From: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: flush delayed_resume_work when suspending
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:51:51 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1403905911-3859-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
It is possible that, by the time we run i915_drm_freeze(),
delayed_resume_work was already queued but did not run yet. If it
still didn't run after intel_runtime_pm_disable_interrupts(), by the
time it runs it will try to change the interrupt registers with the
interrupts already disabled, which will trigger a WARN. We can
reliably reproduce this with the pm_rpm system-suspend test case.
In order to avoid the problem, we have to flush the work before
disabling the interrupts. We could also cancel the work instead of
flushing it, but that would require us to put a runtime PM reference -
and any other resource we may need in the future - in case the work
was already queued, so I believe flushing the work is more
future-proof, although less efficient. But I can also change this part
if someone requests.
Another thing I tried was to move the intel_suspend_gt_powersave()
call to before intel_runtime_pm_disable_interrupts(), but since that
function needs to be called after the interrupts are already disabled,
due to dev_priv->rps.work, this strategy didn't work.
Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/system-suspend
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80517
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index e64547e..672694b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -524,6 +524,8 @@ static int i915_drm_freeze(struct drm_device *dev)
return error;
}
+ flush_delayed_work(&dev_priv->rps.delayed_resume_work);
+
intel_runtime_pm_disable_interrupts(dev);
dev_priv->enable_hotplug_processing = false;
--
2.0.0
next reply other threads:[~2014-06-27 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-27 21:51 Paulo Zanoni [this message]
2014-06-27 22:30 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: flush delayed_resume_work when suspending Rodrigo Vivi
2014-06-30 19:22 ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-06-30 19:54 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: cancel " Paulo Zanoni
2014-06-30 20:10 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: flush " Rodrigo Vivi
2014-07-01 14:49 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1403905911-3859-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com \
--to=przanoni@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox