From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: enable only the needed power domains during modeset
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 12:02:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1382518964.2523.17.camel@ideak-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+gsUGS=ni4oKAqJwdBG0zvDsXXzk92fM=wqRXqfYO=yNtWmPQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 18:07 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2013/10/18 Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>:
> > On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:25:52 +0300
> > Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> So far the modeset code enabled all power domains if it needed any. It
> >> wasn't a problem since HW generations so far only had one always-on
> >> power well and one dynamic power well that can be enabled/disabled. For
> >> domains powered by always-on power wells (panel fitter on pipe A and the
> >> eDP transcoder) we didn't do anything, for all other domains we just
> >> enabled the single dynamic power well.
> >>
> >> Future HW generations will change this, as they add multiple dynamic
> >> power wells. Support for these will be added later, this patch prepares
> >> for those by making sure we only enable the required domains.
> >>
> >> Note that after this change on HSW we'll enable all power domains even
> >> if it was the domain for the panel fitter on pipe A or the eDP
> >> transcoder. This isn't a problem since the power domain framework
> >> already checks if the domain is on an always-on power well and doesn't
> >> do anything in this case.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>
> I updated drm-intel-nightly and now when I boot Haswell with eDP-only,
> the power well is enabled, where it should be disabled. Reverting this
> patch fixes the problem for me.
As discussed on IRC, this broke b/c of a missing call to
intel_display_set_init_power() in modeset_update_power_wells(). I added
it only in patch 6/6, but that isn't applied yet since I had to rework
it. I've posted a v2 for this patch already, it should fix the issue.
Thanks for catching this.
--Imre
>
>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 +
> >> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> index 8e734f2..e2a4f3b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> @@ -6561,21 +6561,57 @@ static void hsw_package_c8_gpu_busy(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> +#define for_each_power_domain(domain, mask) \
> >> + for ((domain) = 0; (domain) < POWER_DOMAIN_NUM; (domain)++) \
> >> + if ((1 << (domain)) & (mask))
> >> +
> >> +static unsigned long get_pipe_power_domains(struct drm_device *dev,
> >> + enum pipe pipe, bool pfit_enabled)
> >> +{
> >> + unsigned long mask;
> >> + enum transcoder transcoder;
> >> +
> >> + transcoder = intel_pipe_to_cpu_transcoder(dev->dev_private, pipe);
> >> +
> >> + mask = BIT(POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE(pipe));
> >> + mask |= BIT(POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER(transcoder));
> >> + if (pfit_enabled)
> >> + mask |= BIT(POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_PANEL_FITTER(pipe));
> >> +
> >> + return mask;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static void modeset_update_power_wells(struct drm_device *dev)
> >> {
> >> - bool enable = false;
> >> + unsigned long pipe_domains[I915_MAX_PIPES] = { 0, };
> >> struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> >>
> >> + /*
> >> + * First get all needed power domains, then put all unneeded, to avoid
> >> + * any unnecessary toggling of the power wells.
> >> + */
> >> list_for_each_entry(crtc, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, base.head) {
> >> + enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
> >> +
> >> if (!crtc->base.enabled)
> >> continue;
> >>
> >> - if (crtc->pipe != PIPE_A || crtc->config.pch_pfit.enabled ||
> >> - crtc->config.cpu_transcoder != TRANSCODER_EDP)
> >> - enable = true;
> >> + pipe_domains[crtc->pipe] = get_pipe_power_domains(dev,
> >> + crtc->pipe,
> >> + crtc->config.pch_pfit.enabled);
> >> +
> >> + for_each_power_domain(domain, pipe_domains[crtc->pipe])
> >> + intel_display_power_get(dev, domain);
> >> }
> >>
> >> - intel_set_power_well(dev, enable);
> >> + list_for_each_entry(crtc, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, base.head) {
> >> + enum intel_display_power_domain domain;
> >> +
> >> + for_each_power_domain(domain, crtc->enabled_power_domains)
> >> + intel_display_power_put(dev, domain);
> >> +
> >> + crtc->enabled_power_domains = pipe_domains[crtc->pipe];
> >> + }
> >> }
> >>
> >> static void haswell_modeset_global_resources(struct drm_device *dev)
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> >> index 189257d..63a5bfd 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> >> @@ -320,6 +320,7 @@ struct intel_crtc {
> >> * some outputs connected to this crtc.
> >> */
> >> bool active;
> >> + unsigned long enabled_power_domains;
> >> bool eld_vld;
> >> bool primary_enabled; /* is the primary plane (partially) visible? */
> >> bool lowfreq_avail;
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> >
> > Hope we can get rid of the set_power_well() function soon...
> >
> > --
> > Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-23 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-16 14:25 [PATCH 0/6] preparation for multiple power-wells Imre Deak
2013-10-16 14:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: make the intel_display_power_domain enum compact Imre Deak
2013-10-18 18:48 ` Jesse Barnes
2013-10-16 14:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: factor out is_always_on_domain Imre Deak
2013-10-18 18:49 ` Jesse Barnes
2013-10-16 14:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: change power_well->lock to be mutex Imre Deak
2013-10-16 16:19 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-10-16 16:31 ` Imre Deak
2013-10-18 18:50 ` Jesse Barnes
2013-10-19 11:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-10-16 14:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: factor out modeset_update_power_wells Imre Deak
2013-10-18 18:51 ` Jesse Barnes
2013-10-16 14:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: enable only the needed power domains during modeset Imre Deak
2013-10-18 18:53 ` Jesse Barnes
2013-10-22 20:07 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-10-23 9:02 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2013-10-16 14:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: use power get/put instead of set for power on after init Imre Deak
2013-10-18 18:56 ` Jesse Barnes
2013-10-21 19:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-10-22 17:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: prepare for multiple power wells Imre Deak
2013-10-22 17:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: use power get/put instead of set for power on after init Imre Deak
2013-10-23 13:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: prepare for multiple power wells Paulo Zanoni
2013-10-23 14:46 ` Imre Deak
2013-10-25 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] " Imre Deak
2013-10-25 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/i915: " Imre Deak
2013-10-25 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/i915: use power get/put instead of set for power on after init Imre Deak
2013-10-25 19:31 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-10-25 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/i915: remove device field from struct power_well Imre Deak
2013-10-25 19:50 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-10-27 19:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-10-28 17:41 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-10-28 18:31 ` Imre Deak
2013-10-25 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/i915: rename i915_init_power_well to i915_init_power_domains Imre Deak
2013-10-25 20:10 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-10-27 12:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-10-28 15:20 ` [PATCH v4] drm/i915: rename i915_init_power_well to init_power_domains_init Imre Deak
2013-10-28 18:51 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-10-29 17:53 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1382518964.2523.17.camel@ideak-mobl \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=przanoni@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).