intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/31] drm/i915: move i9xx dpll enabling into crtc enable function
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:02:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1371225737.6507.2.camel@ideak-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370432073-27634-28-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 13:34 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Now that we have the proper pipe config to track this, we don't need
> to write any registers any more.
> 
> v2: Drop a few now unnecessary local variables and switch the enable
> function to take a struct intel_crtc * to simply arguments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 102 +++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index b9be047..b6f5e48 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -1298,32 +1298,48 @@ static void vlv_enable_pll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe)
>  	udelay(150); /* wait for warmup */
>  }
>  
> -static void i9xx_enable_pll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe)
> +static void i9xx_enable_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>  {
> -	int reg;
> -	u32 val;
> +	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> +	int reg = DPLL(crtc->pipe);
> +	u32 dpll = crtc->config.dpll_hw_state.dpll;
>  
> -	assert_pipe_disabled(dev_priv, pipe);
> +	assert_pipe_disabled(dev_priv, crtc->pipe);
>  
>  	/* No really, not for ILK+ */
> -	BUG_ON(!IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv->dev) && dev_priv->info->gen >= 5);
> +	BUG_ON(!IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev) && dev_priv->info->gen >= 5);
>  
>  	/* PLL is protected by panel, make sure we can write it */
> -	if (IS_MOBILE(dev_priv->dev) && !IS_I830(dev_priv->dev))
> -		assert_panel_unlocked(dev_priv, pipe);
> +	if (IS_MOBILE(dev) && !IS_I830(dev))
> +		assert_panel_unlocked(dev_priv, crtc->pipe);
>  
> -	reg = DPLL(pipe);
> -	val = I915_READ(reg);
> -	val |= DPLL_VCO_ENABLE;
> +	I915_WRITE(reg, dpll);
> +
> +	/* Wait for the clocks to stabilize. */
> +	POSTING_READ(reg);
> +	udelay(150);
> +
> +	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4) {
> +		I915_WRITE(DPLL_MD(crtc->pipe),
> +			   crtc->config.dpll_hw_state.dpll_md);
> +	} else {
> +		/* The pixel multiplier can only be updated once the
> +		 * DPLL is enabled and the clocks are stable.
> +		 *
> +		 * So write it again.
> +		 */
> +		I915_WRITE(reg, dpll);

It's ok but isn't really needed any more as now we write dpll right
after this with the same value.

> +	}
>  
>  	/* We do this three times for luck */
> -	I915_WRITE(reg, val);
> +	I915_WRITE(reg, dpll);
>  	POSTING_READ(reg);
>  	udelay(150); /* wait for warmup */
> -	I915_WRITE(reg, val);
> +	I915_WRITE(reg, dpll);
>  	POSTING_READ(reg);
>  	udelay(150); /* wait for warmup */
> -	I915_WRITE(reg, val);
> +	I915_WRITE(reg, dpll);
>  	POSTING_READ(reg);
>  	udelay(150); /* wait for warmup */
>  }
> @@ -3591,7 +3607,11 @@ static void i9xx_crtc_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>  	intel_crtc->active = true;
>  	intel_update_watermarks(dev);
>  
> -	i9xx_enable_pll(dev_priv, pipe);
> +	for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, crtc, encoder)
> +		if (encoder->pre_pll_enable)
> +			encoder->pre_pll_enable(encoder);
> +
> +	i9xx_enable_pll(intel_crtc);
>  
>  	for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, crtc, encoder)
>  		if (encoder->pre_enable)
> @@ -4429,8 +4449,6 @@ static void i9xx_update_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -	struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> -	int pipe = crtc->pipe;
>  	u32 dpll;
>  	bool is_sdvo;
>  	struct dpll *clock = &crtc->config.dpll;
> @@ -4494,37 +4512,14 @@ static void i9xx_update_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  	dpll |= DPLL_VCO_ENABLE;
>  	crtc->config.dpll_hw_state.dpll = dpll;
>  
> -	I915_WRITE(DPLL(pipe), dpll & ~DPLL_VCO_ENABLE);
> -	POSTING_READ(DPLL(pipe));
> -	udelay(150);
> -
> -	for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, &crtc->base, encoder)
> -		if (encoder->pre_pll_enable)
> -			encoder->pre_pll_enable(encoder);
> -
> -	if (crtc->config.has_dp_encoder)
> -		intel_dp_set_m_n(crtc);
> -
> -	I915_WRITE(DPLL(pipe), dpll);
> -
> -	/* Wait for the clocks to stabilize. */
> -	POSTING_READ(DPLL(pipe));
> -	udelay(150);
> -
>  	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 4) {
>  		u32 dpll_md = (crtc->config.pixel_multiplier - 1)
>  			<< DPLL_MD_UDI_MULTIPLIER_SHIFT;
>  		crtc->config.dpll_hw_state.dpll_md = dpll_md;
> -
> -		I915_WRITE(DPLL_MD(pipe), dpll_md);
> -	} else {
> -		/* The pixel multiplier can only be updated once the
> -		 * DPLL is enabled and the clocks are stable.
> -		 *
> -		 * So write it again.
