From: Warren Togami <wtogami-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: ifup async race problem
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:52:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A302B10.5040905@redhat.com> (raw)
modules.d/40network/60-net.rules
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", RUN+="/sbin/ifup $env{INTERFACE}"
ACTION=="online", SUBSYSTEM=="net", RUN+="/sbin/netroot $env{INTERFACE}"
This works just fine if you have a single interface. But if you have
more than one interface bad things can happen. If you have two or more
interfaces and root=dhcp, the ifup udev rule attempts to dhclient on all
interfaces simultaneously.
This can be a problem in cases where two or more interfaces are on DHCP
networks. The udev rule kicked off both interfaces simultaneously, so
there is no way to guarantee which of the two will succeed to mount the
rootfs. In my testing this means eth0 or eth1 unpredictably mounted the
rootfs. The other interface meanwhile is configured to an IP address
and has routes added. DNS and routes configured could be either
interface as well.
Locking so only one interface can ifup at a time wont exactly help here,
because you still cannot predict which interface will go first.
It seems we have no way to make it predictable (eth0 attempts before
eth1) while doing ifup from a udev event?
Warren Togami
wtogami-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2009-06-10 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-10 21:52 Warren Togami [this message]
[not found] ` <4A302B10.5040905-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-10 23:14 ` ifup async race problem Victor Lowther
[not found] ` <1244675669.2871.7.camel-76q0VzFBGGr21HsLBtNmTckMGDeJXHgy@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-11 6:24 ` Seewer Philippe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A302B10.5040905@redhat.com \
--to=wtogami-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox