From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: g33 + dual head = problems Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 22:33:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1336080801_134462@CP5-2952> References: <4FA2BC27.8020509@icyb.net.ua> <4FA2F73D.3090503@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fireflyinternet.com (smtp.fireflyinternet.com [109.228.6.236]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE9F9E778 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:33:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FA2F73D.3090503@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Adam Jackson , Andriy Gapon Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, 03 May 2012 17:23:09 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 5/3/12 1:11 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > Can the problem be related to some 2048x2048 limitation in G33? > > Yes, the problem is exactly that limitation. Except that even UXA on gen3 has workarounds for that limit, so XRender based desktop effects should, in theory, work. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre