From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 00/12] drm/i915: Some cleanups and fixes to the
	sprite code v2
Date: Tue,  1 Oct 2013 18:02:09 +0300
Message-ID: <1380639741-5276-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652A0E759A
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue,  1 Oct 2013 08:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

Chris asked for some renames and assertions during v1. While adding those I
noticed that what I did in the original patch 02 didn't match quite so well
with the assertions. So I modified patch 02 a bit, and that caused quite a bit
of bit of rebase issues for most of the other patches, so I figured it's better
to repost the whole thing.

Changes from v1:
- Move the primary disable/enable calls inside intel_crtc->active checks
  in intel_update_plane/intel_disable_plane. That also ate up patch 03 from
  the original series.
- Add primary_disabled WARNs
- Rename primary plane funcs
- Flush primary plane changes from sprite code
- Add a POSTING_READ() to intel_flush_primary_plane. This shouldn't really
  be necessary now that I think about it some more. So we might want to drop
  that change...