From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Automatic 6bpc dither for DisplayPort Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:25:45 -0400 Message-ID: <1319559945.2009.6.camel@synephrine> References: <1318278815-31492-1-git-send-email-ajax@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72639E967 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9PGNDFA003542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:23:13 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9PGNCEi019955 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:23:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1318278815-31492-1-git-send-email-ajax@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 16:33 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > This fixes a rather irritating limitation of active dp->foo converters. > Many such (including all DP->VGA chips I can find on the market) come > equipped with only 2 DP lanes, which clips your dotclock to 144MHz at > 8bpc. Of the standard DMT modes, that means you lose 1600x1200@60 and > above. Since these adaptors are marketed as supporting 1920x1200, we > might as well make that work, otherwise it's the driver that comes > out looking bad. After the fix in drm-intel-next to fix the DP bandwidth math this series is probably less useful, since 1920x1200 will in fact fit in 2x2.7G: (193250 * 24 + 9) / 10 == 463800 But if you have a Really Very Nice CRT then it might still be desirable. 2048x1536 @ 60Hz GTF for example: (266950 * 24 + 9) / 10 == 640680 (266950 * 18 + 9) / 10 == 480510 I can respin patch 2 if there's still interest, but it might be difficult to find a monitor to test against. Patch 1 is still valid though. - ajax