From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915/execlists: Reset CSB write pointer after reset
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 13:15:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bb7cdcd-3122-6a42-a90c-b7d98eb25d70@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180628115908.31933-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On 28/06/2018 12:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On HW reset, the HW clears the write pointer (to 0). But since it also
> writes its first CSB entry to slot 0, we need to reset the write pointer
> back to the element before (so the first entry we read is 0).
>
> This is required for the next patch, where we trust the CSB completely!
>
> v2: Use _MASKED_FIELD
> v3: Store the reset value, so that we differentiate between mmio/hwsp
> transparently and without pretense.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 8531a5b6f6ff..49bf5048043c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -884,6 +884,21 @@ static void reset_irq(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> clear_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_EXECLIST, &engine->irq_posted);
> }
>
> +static void reset_csb_pointers(struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
> +{
> + /*
> + * After a reset, the HW starts writing into CSB entry [0]. We
> + * therefore have to set our HEAD pointer back one entry so that
> + * the *first* entry we check is entry 0. To complicate this further,
> + * as we don't wait for the first interrupt after reset, we have to
> + * fake the HW write to point back to the last entry so that our
> + * inline comparison of our cached head position against the last HW
> + * write works even before the first interrupt.
> + */
> + execlists->csb_head = execlists->csb_write_reset & 0xff;
Idea for avoiding the & 0xff and applying the trick throughout - make
csb_head u8. :)
> + WRITE_ONCE(*execlists->csb_write, execlists->csb_write_reset);
> +}
> +
> static void execlists_cancel_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> {
> struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
> @@ -1970,7 +1985,7 @@ static void execlists_reset(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> __unwind_incomplete_requests(engine);
>
> /* Following the reset, we need to reload the CSB read/write pointers */
> - engine->execlists.csb_head = GEN8_CSB_ENTRIES - 1;
> + reset_csb_pointers(&engine->execlists);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->timeline.lock, flags);
>
> @@ -2469,7 +2484,6 @@ static int logical_ring_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> upper_32_bits(ce->lrc_desc);
> }
>
> - execlists->csb_head = GEN8_CSB_ENTRIES - 1;
> execlists->csb_read =
> i915->regs + i915_mmio_reg_offset(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_PTR(engine));
> if (csb_force_mmio(i915)) {
> @@ -2477,13 +2491,18 @@ static int logical_ring_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> (i915->regs + i915_mmio_reg_offset(RING_CONTEXT_STATUS_BUF_LO(engine, 0)));
>
> execlists->csb_write = (u32 __force *)execlists->csb_read;
> + execlists->csb_write_reset =
> + _MASKED_FIELD(GEN8_CSB_WRITE_PTR_MASK,
> + GEN8_CSB_ENTRIES - 1);
> } else {
> execlists->csb_status =
> &engine->status_page.page_addr[I915_HWS_CSB_BUF0_INDEX];
>
> execlists->csb_write =
> &engine->status_page.page_addr[intel_hws_csb_write_index(i915)];
> + execlists->csb_write_reset = GEN8_CSB_ENTRIES - 1;
> }
> + reset_csb_pointers(execlists);
>
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> index 970dbb3c9812..6ec7c019b5d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -304,6 +304,15 @@ struct intel_engine_execlists {
> */
> unsigned int csb_head;
>
> + /**
> + * @csb_write_reset: reset value for CSB write pointer
> + *
> + * As the CSB write pointer maybe either in HWSP or as a field
> + * inside an mmio register, we want to reprogram it slightly
> + * differently to avoid later confusion.
> + */
> + u32 csb_write_reset;
> +
> /**
> * @csb_read: control register for Context Switch buffer
> *
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-28 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-27 21:07 [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: Drop posting reads to flush master interrupts Chris Wilson
2018-06-27 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/execlists: Pull submit after dequeue under timeline lock Chris Wilson
2018-06-27 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/execlists: Pull CSB reset under the timeline.lock Chris Wilson
2018-06-27 21:07 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/execlists: Process one CSB update at a time Chris Wilson
2018-06-27 21:07 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/execlists: Unify CSB access pointers Chris Wilson
2018-06-28 10:02 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-06-28 10:10 ` Chris Wilson
2018-06-28 10:58 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-06-28 11:05 ` Chris Wilson
2018-06-28 11:13 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2018-06-28 11:21 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-06-27 21:07 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/execlists: Reset CSB write pointer after reset Chris Wilson
2018-06-28 10:06 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-06-28 10:17 ` Chris Wilson
2018-06-28 11:02 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-06-28 11:30 ` Chris Wilson
2018-06-28 11:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-06-28 10:22 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2018-06-28 11:59 ` [PATCH v3] " Chris Wilson
2018-06-28 12:15 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2018-06-28 12:19 ` Chris Wilson
2018-06-27 21:07 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/execlists: Stop storing the CSB read pointer in the mmio register Chris Wilson
2018-06-28 10:07 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-06-27 21:07 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/execlists: Trust the CSB Chris Wilson
2018-06-28 11:29 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-06-28 12:03 ` Chris Wilson
2018-06-27 21:07 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/execlists: Direct submission of new requests (avoid tasklet/ksoftirqd) Chris Wilson
2018-06-27 21:56 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Drop posting reads to flush master interrupts Patchwork
2018-06-27 22:13 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-06-28 3:46 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-06-28 10:41 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Drop posting reads to flush master interrupts (rev2) Patchwork
2018-06-28 11:00 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-06-28 11:20 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Drop posting reads to flush master interrupts (rev3) Patchwork
2018-06-28 12:09 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Drop posting reads to flush master interrupts (rev4) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0bb7cdcd-3122-6a42-a90c-b7d98eb25d70@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).