From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ECE2C433DF for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 12:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 487F120722 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 12:53:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 487F120722 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EF76E049; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 12:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F4C96E049 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 12:53:48 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: JjlJpIiz2vsDZQ7oprGDGoHSGdLI/veUth+OKPWwcKxOiFDnBW5kzNJwhq1OrIxfBFcSj/VhjC m8YsUpW5lrPg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9673"; a="165470486" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,320,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="165470486" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jul 2020 05:53:48 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 0nemsUeCBnyZvnV9E0K1AQzcmdkjIswYR3J8mDaFzKHOKVnFU8GLnDtKJ5L1cRIYNFIoEOAZuy DWjPMIz2QSkw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,320,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="357439034" Received: from mweingar-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.249.46.232]) ([10.249.46.232]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Jul 2020 05:53:47 -0700 To: Tvrtko Ursulin , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20200703122221.591656-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> <20200703122221.591656-6-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> <9c5de4e1-56e7-d6ab-72de-a142256e08d1@linux.intel.com> From: Maarten Lankhorst Message-ID: <0f66e6a0-6588-a315-7d50-bc0986f0b108@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 14:53:46 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9c5de4e1-56e7-d6ab-72de-a142256e08d1@linux.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/23] drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" Op 03-07-2020 om 15:43 schreef Tvrtko Ursulin: > > On 03/07/2020 13:22, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Execbuffer submission will perform its own WW locking, and we >> cannot rely on the implicit lock there. >> >> This also makes it clear that the GVT code will get a lockdep splat when >> multiple batchbuffer shadows need to be performed in the same instance, >> fix that up. >> >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst > > You have my r-b for this one from the previous round. Thank you, will add. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx