From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH] i810: Make XAA optional Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:42:17 +0100 Message-ID: <1341909739_236892@CP5-2952> References: <1341876733-5564-1-git-send-email-daniel@fooishbar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fireflyinternet.com (smtp.fireflyinternet.com [109.228.6.236]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F13A09B2 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:42:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1341876733-5564-1-git-send-email-daniel@fooishbar.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Daniel Stone , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:32:13 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: > Don't build XAA when it's not available, or when we don't want it. Spotted one tiny typo in the configure.ac chunk (s/uxa/xaa/). i810 compiles again with master! \o? Danvet, can you break out the legacy hardware and see if it still launches X with master? There's not much remaining now, a smattering of DRI1 and Xv. Not even a shadow buffer mechanism... -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre