have a look at: Many thanks for the links to the updated patch revisions. It looks like the new versions added a couple of bugfixes and refinements. With more users now using this feature, do you think there is a higher chance for upstreaming, compared to 2019 (original submission date)? Best Regards, Eugeniu