> -		 */
> -		I915_WRITE(DPLL(pipe), dpll);
>  	}
> +
> +	if (crtc->config.has_dp_encoder)
> +		intel_dp_set_m_n(crtc);
>  }
>  
>  static void i8xx_update_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> @@ -4533,8 +4528,6 @@ static void i8xx_update_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -	struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> -	int pipe = crtc->pipe;
>  	u32 dpll;
>  	struct dpll *clock = &crtc->config.dpll;
>  
> @@ -4561,27 +4554,6 @@ static void i8xx_update_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  
>  	dpll |= DPLL_VCO_ENABLE;
>  	crtc->config.dpll_hw_state.dpll = dpll;
> -
> -	I915_WRITE(DPLL(pipe), dpll & ~DPLL_VCO_ENABLE);
> -	POSTING_READ(DPLL(pipe));
> -	udelay(150);
> -
> -	for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, &crtc->base, encoder)
> -		if (encoder->pre_pll_enable)
> -			encoder->pre_pll_enable(encoder);
> -
> -	I915_WRITE(DPLL(pipe), dpll);
> -
> -	/* Wait for the clocks to stabilize. */
> -	POSTING_READ(DPLL(pipe));
> -	udelay(150);
> -
> -	/* The pixel multiplier can only be updated once the
> -	 * DPLL is enabled and the clocks are stable.
> -	 *
> -	 * So write it again.
> -	 */
> -	I915_WRITE(DPLL(pipe), dpll);
>  }
>  
>  static void intel_set_pipe_timings(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-14 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-05 11:34 [PATCH 00/31] shared pch display pll rework Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 01/31] drm/i915: fix up pch pll handling in ->mode_set Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 02/31] drm/i915: conditionally disable pch resources in ilk_crtc_disable Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 03/31] drm/i915: lock down pch pll accouting some more Daniel Vetter
2013-06-07 16:32   ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-06-07 20:03     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-07 20:46       ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-06-07 21:13         ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-10 10:11           ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-06-10 14:34             ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-10 14:47               ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-06-10 15:28                 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2013-06-07 21:09     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 04/31] drm/i915: s/pch_pll/shared_dpll/ Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 05/31] drm/i915: switch crtc->shared_dpll from a pointer to an enum Daniel Vetter
2013-06-07 16:48   ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-06-07 21:10     ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 06/31] drm/i915: move shared_dpll into the pipe config Daniel Vetter
2013-06-07 17:03   ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-06-07 21:10     ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 07/31] drm/i915: refactor PCH_DPLL_SEL #defines Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 08/31] drm/i915: hw state readout for shared pch plls Daniel Vetter
2013-06-07 17:23   ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-06-07 20:11     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-07 21:11     ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 09/31] drm/i915: consolidate ->num_shared_dplls assignement Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 10/31] drm/i915: metadata for shared dplls Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 11/31] drm/i915: scrap register address storage Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 12/31] drm/i915: enable/disable hooks for shared dplls Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 13/31] drm/i915: drop crtc checking from assert_shared_dpll Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 14/31] drm/i915: display pll hw state readout and checking Daniel Vetter
2013-06-12 13:31   ` Damien Lespiau
2013-06-12 13:39     ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-06-12 13:49       ` Damien Lespiau
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 15/31] drm/i915: extract readout_hw_state from setup_hw_state Daniel Vetter
2013-06-12 13:32   ` Damien Lespiau
2013-06-12 14:26   ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 16/31] drm/i915: split up intel_modeset_check_state Daniel Vetter
2013-06-12 13:33   ` Damien Lespiau
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 17/31] drm/i915: WARN on lack of shared dpll Daniel Vetter
2013-06-12 13:38   ` Damien Lespiau
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 18/31] drm/i915: hw state readout and cross-checking for shared dplls Daniel Vetter
2013-06-12 15:04   ` Damien Lespiau
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 19/31] drm/i915: fix up pch pll enabling for pixel multipliers Daniel Vetter
2013-06-12 15:12   ` Damien Lespiau
2013-06-12 19:34     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 20/31] drm/i915: simplify the reduced clock handling for pch plls Daniel Vetter
2013-06-13 11:26   ` Damien Lespiau
2013-06-13 11:35     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-13 12:32       ` Damien Lespiau
2013-06-13 14:33         ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 21/31] drm/i915: consolidate pch pll enable sequence Daniel Vetter
2013-06-24 14:30   ` Damien Lespiau
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 22/31] drm/i915: use sw tracked state to select shared dplls Daniel Vetter
2013-06-12 15:20   ` Damien Lespiau
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 23/31] drm/i915: duplicate intel_enable_pll into i9xx and vlv versions Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 15:12   ` Jani Nikula
2013-06-05 22:52     ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 24/31] drm/i915: asserts for lvds pre_enable Daniel Vetter
2013-06-13 20:26   ` Imre Deak
2013-06-13 20:46     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-14 10:45       ` Imre Deak
2013-06-16 19:42     ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 25/31] drm/i915: move encoder pre enable hooks togther on ilk+ Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 26/31] drm/i915: hw state readout for i9xx dplls Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 27/31] drm/i915: move i9xx dpll enabling into crtc enable function Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 15:13   ` Jani Nikula
2013-06-06  8:20     ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2013-06-14 16:02   ` Imre Deak [this message]
2013-06-16 19:15     ` [PATCH 27/31] " Daniel Vetter
2013-06-16 19:24     ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 28/31] drm/i915: s/pre_pll/pre/ on the lvds port " Daniel Vetter
2013-06-15  8:32   ` Imre Deak
2013-06-26 10:02     ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 29/31] drm/i915: clean up vlv ->pre_pll_enable and pll enable sequence Daniel Vetter
2013-06-06  8:22   ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2013-07-11 14:11     ` Imre Deak
2013-07-11 20:13       ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-12 16:27       ` Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 30/31] drm/i915: Fix up cpt pixel multiplier " Daniel Vetter
2013-06-05 11:34 ` [PATCH 31/31] drm/i915: clear DPLL reg when disabling i9xx dplls Daniel Vetter
2013-06-07 17:46 ` [PATCH 00/31] shared pch display pll rework Ville Syrjälä
2013-06-10 15:57   ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-06-10 18:16     ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1371225737.6507.2.camel@ideak-mobl \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).