public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Remove gen specific checks in MMIO
Date: Sat,  5 Oct 2013 17:57:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1381021031-28302-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131005123727.GV31334@phenom.ffwll.local>

Now that MMIO has been split up into gen specific functions it is
obvious when HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED, HAS_FORCE_WAKE are needed. As such,
we can remove this extraneous condition.

As a result of this, as well as previously existing function pointers
for forcewake, we no longer need the has_force_wake member in the device
specific data structure.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c         |  5 +----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         |  3 ---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c |  6 ++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c     | 16 +++++++++-------
 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index 0fc9658..8ac8e81 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -257,7 +257,6 @@ static const struct intel_device_info intel_sandybridge_d_info = {
 	.has_bsd_ring = 1,
 	.has_blt_ring = 1,
 	.has_llc = 1,
-	.has_force_wake = 1,
 };
 
 static const struct intel_device_info intel_sandybridge_m_info = {
@@ -267,7 +266,6 @@ static const struct intel_device_info intel_sandybridge_m_info = {
 	.has_bsd_ring = 1,
 	.has_blt_ring = 1,
 	.has_llc = 1,
-	.has_force_wake = 1,
 };
 
 #define GEN7_FEATURES  \
@@ -275,8 +273,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info intel_sandybridge_m_info = {
 	.need_gfx_hws = 1, .has_hotplug = 1, \
 	.has_bsd_ring = 1, \
 	.has_blt_ring = 1, \
-	.has_llc = 1, \
-	.has_force_wake = 1
+	.has_llc = 1
 
 static const struct intel_device_info intel_ivybridge_d_info = {
 	GEN7_FEATURES,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index a054b30..ee9cbe2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -441,7 +441,6 @@ struct intel_uncore {
 	func(is_valleyview) sep \
 	func(is_haswell) sep \
 	func(is_preliminary) sep \
-	func(has_force_wake) sep \
 	func(has_fbc) sep \
 	func(has_pipe_cxsr) sep \
 	func(has_hotplug) sep \
@@ -1729,8 +1728,6 @@ struct drm_i915_file_private {
 #define HAS_PCH_NOP(dev) (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev) == PCH_NOP)
 #define HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev) (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev) != PCH_NONE)
 
-#define HAS_FORCE_WAKE(dev) (INTEL_INFO(dev)->has_force_wake)
-
 /* DPF == dynamic parity feature */
 #define HAS_L3_DPF(dev) (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev) || IS_HASWELL(dev))
 #define NUM_L3_SLICES(dev) (IS_HSW_GT3(dev) ? 2 : HAS_L3_DPF(dev))
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index b67104a..4e108fc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -395,8 +395,7 @@ static int init_ring_common(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
 	int ret = 0;
 	u32 head;
 
-	if (HAS_FORCE_WAKE(dev))
-		gen6_gt_force_wake_get(dev_priv);
+	gen6_gt_force_wake_get(dev_priv);
 
 	if (I915_NEED_GFX_HWS(dev))
 		intel_ring_setup_status_page(ring);
@@ -469,8 +468,7 @@ static int init_ring_common(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
 	memset(&ring->hangcheck, 0, sizeof(ring->hangcheck));
 
 out:
-	if (HAS_FORCE_WAKE(dev))
-		gen6_gt_force_wake_put(dev_priv);
+	gen6_gt_force_wake_put(dev_priv);
 
 	return ret;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index cd56212..446288e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -282,6 +282,9 @@ void gen6_gt_force_wake_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
 	unsigned long irqflags;
 
+	if (!dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get)
+		return;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
 	if (dev_priv->uncore.forcewake_count++ == 0)
 		dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get(dev_priv);
@@ -295,6 +298,9 @@ void gen6_gt_force_wake_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
 	unsigned long irqflags;
 
+	if (!dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_put)
+		return;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
 	if (--dev_priv->uncore.forcewake_count == 0) {
 		dev_priv->uncore.forcewake_count++;
@@ -307,9 +313,7 @@ void gen6_gt_force_wake_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 
 /* We give fast paths for the really cool registers */
 #define NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE(dev_priv, reg) \
-	((HAS_FORCE_WAKE((dev_priv)->dev)) && \
-	 ((reg) < 0x40000) &&            \
-	 ((reg) != FORCEWAKE))
+	 ((reg) < 0x40000 && (reg) != FORCEWAKE)
 
 static void
 ilk_dummy_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -323,8 +327,7 @@ ilk_dummy_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 static void
 hsw_unclaimed_reg_clear(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
 {
-	if (HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED(dev_priv->dev) &&
-	    (__raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, FPGA_DBG) & FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM)) {
+	if (__raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, FPGA_DBG) & FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM) {
 		DRM_ERROR("Unknown unclaimed register before writing to %x\n",
 			  reg);
 		__raw_i915_write32(dev_priv, FPGA_DBG, FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM);
@@ -334,8 +337,7 @@ hsw_unclaimed_reg_clear(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
 static void
 hsw_unclaimed_reg_check(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg)
 {
-	if (HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED(dev_priv->dev) &&
-	    (__raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, FPGA_DBG) & FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM)) {
+	if (__raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, FPGA_DBG) & FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM) {
 		DRM_ERROR("Unclaimed write to %x\n", reg);
 		__raw_i915_write32(dev_priv, FPGA_DBG, FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM);
 	}
-- 
1.8.4

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-06  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-05  4:22 [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Prevent using uninitialized MMIO funcs Ben Widawsky
2013-10-05  4:22 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Move edram detection early_sanitize Ben Widawsky
2013-10-05  4:22 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Create MMIO virtual functions Ben Widawsky
2013-10-05  4:22 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Extra common MMIO lines Ben Widawsky
2013-10-05  4:24   ` [PATCH 4/7] [v2] drm/i915: Extract " Ben Widawsky
2013-10-05  4:22 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Create GEN specific read MMIO Ben Widawsky
2013-10-05  4:22 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Create GEN specific write MMIO Ben Widawsky
2013-10-05  4:22 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Mark gen specific conditions 'likely' Ben Widawsky
2013-10-05 12:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2013-10-06  0:57     ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2013-10-08 13:38 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Prevent using uninitialized MMIO funcs Damien Lespiau
2013-10-08 15:23   ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1381021031-28302-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
    --to=benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox