From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 657A7C433F5 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 09:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF18910E72C; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 09:50:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFAE110E72B for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 09:50:45 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10196"; a="238923493" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,202,1635231600"; d="scan'208,217";a="238923493" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Dec 2021 01:50:45 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,202,1635231600"; d="scan'208,217";a="481459029" Received: from skofoed-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.249.254.92]) ([10.249.254.92]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Dec 2021 01:50:44 -0800 Message-ID: <041b4bc60800f4061c3355f3fce76cbcc7705412.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Thomas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?= To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Lakshminarayana Vudum Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 10:50:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <163921616973.10522.4137847844050413505@emeril.freedesktop.org> References: <20211209141304.393479-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> <163921616973.10522.4137847844050413505@emeril.freedesktop.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-G9rjDnRf70DH/7AhniS9" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4 (3.40.4-2.fc34) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] =?utf-8?b?4pyXIEZpLkNJLklHVDogZmFpbHVyZSBmb3IgZHJt?= =?utf-8?q?/i915=3A_Don=27t_leak_the_capture_list_items_=28rev2=29?= X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" --=-G9rjDnRf70DH/7AhniS9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 2021-12-11 at 09:49 +0000, Patchwork wrote: > Patch Details > Series:drm/i915: Don't leak the capture list items > (rev2)URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/97804/State:failur > e > Details:https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21820/index.html > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10988_full -> Patchwork_21820_fullSummaryFAILURE > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_21820_full absolutely > need to be > verified manually. > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_21820_full, please notify your bug team to > allow them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives > in CI. > Participating hosts (10 -> 10)No changes in participating hosts > Possible new issuesHere are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in > Patchwork_21820_full: > IGT changesPossible regressions * igt@kms_big_fb@linear-64bpp-rotate-180:shard-iclb: PASS -> FAIL > * igt@kms_plane_cursor@pipe-a-viewport-size-64: > - shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL Lakshmi, The above errors are unrelated. Thanks, Thomas --=-G9rjDnRf70DH/7AhniS9 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 Project List - Patchwork
On Sat, 2021-12-11 at 09:49 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
Patch Details
<= td>Series:
drm/i915: Don't leak the capture list items (rev2= )
URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/97804/=
State:failure
Detail= s:https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_2182= 0/index.html

CI Bug Log - changes f= rom CI_DRM_10988_full -> Patchwork_21820_full

Summary

FAILURE

Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_2= 1820_full absolutely need to be
verified manually.

If you think t= he reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in P= atchwork_21820_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
to docum= ent this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

= Participating hosts (10 -> 10)

No changes in participating hosts<= /p>

Possible new issues

Here are the unknown changes that may hav= e been introduced in Patchwork_21820_full:

IGT changes

Possi= ble regressions

  • igt@kms_big_fb@linear-64bpp-rotate-180:

    <= ul>
  • shard-iclb: PASS = -> FAIL
<= /li>

  • igt@kms_plane_cursor@pipe-a-viewport-size-64:

    • <= /ul>


    Lakshmi,
    The = above errors are unrelated.

    Thanks,
    Thom= as

    --=-G9rjDnRf70DH/7AhniS9--