From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Clifton Subject: Re: drm-intel-next forced update? Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:32:18 +0000 Message-ID: <1290447138.9163.3.camel@pcjc2lap> References: <1290446001.9163.0.camel@pcjc2lap> <849307$afgs1s@azsmga001.ch.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-52.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.152]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D60AA0EDB for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 09:32:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <849307$afgs1s@azsmga001.ch.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Chris Wilson , Intel List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 17:19 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:13:21 +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: > > Was this intentional? > > > > + a17577c...5f75377 drm-intel-next -> drm-intel/drm-intel-next (forced update) > > Yes. 2 patches were moved to -fixes and I had left -next in an > inconsistent state last week (especially as I thought some major surgery > was about to be involved). Ok, cool - just wanted to make sure I'd not missed anything. I've just rebuilt (a backport) of drm-intel-next to try the fix for tiling registers on resume. Since you added a Reported-By for me, I guess this is the bug I saw with flash videos after resume? Best wishes, -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me)