public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: kill dev_priv->pc8.gpu_idle
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:52:24 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1393001548-2883-8-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393001548-2883-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>

From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>

Since the addition of dev_priv->mm.busy, there's no more need for
dev_priv->pc8.gpu_idle, so kill it.

Notice that when you remove gpu_idle, hsw_package_c8_gpu_idle and
hsw_package_c8_gpu_busy become identical to hsw_enable_package_c8 and
hsw_disable_package_c8, so just use them.

Also, when we boot the machine, dev_priv->mm.busy initially considers
the machine as idle. This is opposed to dev_priv->pc8.gpu_idle, which
considered it busy. So dev_priv->pc8.disable_count has to be
initalized to 1 now.

Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c  |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h      | 10 ++++------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 30 ++----------------------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      |  3 +--
 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 34e347f..62d0c0915 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -2014,7 +2014,7 @@ static int i915_pc8_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pc8.lock);
 	seq_printf(m, "Requirements met: %s\n",
 		   yesno(dev_priv->pc8.requirements_met));
-	seq_printf(m, "GPU idle: %s\n", yesno(dev_priv->pc8.gpu_idle));
+	seq_printf(m, "GPU idle: %s\n", yesno(!dev_priv->mm.busy));
 	seq_printf(m, "Disable count: %d\n", dev_priv->pc8.disable_count);
 	seq_printf(m, "IRQs disabled: %s\n",
 		   yesno(dev_priv->pc8.irqs_disabled));
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index a5caa7e..2a2a3a9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1321,11 +1321,10 @@ struct ilk_wm_values {
  * Ideally every piece of our code that needs PC8+ disabled would call
  * hsw_disable_package_c8, which would increment disable_count and prevent the
  * system from reaching PC8+. But we don't have a symmetric way to do this for
- * everything, so we have the requirements_met and gpu_idle variables. When we
- * switch requirements_met or gpu_idle to true we decrease disable_count, and
- * increase it in the opposite case. The requirements_met variable is true when
- * all the CRTCs, encoders and the power well are disabled. The gpu_idle
- * variable is true when the GPU is idle.
+ * everything, so we have the requirements_met variable. When we switch
+ * requirements_met to true we decrease disable_count, and increase it in the
+ * opposite case. The requirements_met variable is true when all the CRTCs,
+ * encoders and the power well are disabled.
  *
  * In addition to everything, we only actually enable PC8+ if disable_count
  * stays at zero for at least some seconds. This is implemented with the
@@ -1348,7 +1347,6 @@ struct ilk_wm_values {
  */
 struct i915_package_c8 {
 	bool requirements_met;
-	bool gpu_idle;
 	bool irqs_disabled;
 	/* Only true after the delayed work task actually enables it. */
 	bool enabled;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index c64fb7f..796a116 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -6812,32 +6812,6 @@ done:
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pc8.lock);
 }
 
-static void hsw_package_c8_gpu_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
-{
-	if (!HAS_PC8(dev_priv->dev))
-		return;
-
-	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pc8.lock);
-	if (!dev_priv->pc8.gpu_idle) {
-		dev_priv->pc8.gpu_idle = true;
-		__hsw_enable_package_c8(dev_priv);
-	}
-	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pc8.lock);
-}
-
-static void hsw_package_c8_gpu_busy(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
-{
-	if (!HAS_PC8(dev_priv->dev))
-		return;
-
-	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pc8.lock);
-	if (dev_priv->pc8.gpu_idle) {
-		dev_priv->pc8.gpu_idle = false;
-		__hsw_disable_package_c8(dev_priv);
-	}
-	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pc8.lock);
-}
-
 #define for_each_power_domain(domain, mask)				\
 	for ((domain) = 0; (domain) < POWER_DOMAIN_NUM; (domain)++)	\
 		if ((1 << (domain)) & (mask))
@@ -8195,7 +8169,7 @@ void intel_mark_busy(struct drm_device *dev)
 	if (dev_priv->mm.busy)
 		return;
 
-	hsw_package_c8_gpu_busy(dev_priv);
+	hsw_disable_package_c8(dev_priv);
 	i915_update_gfx_val(dev_priv);
 	dev_priv->mm.busy = true;
 }
@@ -8224,7 +8198,7 @@ void intel_mark_idle(struct drm_device *dev)
 		gen6_rps_idle(dev->dev_private);
 
 out:
-	hsw_package_c8_gpu_idle(dev_priv);
+	hsw_enable_package_c8(dev_priv);
 }
 
 void intel_mark_fb_busy(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index a6b877a..50b80bb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -5786,10 +5786,9 @@ void intel_pm_setup(struct drm_device *dev)
 
 	mutex_init(&dev_priv->pc8.lock);
 	dev_priv->pc8.requirements_met = false;
-	dev_priv->pc8.gpu_idle = false;
 	dev_priv->pc8.irqs_disabled = false;
 	dev_priv->pc8.enabled = false;
-	dev_priv->pc8.disable_count = 2; /* requirements_met + gpu_idle */
+	dev_priv->pc8.disable_count = 1; /* requirements_met */
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev_priv->pc8.enable_work, hsw_enable_pc8_work);
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev_priv->rps.delayed_resume_work,
 			  intel_gen6_powersave_work);
-- 
1.8.5.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-21 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-21 16:52 [PATCH 00/11] Runtime PM fixes Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-21 16:52 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Accurately track when we mark the hardware as idle/busy Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-21 16:55   ` Chris Wilson
2014-02-21 17:04     ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-21 17:27       ` Chris Wilson
2014-02-21 19:34         ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-05 13:13           ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-05 13:15             ` Chris Wilson
2014-02-21 16:52 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: put runtime PM only at the end of intel_mark_idle Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-21 17:28   ` Jesse Barnes
2014-03-05 13:14     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-02-21 16:52 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: put runtime PM only when we actually release force_wake Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-21 17:34   ` Jesse Barnes
2014-02-21 20:08     ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-21 20:16       ` Jesse Barnes
2014-02-21 20:58         ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-05 13:17         ` Daniel Vetter
2014-02-21 16:52 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: get runtime PM at intel_set_mode Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-21 17:35   ` Jesse Barnes
2014-02-24 11:23   ` Imre Deak
2014-02-24 14:34     ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-28 13:07       ` Imre Deak
2014-03-05 13:25   ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-06 16:30     ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-21 16:52 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: get runtime PM while trying to detect CRT Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-21 17:37   ` Jesse Barnes
2014-02-24 11:33   ` Imre Deak
2014-02-24 14:36     ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-21 16:52 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: get/put runtime PM in more places at i915_debugfs.c Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-21 17:41   ` Jesse Barnes
2014-02-21 17:46     ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-05 13:29       ` Daniel Vetter
2014-02-21 16:52 ` Paulo Zanoni [this message]
2014-02-28 13:50   ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: kill dev_priv->pc8.gpu_idle Imre Deak
2014-02-28 20:11     ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-03-05 13:31       ` Daniel Vetter
2014-02-21 16:52 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: call assert_device_not_suspended at gen6_force_wake_work Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-21 18:05   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-28 14:12     ` Imre Deak
2014-02-21 16:52 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: assert force wake is disabled when we runtime suspend Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-28 14:32   ` Imre Deak
2014-02-21 16:52 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: don't get/put runtime PM at the debugfs forcewake file Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-28 14:34   ` Imre Deak
2014-03-05 13:41   ` Daniel Vetter
2014-02-21 16:52 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: assert we're not runtime suspended when writing registers Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-28 15:16   ` Imre Deak
2014-03-05 13:44     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-03-05 13:46       ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1393001548-2883-8-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com \
    --to=przanoni@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox