From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr: Add debugfs support to force a downgrade to PSR1 mode.
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 18:06:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f77c94248c4914eee9b51614d3ae0e96b7e0f06.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180808141911.7647-2-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 2018-08-08 at 16:19 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> This will make it easier to test PSR1 on PSR2 capable eDP machines.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Remove I915_PSR_DEBUG_FORCE_PSR2, it did nothing, not sure forcing
> PSR2 would even work.
> - Handle NULL crtc in intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode. (dhnkrn)
>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ----
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index a3ea48ce1811..14883614d9e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ struct i915_psr {
> #define I915_PSR_DEBUG_DEFAULT 0x00
> #define I915_PSR_DEBUG_DISABLE 0x01
> #define I915_PSR_DEBUG_ENABLE 0x02
> +#define I915_PSR_DEBUG_FORCE_PSR1 0x03
> #define I915_PSR_DEBUG_IRQ 0x10
>
> u32 debug;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 12fbc59af5a4..a408faa16f90 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,17 @@ static bool psr_global_enabled(u32 debug)
> }
> }
>
> +static bool intel_psr2_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state
> *crtc_state)
> +{
> + switch (dev_priv->psr.debug & I915_PSR_DEBUG_MODE_MASK) {
> + case I915_PSR_DEBUG_FORCE_PSR1:
> + return false;
> + default:
> + return crtc_state->has_psr2;
> + }
> +}
> +
> void intel_psr_irq_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool
> debug)
> {
> u32 debug_mask, mask;
> @@ -646,7 +657,7 @@ void intel_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> goto unlock;
> }
>
> - dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled = crtc_state->has_psr2;
> + dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled = intel_psr2_enabled(dev_priv,
> crtc_state);
> dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits = 0;
> dev_priv->psr.prepared = true;
>
> @@ -820,19 +831,38 @@ static bool __psr_wait_for_idle_locked(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> return err == 0 && dev_priv->psr.enabled;
> }
>
> +static bool switching_psr(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> + u32 mode)
> +{
> + /* Can't switch psr state anyway if PSR2 is not supported.
> */
> + if (!crtc_state || !crtc_state->has_psr2)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled && mode ==
> I915_PSR_DEBUG_FORCE_PSR1)
> + return true;
> +
> + if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled && mode !=
> I915_PSR_DEBUG_FORCE_PSR1)
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> int intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *ctx,
> u64 val)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
> struct drm_connector_state *conn_state;
> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state = NULL;
> struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> struct intel_dp *dp;
> int ret;
> bool enable;
> + u32 mode = val & I915_PSR_DEBUG_MODE_MASK;
>
> if (val & ~(I915_PSR_DEBUG_IRQ | I915_PSR_DEBUG_MODE_MASK)
> ||
> - (val & I915_PSR_DEBUG_MODE_MASK) >
> I915_PSR_DEBUG_ENABLE) {
> + mode > I915_PSR_DEBUG_FORCE_PSR1) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid debug mask %llx\n", val);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -850,7 +880,8 @@ int intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&crtc-
> >state->commit->hw_done);
> + crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state);
> + ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&crtc_state-
> >base.commit->hw_done);
> } else
> ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&conn_state-
> >commit->hw_done);
>
> @@ -863,14 +894,17 @@ int intel_psr_set_debugfs_mode(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> enable = psr_global_enabled(val);
>
> - if (!enable)
> + if (!enable || switching_psr(dev_priv, crtc_state, mode))
> intel_psr_disable_locked(dev_priv->psr.dp);
>
> dev_priv->psr.debug = val;
> + if (crtc)
> + dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled =
> intel_psr2_enabled(dev_priv, crtc_state);
> +
> intel_psr_irq_control(dev_priv, dev_priv->psr.debug &
> I915_PSR_DEBUG_IRQ);
>
> if (dev_priv->psr.prepared && enable)
> - intel_psr_enable_locked(dev_priv,
> to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state));
> + intel_psr_enable_locked(dev_priv, crtc_state);
>
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> return ret;
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-09 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-08 14:19 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v5 Maarten Lankhorst
2018-08-08 14:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/psr: Add debugfs support to force a downgrade to PSR1 mode Maarten Lankhorst
2018-08-09 1:06 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan [this message]
2018-08-08 14:30 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v5 Patchwork
2018-08-08 14:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-08-08 14:45 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-08-08 20:19 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-08-08 23:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-08-09 8:56 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2018-08-09 14:21 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 Maarten Lankhorst
2018-08-10 12:10 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2018-08-09 15:28 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v6,1/2] drm/i915: Allow control of PSR at runtime through debugfs, v6 (rev2) Patchwork
2018-08-09 15:29 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-08-09 15:45 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-08-09 16:35 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f77c94248c4914eee9b51614d3ae0e96b7e0f06.camel@intel.com \
--to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).