From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Warren Togami Subject: Re: The (unnecessary) overhead of initramfs Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:19:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4A7076A9.2000608@redhat.com> References: <1248871245.23840.46.camel@quest> <20090729161655.GG20210@shadowen.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090729161655.GG20210-26w3C0LaAnFg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> Sender: initramfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: initramfs On 07/29/2009 12:16 PM, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 01:40:45PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > >> The initramfs scripts spend a lot of wasted time and effort doing things >> that really don't need to be done: >> >> In the "framebuffer" init-top script: >> >> modprobe -q intel_agp >> modprobe -q i915 >> modprobe -q ${FB} ${OPTS} > > These may be the source of an issue we are seeing with radeon drivers. > That when using a pure AMD system you get the i915 driver loaded for > no apparent reason. I presume these should be -b even if they were > not redundant? > Why is this being discussed on this list when this has nothing to do with dracut? Warren -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html