From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net>
Subject: Re: less load less performance
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 18:40:26 +0100
Message-ID: <1288546826.18172.4.camel@zwerg>
References: <1288543487.17727.29.camel@zwerg>
	<1288544473.7766.1.camel@pcjc2lap>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 108959E99F
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1288544473.7766.1.camel@pcjc2lap>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Peter Clifton <pcjc2@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, "power@bughost.org" <power@bughost.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

Am Sonntag, den 31.10.2010, 17:01 +0000 schrieb Peter Clifton:
> On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 17:44 +0100, Alexey Fisher wrote:
> > Hallo all,
> > 
> > As i can understand if cpu do not get enough load it will work mostly in
> > C4 mode and graphic perfome slow too. I think there is some thing wrong
> > in this logic :)
> 
> Yes, a little messed up.. try running your test at low screen-res with
> this app running (once per core):
> 
> int main( int argc, char **argv )
> {
>   while (1);
> }
> 
> (gcc loop.c -o loop)
> 
> Do you get the high frames per second (non-full-screen) then?

Yes! it working smooth, with 60fps (i have only single core atom with HT
enabled)

-- 
Regards,
        Alexey