public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
To: Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>,
	Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise
Date: Wed,  7 May 2014 10:26:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1399483626-7540-2-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399483626-7540-1-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>

With the ring mask we now have an easy way to know the number of rings
in the system, and therefore can accurately predict the number of dwords
to emit for semaphore signalling. This was not possible (easily)
previously.

There should be no functional impact, simply fewer instructions emitted.

While we're here, simply do the round up to 2 instead of the fancier
rounding we did before, which rounding up per mbox, ie 4. This also
allows us to drop the unnecessary MI_NOOP, so not really 4, 3.

v2: Use 3 dwords instead of 4 (Ville)
Do the proper calculation to get the number of dwords to emit (Ville)
Conditionally set .sync_to when semaphores are enabled (Ville)

v3: Rebased on VCS2
Replace hweight_long with hweight32 (Ville)

v4: Pull out the accidentally squashed hunk from the next patch after
rebase (Daniel).

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 25 +++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index 40a7aa4..d211fbc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -666,24 +666,19 @@ static void render_ring_cleanup(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
 static int gen6_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller,
 		       unsigned int num_dwords)
 {
+#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 3
 	struct drm_device *dev = signaller->dev;
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 	struct intel_ring_buffer *useless;
-	int i, ret;
+	int i, ret, num_rings;
 
-	/* NB: In order to be able to do semaphore MBOX updates for varying
-	 * number of rings, it's easiest if we round up each individual update
-	 * to a multiple of 2 (since ring updates must always be a multiple of
-	 * 2) even though the actual update only requires 3 dwords.
-	 */
-#define MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS 4
-	if (i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev))
-		num_dwords += ((I915_NUM_RINGS-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS);
+	num_rings = hweight32(INTEL_INFO(dev)->ring_mask);
+	num_dwords += round_up((num_rings-1) * MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS, 2);
+#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS
 
 	ret = intel_ring_begin(signaller, num_dwords);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-#undef MBOX_UPDATE_DWORDS
 
 	for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) {
 		u32 mbox_reg = signaller->semaphore.mbox.signal[i];
@@ -691,15 +686,13 @@ static int gen6_signal(struct intel_ring_buffer *signaller,
 			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1));
 			intel_ring_emit(signaller, mbox_reg);
 			intel_ring_emit(signaller, signaller->outstanding_lazy_seqno);
-			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
-		} else {
-			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
-			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
-			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
-			intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
 		}
 	}
 
+	/* If num_dwords was rounded, make sure the tail pointer is correct */
+	if (num_rings % 2 == 0)
+		intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_NOOP);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.9.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-07 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-07 17:26 [PATCH 00/10] Semaphores again. Needs shepherd Ben Widawsky
2014-05-07 17:26 ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2014-05-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: gen specific ring init Ben Widawsky
2014-05-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore signal Ben Widawsky
2014-05-07 17:27 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/bdw: implement semaphore wait Ben Widawsky
2014-05-07 17:27 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: Implement MI decode for gen8 Ben Widawsky
2014-05-07 17:27 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: Extract semaphore error collection Ben Widawsky
2014-05-07 17:27 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/bdw: collect semaphore error state Ben Widawsky
2014-05-07 17:27 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: semaphore debugfs Ben Widawsky
2014-05-07 17:27 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/bdw: poll semaphores Ben Widawsky
2014-05-07 17:27 ` [PATCH 10/10] DONT_MERGE drm/i915: FORCE_RESTORE for gen8 semaphores Ben Widawsky
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-06-30 16:53 [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Make semaphore updates more precise Rodrigo Vivi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1399483626-7540-2-git-send-email-benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
    --to=benjamin.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox