From: Seewer Philippe <philippe.seewer-omB+W0Dpw2o@public.gmane.org>
To: Daniel Drake <dsd-2X9k7bc8m7Mdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Omit in /etc/dracut.conf is too strong
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:14:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C8F6728.1060403@bfh.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTiksQ=j+2466KRjcPyogX5_iO35VFmshiHoS6GEW-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On 09/13/2010 06:43 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on using a beefy build-machine to build the initramfs for
> the OLPC XO laptop (an embedded platform, in some respects).
> Specifically, I'm doing the initramfs build in the same RPM build
> process as the kernel. This will mean that it's not necessary to have
> dracut (and its many dependencies) installed on the laptops
> themselves.
>
> The initramfs for the XO laptops is funky and includes some strange
> stuff. It is also not possible to boot an OLPC XO initramfs on a
> "regular PC".
>
> So, on the build system, I install the dracut modules and exclude them
> in /etc/dracut.conf (this way, when upgrading the kernel on the build
> system, the OLPC-specific modules wont slip into the initramfs for the
> build system).
>
> Then from the build system for the XO kernel, I run:
> dracut --force -m 'dash olpc-activation rootfs-block terminfo
> udev-rules base' .....
>
> However, because olpc-activation is excluded in /etc/dracut.conf, it
> doesn't get included in the initramfs.
>
> I think in this case it makes sense for olpc-activation to be included
> given that I specifically requested it in a module list on the command
> line.
>
> Workaround for now:
> dracut -o ' ' --force -m 'dash olpc-activation rootfs-block terminfo
> udev-rules base' .....
Why don't you just use a olpc specific dracut.conf? like
dracut -c /etc/dracut-olpc.conf ...
Regards,
Philippe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-14 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-13 16:43 Omit in /etc/dracut.conf is too strong Daniel Drake
[not found] ` <AANLkTiksQ=j+2466KRjcPyogX5_iO35VFmshiHoS6GEW-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-09-14 11:39 ` Harald Hoyer
2010-09-14 12:14 ` Seewer Philippe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C8F6728.1060403@bfh.ch \
--to=philippe.seewer-omb+w0dpw2o@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dsd-2X9k7bc8m7Mdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox