From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C11AC43334 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 11:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5633E11A3AD; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 11:27:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 580 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at gabe; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 11:27:56 UTC Received: from pio-pvt-msa3.bahnhof.se (pio-pvt-msa3.bahnhof.se [79.136.2.42]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 202D111A3AA; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 11:27:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pio-pvt-msa3.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51573F5C7; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 13:18:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at bahnhof.se Authentication-Results: pio-pvt-msa3.bahnhof.se (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=shipmail.org Received: from pio-pvt-msa3.bahnhof.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pio-pvt-msa3.bahnhof.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNTRgXCm1Qnk; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 13:18:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by pio-pvt-msa3.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E19703F53A; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 13:18:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.209] (unknown [192.198.151.54]) by mail1.shipmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9E5C362691; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 13:18:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=shipmail.org; s=mail; t=1655378288; bh=iduCYen/I2Ut2uoofPd3A3NqGUEhh7j9FR2hAk3Js5A=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Zf/3E7XxVNB4wUXRKFOu9oYNID2SoMOz8SHXGNyrKWtzp3sSwv5K7hVpwF1obbR7i Tz76+kW3IxJ8GmEqXZ9N0i2bqr9GhlxhSN2dg6PssMIDE2Ztoo7m1Nd18RWlU8vJnl wnKX/q7DQ55YSoXJo8Y0FQGPmj76cNsFXZYNiroI= Message-ID: <00da92df-5336-4fa3-2ec5-59bbbe8d3fe5@shipmail.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 13:18:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Matthew Auld , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20220525184337.491763-1-matthew.auld@intel.com> <20220525184337.491763-2-matthew.auld@intel.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_Hellstr=c3=b6m_=28Intel=29?= In-Reply-To: <20220525184337.491763-2-matthew.auld@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/doc: add rfc section for small BAR uapi X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_Hellstr=c3=b6m?= , Kenneth Graunke , mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On 5/25/22 20:43, Matthew Auld wrote: > Add an entry for the new uapi needed for small BAR on DG2+. > > v2: > - Some spelling fixes and other small tweaks. (Akeem & Thomas) > - Rework error capture interactions, including no longer needing > NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS for objects marked for capture. (Thomas) > - Add probed_cpu_visible_size. (Lionel) > v3: > - Drop the vma query for now. > - Add unallocated_cpu_visible_size as part of the region query. > - Improve the docs some more, including documenting the expected > behaviour on older kernels, since this came up in some offline > discussion. > v4: > - Various improvements all over. (Tvrtko) > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld > Cc: Thomas Hellström > Cc: Lionel Landwerlin > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin > Cc: Jon Bloomfield > Cc: Daniel Vetter > Cc: Jordan Justen > Cc: Kenneth Graunke > Cc: Akeem G Abodunrin > Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin > Acked-by: Akeem G Abodunrin > --- > Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h | 189 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.rst | 47 ++++++ > Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst | 4 + > 3 files changed, 240 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h > create mode 100644 Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.rst > > diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..752bb2ceb399 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h > @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@ > +/** > + * struct __drm_i915_memory_region_info - Describes one region as known to the > + * driver. > + * > + * Note this is using both struct drm_i915_query_item and struct drm_i915_query. > + * For this new query we are adding the new query id DRM_I915_QUERY_MEMORY_REGIONS > + * at &drm_i915_query_item.query_id. > + */ > +struct __drm_i915_memory_region_info { > + /** @region: The class:instance pair encoding */ > + struct drm_i915_gem_memory_class_instance region; > + > + /** @rsvd0: MBZ */ > + __u32 rsvd0; > + > + /** > + * @probed_size: Memory probed by the driver (-1 = unknown) > + * > + * Note that it should not be possible to ever encounter a zero value > + * here, also note that no current region type will ever return -1 here. > + * Although for future region types, this might be a possibility. The > + * same applies to the other size fields. > + */ > + __u64 probed_size; > + > + /** > + * @unallocated_size: Estimate of memory remaining (-1 = unknown) > + * > + * Requires CAP_PERFMON or CAP_SYS_ADMIN to get reliable accounting. > + * Without this (or if this is an older kernel) the value here will > + * always equal the @probed_size. Note this is only currently tracked > + * for I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE regions (for other types the value here > + * will always equal the @probed_size). > + */ > + __u64 unallocated_size; > + > + union { > + /** @rsvd1: MBZ */ > + __u64 rsvd1[8]; > + struct { > + /** > + * @probed_cpu_visible_size: Memory probed by the driver > + * that is CPU accessible. (-1 = unknown). > + * > + * This will be always be <= @probed_size, and the > + * remainder (if there is any) will not be CPU > + * accessible. > + * > + * On systems without small BAR, the @probed_size will > + * always equal the @probed_cpu_visible_size, since all > + * of it will be CPU accessible. > + * > + * Note this is only tracked for > + * I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE regions (for other types the > + * value here will always equal the @probed_size). > + * > + * Note that if the value returned here is zero, then > + * this must be an old kernel which lacks the relevant > + * small-bar uAPI support (including > + * I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS), but on > + * such systems we should never actually end up with a > + * small BAR configuration, assuming we are able to load > + * the kernel module. Hence it should be safe to treat > + * this the same as when @probed_cpu_visible_size == > + * @probed_size. > + */ > + __u64 probed_cpu_visible_size; > + > + /** > + * @unallocated_cpu_visible_size: Estimate of CPU > + * visible memory remaining (-1 = unknown). > + * > + * Note this is only tracked for > + * I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE regions (for other types the > + * value here will always equal the > + * @probed_cpu_visible_size). > + * > + * Requires CAP_PERFMON or CAP_SYS_ADMIN to get reliable > + * accounting. Without this the value here will always > + * equal the @probed_cpu_visible_size. Note this is only > + * currently tracked for I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE > + * regions (for other types the value here will also > + * always equal the @probed_cpu_visible_size). > + * > + * If this is an older kernel the value here will be > + * zero, see also @probed_cpu_visible_size. > + */ > + __u64 unallocated_cpu_visible_size; > + }; > + }; > +}; > + > +/** > + * struct __drm_i915_gem_create_ext - Existing gem_create behaviour, with added > + * extension support using struct i915_user_extension. > + * > + * Note that new buffer flags should be added here, at least for the stuff that > + * is immutable. Previously we would have two ioctls, one to create the object > + * with gem_create, and another to apply various parameters, however this > + * creates some ambiguity for the params which are considered immutable. Also in > + * general we're phasing out the various SET/GET ioctls. > + */ > +struct __drm_i915_gem_create_ext { > + /** > + * @size: Requested size for the object. > + * > + * The (page-aligned) allocated size for the object will be returned. > + * > + * Note that for some devices we have might have further minimum > + * page-size restrictions (larger than 4K), like for device local-memory. > + * However in general the final size here should always reflect any > + * rounding up, if for example using the I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS > + * extension to place the object in device local-memory. The kernel will > + * always select the largest minimum page-size for the set of possible > + * placements as the value to use when rounding up the @size. > + */ > + __u64 size; > + > + /** > + * @handle: Returned handle for the object. > + * > + * Object handles are nonzero. > + */ > + __u32 handle; > + > + /** > + * @flags: Optional flags. > + * > + * Supported values: > + * > + * I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS - Signal to the kernel that > + * the object will need to be accessed via the CPU. > + * > + * Only valid when placing objects in I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, and only > + * strictly required on configurations where some subset of the device > + * memory is directly visible/mappable through the CPU (which we also > + * call small BAR), like on some DG2+ systems. Note that this is quite > + * undesirable, but due to various factors like the client CPU, BIOS etc > + * it's something we can expect to see in the wild. See > + * &__drm_i915_memory_region_info.probed_cpu_visible_size for how to > + * determine if this system applies. > + * > + * Note that one of the placements MUST be I915_MEMORY_CLASS_SYSTEM, to > + * ensure the kernel can always spill the allocation to system memory, > + * if the object can't be allocated in the mappable part of > + * I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE. > + * > + * Also note that since the kernel only supports flat-CCS on objects > + * that can *only* be placed in I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, we therefore > + * don't support I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS together with > + * flat-CCS. > + * > + * Without this hint, the kernel will assume that non-mappable > + * I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE is preferred for this object. Note that the > + * kernel can still migrate the object to the mappable part, as a last > + * resort, if userspace ever CPU faults this object, but this might be > + * expensive, and so ideally should be avoided. > + * > + * On older kernels which lack the relevant small-bar uAPI support (see > + * also &__drm_i915_memory_region_info.probed_cpu_visible_size), > + * usage of the flag will result in an error, but it should NEVER be > + * possible to end up with a small BAR configuration, assuming we can > + * also successfully load the i915 kernel module. In such cases the > + * entire I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE region will be CPU accessible, and as > + * such there are zero restrictions on where the object can be placed. > + */ > +#define I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS (1 << 0) > + __u32 flags; > + > + /** > + * @extensions: The chain of extensions to apply to this object. > + * > + * This will be useful in the future when we need to support several > + * different extensions, and we need to apply more than one when > + * creating the object. See struct i915_user_extension. > + * > + * If we don't supply any extensions then we get the same old gem_create > + * behaviour. > + * > + * For I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS usage see > + * struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext_memory_regions. > + * > + * For I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_PROTECTED_CONTENT usage see > + * struct drm_i915_gem_create_ext_protected_content. > + */ > +#define I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_MEMORY_REGIONS 0 > +#define I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_PROTECTED_CONTENT 1 > + __u64 extensions; > +}; > diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.rst b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.rst > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..a322481cea8b > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.rst > @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ > +========================== > +I915 Small BAR RFC Section > +========================== > +Starting from DG2 we will have resizable BAR support for device local-memory(i.e > +I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE), but in some cases the final BAR size might still be > +smaller than the total probed_size. In such cases, only some subset of > +I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE will be CPU accessible(for example the first 256M), > +while the remainder is only accessible via the GPU. > + > +I915_GEM_CREATE_EXT_FLAG_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS flag > +---------------------------------------------- > +New gem_create_ext flag to tell the kernel that a BO will require CPU access. > +This becomes important when placing an object in I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE, where > +underneath the device has a small BAR, meaning only some portion of it is CPU > +accessible. Without this flag the kernel will assume that CPU access is not > +required, and prioritize using the non-CPU visible portion of > +I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE. > + > +.. kernel-doc:: Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h > + :functions: __drm_i915_gem_create_ext > + > +probed_cpu_visible_size attribute > +--------------------------------- > +New struct__drm_i915_memory_region attribute which returns the total size of the > +CPU accessible portion, for the particular region. This should only be > +applicable for I915_MEMORY_CLASS_DEVICE. We also report the > +unallocated_cpu_visible_size, alongside the unallocated_size. > + > +Vulkan will need this as part of creating a separate VkMemoryHeap with the > +VK_MEMORY_PROPERTY_HOST_VISIBLE_BIT set, to represent the CPU visible portion, > +where the total size of the heap needs to be known. It also wants to be able to > +give a rough estimate of how memory can potentially be allocated. > + > +.. kernel-doc:: Documentation/gpu/rfc/i915_small_bar.h > + :functions: __drm_i915_memory_region_info > + > +Error Capture restrictions > +-------------------------- > +With error capture we have two new restrictions: > + > + 1) Error capture is best effort on small BAR systems; if the pages are not > + CPU accessible, at the time of capture, then the kernel is free to skip > + trying to capture them. > + > + 2) On discrete we now reject error capture on recoverable contexts. In the > + future the kernel may want to blit during error capture, when for example > + something is not currently CPU accessible. Change this to all upcoming hardware so that we are more likely to be able to allocate memory outside of a fence signalling critical section? /Thomas > diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst > index 91e93a705230..5a3bd3924ba6 100644 > --- a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst > +++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/index.rst > @@ -23,3 +23,7 @@ host such documentation: > .. toctree:: > > i915_scheduler.rst > + > +.. toctree:: > + > + i915_small_bar.rst