From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E4B7CD6E57 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2026 15:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD257112058; Wed, 3 Jun 2026 15:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="j1IaolCM"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7416112058; Wed, 3 Jun 2026 15:33:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1780500783; x=1812036783; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=jzlbhVpBj9NwIO2apAPE7A3dS2Xtdemb4Aq9TfHnvV8=; b=j1IaolCM5ZjfLljylyZpJaFZyAk/JCY2AFy91MeZ+q+WOTb/V5xFHdaH XSVvOzrD3ScN7Stj+MJNcKrlzauRHjFT65A8BkwhfTvEBubdBFdHPGcHT L1JK+oabn5Q4VM/IKgKLzeSBqzt4FZIVkL/ulgoJ+aBfmUjhhcjX00efl 0NIdA4k6gG4AcEiW52FYhUPw0Z+csvQTYji1EugktgeBcYUhbw6OnfL/i mKl4Kx2iDYO8BjBmkS81FOgOw0GZCQvbcBckJfnT0DxqghQ8dHcEO9ycP jHmtB1hXQPchpDoahAPhtrKs2wdCdPDOhwtdN7cwlWFm5Qp0kKIEjd3CN Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 07vj0CzaSnqTpNQTZLHgSg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: keXT8a61Sxao/+R8xtZjxA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11806"; a="81220244" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,185,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="81220244" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Jun 2026 08:33:03 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: mc1vyVBmT1+0x5pTIo80+g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: lwWONUymT+aXt7hJ1wN2hA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,185,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="244356183" Received: from abityuts-desk.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.189]) by orviesa009-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Jun 2026 08:33:01 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: imre.deak@intel.com Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=9C=97?= i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/{i915, xe}: display (runtime) suspend/resume/shutdown unification, part 2 In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo, Finland References: <178039485806.35116.2101469529268890207@6beec6c84f66> <9299478799ad973d4e1f9467fedfec2d2e8e92ef@intel.com> <05a8062a90d7746e9c4d693601a407b157ce1d22@intel.com> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 18:32:57 +0300 Message-ID: <04cd2eb7ae058feb1cd26fc8bd7f7af7697f549b@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Wed, 03 Jun 2026, Imre Deak wrote: > On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 04:29:19PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Tue, 02 Jun 2026, Jani Nikula wrote: >> > On Tue, 02 Jun 2026, Patchwork wrote: >> >> #### Possible regressions #### >> >> >> >> * igt@i915_selftest@live: >> >> - fi-bsw-n3050: [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2] +1 other test abort >> >> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_18602/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live.html >> >> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_167725v1/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@i915_selftest@live.html >> >> >> >> * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck: >> >> - bat-arlh-2: [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4] >> >> [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_18602/bat-arlh-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html >> >> [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_167725v1/bat-arlh-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html >> > >> > Imre, Ville, any idea what in this series could cause this? Feels like >> > it could be a real regression, but I can't figure it out. :( >> >> Passed on the next try. I'll optimistically think the first try was a >> fluke. ;) > > The Oops in __drm_mm_interval_first() on fi-bsw-n3050 looks like an > actual driver problem, unless it's a random memory corruption due to HW > errors. I couldn't find any previous instance of this Oops in CI runs, > but I also can't see how it would relate to the changes in this > patchset. Since these selftests involve a lot unloading/reloading of the > driver one theory was that it's due to unproper unloading of the driver > after the test preceeding the above igt@i915_selftest@live test > (gem_migrate), but couldn't see any proof for that either and not sure > how such an issue would cause a memory corruption in the reloaded driver > like the above. Thanks a lot for looking. I didn't intend for you to go into a sort of wild goose chase with this, but to see if you could figure something out quickly when I couldn't. Anyway, this just reaffirms I'm not going to let this block merging if retry passes. BR, Jani. > >> BR, >> Jani. >> >> -- >> Jani Nikula, Intel -- Jani Nikula, Intel