From: Warren Togami <wtogami-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: initramfs <initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Redundant nfsroot cmdline options
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:26:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A394352.1010007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A3898E0.8090700-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org>
> #!/bin/sh
> #
> # Preferred format:
> # root=nfs[4]:[server:]path[:options]
> # [root=*] netroot=nfs[4]:[server:]path[:options]
Harald and I agree that there is no reason for this second variation to
exist in the case of NFS. It seems the separate root= and netroot= only
makes sense for remote block device protocols like iscsi or nbd.
> #
> # Legacy formats:
> #
> # root=/dev/nfs nfsroot=[server:]path[,options]
> #
> # XXX: All of the following have no reason to exist.
> # [net]root=[[/dev/]nfs[4]] nfsroot=[server:]path[,options]
> # [net]root=[[/dev/]nfs[4]] nfsroot=[server:]path[:options]
> #
I'm removing the three variations of the Legacy nfsroot.txt as discussed.
> # If the 'nfsroot' parameter is not given on the command line or is empty,
> # the dhcp root-path is used as [server:]path[:options] or the default
This comment doesn't seem to be true.
> # "/tftpboot/%s" will be used.
This part about /tftpboot/ and the accompanying implementation in
95nfs/nfsroot seems baffling.
* In what cases does hostname lookup actually work here?
* Where does this precedent come from? This seems to be a really narrow
implementation from some specific past software with hard-coded assumptions.
* For example /tftpboot isn't used by default configurations of tftp
servers on modern Debian, Ubuntu or Fedora anymore. They've moved to
FHS-compliant /var/lib/tftpboot. But then again nothing demands that
the sysadmin sticks with any particular path for the tftp server.
* What does tftpboot have to do with initrd? The initrd doesn't have
anything to do with tftp at this stage.
> #
> # If server is unspecified it will be pulled from one of the following
> # sources, in order:
> # static ip= option on kernel command line
Huh? How would you do that?
> # DHCP next-server option
> # DHCP server-id option
> # DHCP root-path option
Do we really want this order? It seems we want this order:
* root=
* DHCP root-path
* Everything else
> #
> # NFSv4 is only used if explicitly requested; default is NFSv2 or NFSv3
> # depending on kernel configuration
> #
> # root= takes precedence over netroot= if root=nfs[...]
> #
>
This precedence order shouldn't be necessary as netroot= shouldn't be
necessary for NFS.
For now removing only the nfsroot.txt Legacy variations as the netroot=
variations are too ingrained in the code.
Warren Togami
wtogami-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-17 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-15 19:46 Redundant nfsroot cmdline options Warren Togami
[not found] ` <4A36A510.5010709-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-17 3:48 ` Dave Dillow
[not found] ` <20090617034849.GA22705-i1Mk8JYDVaaSihdK6806/g@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-17 4:03 ` Warren Togami
[not found] ` <4A386B20.9010205-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-17 7:18 ` Seewer Philippe
[not found] ` <4A3898E0.8090700-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-17 19:26 ` Warren Togami [this message]
[not found] ` <4A394352.1010007-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-17 20:38 ` Warren Togami
[not found] ` <4A39543D.9040206-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-18 7:07 ` Seewer Philippe
2009-06-18 7:23 ` Seewer Philippe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A394352.1010007@redhat.com \
--to=wtogami-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox