From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Unconditionally initialise the interrupt workers Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 18:07:20 +0100 Message-ID: <1335028064_13647@CP5-2952> References: <1334860909-17849-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> <20120421170024.GI5019@phenom.ffwll.local> <20120421170111.GJ5019@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fireflyinternet.com (smtp.fireflyinternet.com [109.228.6.236]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BC29EBF0 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:07:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120421170111.GJ5019@phenom.ffwll.local> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Daniel Vetter Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 19:01:11 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 07:00:24PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 07:41:49PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Rather than duplicate similar code across the IRQ installers, perform > > > the initialisation of the workers upfront. This will lead to simpler > > > teardown and quiescent code as we can assume that the workers have > > > been initialised. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > > Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. > Actually, it doesn't compile. Dropped. Rebasing fun. I'll pick it up again if I ever get a tested-by on the i8xx irq patch. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre