mkinitrd unification across distributions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Warren Togami <wtogami-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: ifup async race problem
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:52:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A302B10.5040905@redhat.com> (raw)

modules.d/40network/60-net.rules

ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", RUN+="/sbin/ifup $env{INTERFACE}"
ACTION=="online", SUBSYSTEM=="net", RUN+="/sbin/netroot $env{INTERFACE}"

This works just fine if you have a single interface.  But if you have 
more than one interface bad things can happen.  If you have two or more 
interfaces and root=dhcp, the ifup udev rule attempts to dhclient on all 
interfaces simultaneously.

This can be a problem in cases where two or more interfaces are on DHCP 
networks.  The udev rule kicked off both interfaces simultaneously, so 
there is no way to guarantee which of the two will succeed to mount the 
rootfs.  In my testing this means eth0 or eth1 unpredictably mounted the 
rootfs.  The other interface meanwhile is configured to an IP address 
and has routes added.  DNS and routes configured could be either 
interface as well.

Locking so only one interface can ifup at a time wont exactly help here, 
because you still cannot predict which interface will go first.

It seems we have no way to make it predictable (eth0 attempts before 
eth1) while doing ifup from a udev event?

Warren Togami
wtogami-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

             reply	other threads:[~2009-06-10 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-10 21:52 Warren Togami [this message]
     [not found] ` <4A302B10.5040905-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-10 23:14   ` ifup async race problem Victor Lowther
     [not found]     ` <1244675669.2871.7.camel-76q0VzFBGGr21HsLBtNmTckMGDeJXHgy@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-11  6:24       ` Seewer Philippe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A302B10.5040905@redhat.com \
    --to=wtogami-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox