From: WANG Chao <chaowang-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: harald-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmraid/lvm/mdraid activation logic fix.
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:55:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5090932D.4010607@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350907147-26720-1-git-send-email-chaowang-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On 10/22/2012 07:59 PM, WANG Chao wrote:
> Current dmraid/lvm/mdraid activation logic looks like a mess.
>
> Only activate dmraid/lvm/mdraid under any of the following conditions:
> 1. User specify rd.dm.uuid/rd.md.uuid/rd.lvm.{vg,lv} on the cmdline.
> 2. rd.dm/rd.md/rd.lvm != 0 and rd.auto=1
>
> On the contrary, disable activation when !(cond 1 or cond 2).
>
> Signed-off-by: WANG Chao <chaowang-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> modules.d/90dmraid/parse-dm.sh | 13 +++++--------
> modules.d/90lvm/parse-lvm.sh | 5 +++--
> modules.d/90mdraid/parse-md.sh | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/modules.d/90dmraid/parse-dm.sh b/modules.d/90dmraid/parse-dm.sh
> index 76dfb5d..4bc903c 100755
> --- a/modules.d/90dmraid/parse-dm.sh
> +++ b/modules.d/90dmraid/parse-dm.sh
> @@ -2,8 +2,11 @@
> # -*- mode: shell-script; indent-tabs-mode: nil; sh-basic-offset: 4; -*-
> # ex: ts=8 sw=4 sts=4 et filetype=sh
> # nodmraid for anaconda / rc.sysinit compatibility
> -if ! getargbool 1 rd.dm -d -n rd_NO_DM || getarg "rd.dm=0" -d nodmraid; then
> - info "rd.dm=0: removing DM RAID activation"
> +
> +DM_RAIDS=$(getargs rd.dm.uuid -d rd_DM_UUID=)
> +
> +if [ -z "$DM_RAIDS" ] && \
> + (! getargbool 0 rd.auto || ! getargbool 1 rd.dm -d -n rd_NO_DM -d -n nodmraid); then
> udevproperty rd_NO_DM=1
> fi
>
> @@ -16,9 +19,3 @@ if ! command -v mdadm >/dev/null || ! getargbool 1 rd.md.ddf -n rd_NO_MDDDF -n
> info "rd.md.ddf=0: no MD RAID for SNIA ddf raids"
> udevproperty rd_NO_MDDDF=1
> fi
> -
> -DM_RAIDS=$(getargs rd.dm.uuid -d rd_DM_UUID=)
> -
> -if [ -z "$DM_RAIDS" ] && ! getargbool 0 rd.auto; then
> - udevproperty rd_NO_DM=1
> -fi
> diff --git a/modules.d/90lvm/parse-lvm.sh b/modules.d/90lvm/parse-lvm.sh
> index 3e6b371..655d6c6 100755
> --- a/modules.d/90lvm/parse-lvm.sh
> +++ b/modules.d/90lvm/parse-lvm.sh
> @@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
> #!/bin/sh
> # -*- mode: shell-script; indent-tabs-mode: nil; sh-basic-offset: 4; -*-
> # ex: ts=8 sw=4 sts=4 et filetype=sh
> +
> if [ -e /etc/lvm/lvm.conf ] && ! getargbool 1 rd.lvm.conf -d -n rd_NO_LVMCONF; then
> rm -f /etc/lvm/lvm.conf
> fi
>
> LV_DEVS="$(getargs rd.lvm.vg -d rd_LVM_VG=) $(getargs rd.lvm.lv -d rd_LVM_LV=)"
>
> -if ! getargbool 1 rd.lvm -d -n rd_NO_LVM \
> - || ( [ -z "$LV_DEVS" ] && ! getargbool 0 rd.auto ); then
> +if [ -z "$LV_DEVS" ] && \
> + (! getargbool 0 rd.auto || ! getargbool 1 rd.lvm -d -n rd_NO_LVM ); then
> info "rd.lvm=0: removing LVM activation"
> rm -f /etc/udev/rules.d/64-lvm*.rules
> else
> diff --git a/modules.d/90mdraid/parse-md.sh b/modules.d/90mdraid/parse-md.sh
> index 2de435b..80a19bc 100755
> --- a/modules.d/90mdraid/parse-md.sh
> +++ b/modules.d/90mdraid/parse-md.sh
> @@ -4,7 +4,8 @@
>
> MD_UUID=$(getargs rd.md.uuid -d rd_MD_UUID=)
>
> -if ( ! [ -n "$MD_UUID" ] && ! getargbool 0 rd.auto ) || ! getargbool 1 rd.md -d -n rd_NO_MD; then
> +if [ -z "$MD_UUID" ] && \
> + (! getargbool 0 rd.auto || ! getargbool 1 rd.md -d -n rd_NO_MD); then
> info "rd.md=0: removing MD RAID activation"
> udevproperty rd_NO_MD=1
> else
>
Hi, Harald
What do you think of this patch?
And also kdump need this patch. cc4037d explains why we need override
rd.dm/rd.md if rd.dm.uuid/rd.md.uuid is provided. And e064127 which
introduces rd.auto breaks the rules.
Thanks,
WANG Chao
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-31 2:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-22 11:59 [PATCH] dmraid/lvm/mdraid activation logic fix WANG Chao
[not found] ` <1350907147-26720-1-git-send-email-chaowang-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-31 2:55 ` WANG Chao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5090932D.4010607@redhat.com \
--to=chaowang-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=harald-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox