From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Renninger Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] Use udev rules to create dmraid /dev/mapper/ devices Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:17:04 +0200 Message-ID: <2324088.fyCiPkHzWf@skinner> References: <1435330557-17685-1-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> <1435330557-17685-9-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> <20150627084153.1936a074@opensuse.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150627084153.1936a074-stAJ6ESoqRzYCGPCin2YbQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: initramfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" To: Andrei Borzenkov Cc: harald-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Hannes Reinecke On Saturday, June 27, 2015 08:41:53 AM Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > =D0=92 Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:55:57 +0200 >=20 > > diff --git a/modules.d/90dmraid/module-setup.sh > > b/modules.d/90dmraid/module-setup.sh index e8de5f5..b77bbcf 100755 > > --- a/modules.d/90dmraid/module-setup.sh > > +++ b/modules.d/90dmraid/module-setup.sh > > @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ install() { > >=20 > > inst "$moddir/dmraid.sh" /sbin/dmraid_scan > >=20 > > + inst_rules 64-md-raid.rules 66-kpartx.rules 67-kpartx-compat.r= ules > > + >=20 > Why 64-md-raid.rules is here? Probably the same reason why it slipped in once: I mixed up md and dm and thought it is a dmraid rule which should get in again if kpartx rules are used. Thanks for finding this, the rule is already added at the right place: modules.d/90mdraid/module-setup.sh and should not show up here again. I repost this one. Thomas