From: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
To: Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Create GEN specific write MMIO
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:22:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380946975-14431-6-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380946975-14431-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Similar to the previous patch which implemented GEN specific reads; this
patch does the same for writes. Writes have a bit of adding complexity
due to the FPGA_DBG feature of HSW plus:
gen[2-4]: nothing special
gen5: ILK dummy write
gen[6-7]: forcewake shenanigans
gen[HSW}: forcewake shenanigans + FPGA_DBG
I was a bit torn about whether or not to combine 6-HSW as one function,
since the FPGA_DBG is cleanly separated, and it wouldn't make the 6-7
MMIO too messy. In the end, I chose the clearest possible solution which
splits out HSW.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index bcb4cfd..cd56212 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -408,16 +408,46 @@ __gen4_read(64)
trace_i915_reg_rw(true, reg, val, sizeof(val), trace); \
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags)
-#define __i915_write(x) \
+#define __gen4_write(x) \
static void \
-i915_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, off_t reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
+gen4_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, off_t reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
+ REG_WRITE_HEADER; \
+ __raw_i915_write##x(dev_priv, reg, val); \
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags); \
+}
+
+#define __gen5_write(x) \
+static void \
+gen5_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, off_t reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
+ REG_WRITE_HEADER; \
+ ilk_dummy_write(dev_priv); \
+ __raw_i915_write##x(dev_priv, reg, val); \
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags); \
+}
+
+#define __gen6_write(x) \
+static void \
+gen6_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, off_t reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
+ u32 __fifo_ret = 0; \
+ REG_WRITE_HEADER; \
+ if (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE((dev_priv), (reg))) { \
+ __fifo_ret = __gen6_gt_wait_for_fifo(dev_priv); \
+ } \
+ __raw_i915_write##x(dev_priv, reg, val); \
+ if (unlikely(__fifo_ret)) { \
+ gen6_gt_check_fifodbg(dev_priv); \
+ } \
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags); \
+}
+
+#define __hsw_write(x) \
+static void \
+hsw_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, off_t reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
u32 __fifo_ret = 0; \
REG_WRITE_HEADER; \
if (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE((dev_priv), (reg))) { \
__fifo_ret = __gen6_gt_wait_for_fifo(dev_priv); \
} \
- if (dev_priv->info->gen == 5) \
- ilk_dummy_write(dev_priv); \
hsw_unclaimed_reg_clear(dev_priv, reg); \
__raw_i915_write##x(dev_priv, reg, val); \
if (unlikely(__fifo_ret)) { \
@@ -427,11 +457,27 @@ i915_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, off_t reg, u##x val, bool trace
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags); \
}
-__i915_write(8)
-__i915_write(16)
-__i915_write(32)
-__i915_write(64)
-#undef __i915_write
+__hsw_write(8)
+__hsw_write(16)
+__hsw_write(32)
+__hsw_write(64)
+__gen6_write(8)
+__gen6_write(16)
+__gen6_write(32)
+__gen6_write(64)
+__gen5_write(8)
+__gen5_write(16)
+__gen5_write(32)
+__gen5_write(64)
+__gen4_write(8)
+__gen4_write(16)
+__gen4_write(32)
+__gen4_write(64)
+
+#undef __hsw_write
+#undef __gen6_write
+#undef __gen5_write
+#undef __gen4_write
#undef REG_WRITE_HEADER
void intel_uncore_init(struct drm_device *dev)
@@ -488,12 +534,27 @@ void intel_uncore_init(struct drm_device *dev)
switch (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen) {
case 7:
case 6:
+ if (IS_HASWELL(dev)) {
+ dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writeb = hsw_write8;
+ dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writew = hsw_write16;
+ dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writel = hsw_write32;
+ dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writeq = hsw_write64;
+ } else {
+ dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writeb = gen6_write8;
+ dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writew = gen6_write16;
+ dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writel = gen6_write32;
+ dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writeq = gen6_write64;
+ }
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readb = gen6_read8;
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readw = gen6_read16;
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readl = gen6_read32;
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readq = gen6_read64;
break;
case 5:
+ dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writeb = gen5_write8;
+ dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writew = gen5_write16;
+ dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writel = gen5_write32;
+ dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writeq = gen5_write64;
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readb = gen5_read8;
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readw = gen5_read16;
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readl = gen5_read32;
@@ -502,16 +563,16 @@ void intel_uncore_init(struct drm_device *dev)
case 4:
case 3:
case 2:
+ dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writeb = gen4_write8;
+ dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writew = gen4_write16;
+ dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writel = gen4_write32;
+ dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writeq = gen4_write64;
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readb = gen4_read8;
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readw = gen4_read16;
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readl = gen4_read32;
dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readq = gen4_read64;
break;
}
- dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writeb = i915_write8;
- dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writew = i915_write16;
- dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writel = i915_write32;
- dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_writeq = i915_write64;
}
void intel_uncore_fini(struct drm_device *dev)
--
1.8.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-05 4:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-05 4:22 [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Prevent using uninitialized MMIO funcs Ben Widawsky
2013-10-05 4:22 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Move edram detection early_sanitize Ben Widawsky
2013-10-05 4:22 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Create MMIO virtual functions Ben Widawsky
2013-10-05 4:22 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Extra common MMIO lines Ben Widawsky
2013-10-05 4:24 ` [PATCH 4/7] [v2] drm/i915: Extract " Ben Widawsky
2013-10-05 4:22 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Create GEN specific read MMIO Ben Widawsky
2013-10-05 4:22 ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2013-10-05 4:22 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Mark gen specific conditions 'likely' Ben Widawsky
2013-10-05 12:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-10-06 0:57 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Remove gen specific checks in MMIO Ben Widawsky
2013-10-08 13:38 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Prevent using uninitialized MMIO funcs Damien Lespiau
2013-10-08 15:23 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1380946975-14431-6-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
--to=benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox