From: Hannes Reinecke <hare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
To: Harald Hoyer <harald-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: initramfs <initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: iBFT oddities
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 09:52:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538ED042.8000904@suse.de> (raw)
Hi all,
I'm trying to setup a machine with root on iSCSI via iBFT
(on SR-IOV, yay!).
But anyhow, I'll be setting 'ip=ibft' on the commandline as per
documentation and the iBFT settings are applied and everything is
nice and dandy.
It's only that dracut complains during boot:
Jun 03 16:28:11 localhost dracut-cmdline[80]: ibft
Jun 03 16:28:11 localhost dracut-cmdline[80]: Warning: Please supply
bootdev argument for multiple ip= lines
Jun 03 16:28:11 localhost dracut-cmdline[80]: Warning: Setting
bootdev to 'ibft0'
Looking closer, setting 'ip=ibft' triggers 'ibft_to_cmdline()',
which will add _another_ ip= argument to the dracut commandline.
And consequently parse_ip_opts() complains here.
While it's quite easy to fix (just ignore ip=ibft when checking for
duplicate ip arguments), I do wonder whether this is the correct way.
Thing is, 'ip=ibft' is not really an ip setting, but rather a marker
that iBFT should be evaluated.
As such, wouldn't 'rd.iscsi.firmware=ibft' be a more appropriate
setting?
Seeing that the ip argument is added to the commandline anyway,
having a duplicate 'ip=ibft' setting does look a bit odd.
And confuses the logic ...
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
next reply other threads:[~2014-06-04 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-04 7:52 Hannes Reinecke [this message]
[not found] ` <538ED042.8000904-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-04 11:50 ` iBFT oddities Harald Hoyer
[not found] ` <538F0800.80008-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-04 12:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
[not found] ` <538F0CAD.5050407-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-04 12:16 ` Harald Hoyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538ED042.8000904@suse.de \
--to=hare-l3a5bk7wagm@public.gmane.org \
--cc=harald-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox