From: Thomas Daniel <thomas.daniel@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 21/43] drm/i915/bdw: Emission of requests with logical rings
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 17:04:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1406217891-8912-22-git-send-email-thomas.daniel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406217891-8912-1-git-send-email-thomas.daniel@intel.com>
From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
On a previous iteration of this patch, I created an Execlists
version of __i915_add_request and asbtracted it away as a
vfunc. Daniel Vetter wondered then why that was needed:
"with the clean split in command submission I expect every
function to know wether it'll submit to an lrc (everything in
intel_lrc.c) or wether it'll submit to a legacy ring (existing
code), so I don't see a need for an add_request vfunc."
The honest, hairy truth is that this patch is the glue keeping
the whole logical ring puzzle together:
- i915_add_request is used by intel_ring_idle, which in turn is
used by i915_gpu_idle, which in turn is used in several places
inside the eviction and gtt codes.
- Also, it is used by i915_gem_check_olr, which is littered all
over i915_gem.c
- ...
If I were to duplicate all the code that directly or indirectly
uses __i915_add_request, I'll end up creating a separate driver.
To show the differences between the existing legacy version and
the new Execlists one, this time I have special-cased
__i915_add_request instead of adding an add_request vfunc. I
hope this helps to untangle this Gordian knot.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 30 +++++++++++++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 9560b40..1c83b9c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2327,10 +2327,21 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
+ struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf;
u32 request_ring_position, request_start;
int ret;
- request_start = intel_ring_get_tail(ring->buffer);
+ request = ring->preallocated_lazy_request;
+ if (WARN_ON(request == NULL))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ if (i915.enable_execlists) {
+ struct intel_context *ctx = request->ctx;
+ ringbuf = ctx->engine[ring->id].ringbuf;
+ } else
+ ringbuf = ring->buffer;
+
+ request_start = intel_ring_get_tail(ringbuf);
/*
* Emit any outstanding flushes - execbuf can fail to emit the flush
* after having emitted the batchbuffer command. Hence we need to fix
@@ -2338,24 +2349,32 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
* is that the flush _must_ happen before the next request, no matter
* what.
*/
- ret = intel_ring_flush_all_caches(ring);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- request = ring->preallocated_lazy_request;
- if (WARN_ON(request == NULL))
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (i915.enable_execlists) {
+ ret = logical_ring_flush_all_caches(ringbuf);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ } else {
+ ret = intel_ring_flush_all_caches(ring);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
/* Record the position of the start of the request so that
* should we detect the updated seqno part-way through the
* GPU processing the request, we never over-estimate the
* position of the head.
*/
- request_ring_position = intel_ring_get_tail(ring->buffer);
+ request_ring_position = intel_ring_get_tail(ringbuf);
- ret = ring->add_request(ring);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ if (i915.enable_execlists) {
+ ret = ring->emit_request(ringbuf);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ } else {
+ ret = ring->add_request(ring);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
request->seqno = intel_ring_get_seqno(ring);
request->ring = ring;
@@ -2370,12 +2389,14 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
*/
request->batch_obj = obj;
- /* Hold a reference to the current context so that we can inspect
- * it later in case a hangcheck error event fires.
- */
- request->ctx = ring->last_context;
- if (request->ctx)
- i915_gem_context_reference(request->ctx);
+ if (!i915.enable_execlists) {
+ /* Hold a reference to the current context so that we can inspect
+ * it later in case a hangcheck error event fires.
+ */
+ request->ctx = ring->last_context;
+ if (request->ctx)
+ i915_gem_context_reference(request->ctx);
+ }
request->emitted_jiffies = jiffies;
list_add_tail(&request->list, &ring->request_list);
@@ -2630,6 +2651,7 @@ i915_gem_retire_requests_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
while (!list_empty(&ring->request_list)) {
struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
+ struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf;
request = list_first_entry(&ring->request_list,
struct drm_i915_gem_request,
@@ -2639,12 +2661,24 @@ i915_gem_retire_requests_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
break;
trace_i915_gem_request_retire(ring, request->seqno);
+
+ /* This is one of the few common intersection points
+ * between legacy ringbuffer submission and execlists:
+ * we need to tell them apart in order to find the correct
+ * ringbuffer to which the request belongs to.
+ */
+ if (i915.enable_execlists) {
+ struct intel_context *ctx = request->ctx;
+ ringbuf = ctx->engine[ring->id].ringbuf;
+ } else
+ ringbuf = ring->buffer;
+
/* We know the GPU must have read the request to have
* sent us the seqno + interrupt, so use the position
* of tail of the request to update the last known position
* of the GPU head.
*/
- ring->buffer->last_retired_head = request->tail;
+ ringbuf->last_retired_head = request->tail;
i915_gem_free_request(request);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 5dd63d6..dcf59c6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -106,6 +106,22 @@ void intel_logical_ring_stop(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
/* TODO */
}
+int logical_ring_flush_all_caches(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf)
+{
+ struct intel_engine_cs *ring = ringbuf->ring;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!ring->gpu_caches_dirty)
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = ring->emit_flush(ringbuf, 0, I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ring->gpu_caches_dirty = false;
+ return 0;
+}
+
void intel_logical_ring_advance_and_submit(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf)
{
intel_logical_ring_advance(ringbuf);
@@ -116,7 +132,8 @@ void intel_logical_ring_advance_and_submit(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf)
/* TODO: how to submit a context to the ELSP is not here yet */
}
-static int logical_ring_alloc_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
+static int logical_ring_alloc_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
+ struct intel_context *ctx)
{
if (ring->outstanding_lazy_seqno)
return 0;
@@ -128,6 +145,13 @@ static int logical_ring_alloc_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
if (request == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
+ /* Hold a reference to the context this request belongs to
+ * (we will need it when the time comes to emit/retire the
+ * request).
+ */
+ request->ctx = ctx;
+ i915_gem_context_reference(request->ctx);
+
ring->preallocated_lazy_request = request;
}
@@ -165,8 +189,6 @@ static int logical_ring_wait_request(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf, int bytes
if (ret)
return ret;
- /* TODO: make sure we update the right ringbuffer's last_retired_head
- * when retiring requests */
i915_gem_retire_requests_ring(ring);
ringbuf->head = ringbuf->last_retired_head;
ringbuf->last_retired_head = -1;
@@ -291,7 +313,7 @@ int intel_logical_ring_begin(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf, int num_dwords)
return ret;
/* Preallocate the olr before touching the ring */
- ret = logical_ring_alloc_seqno(ring);
+ ret = logical_ring_alloc_seqno(ring, ringbuf->ctx);
if (ret)
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
index 16798b6..696e09e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ void intel_logical_ring_stop(struct intel_engine_cs *ring);
void intel_logical_ring_cleanup(struct intel_engine_cs *ring);
int intel_logical_rings_init(struct drm_device *dev);
+int logical_ring_flush_all_caches(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf);
void intel_logical_ring_advance_and_submit(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf);
static inline void intel_logical_ring_advance(struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf)
{
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-24 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 137+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-24 16:04 [PATCH 00/43] Execlists v5 Thomas Daniel
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 01/43] drm/i915: Reorder the actual workload submission so that args checking is done earlier Thomas Daniel
2014-07-25 8:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-25 9:16 ` Chris Wilson
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 02/43] drm/i915/bdw: New source and header file for LRs, LRCs and Execlists Thomas Daniel
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 03/43] drm/i915/bdw: Macro for LRCs and module option for Execlists Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 13:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 04/43] drm/i915/bdw: Initialization for Logical Ring Contexts Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 14:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 05/43] drm/i915/bdw: Introduce one context backing object per engine Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 13:59 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: WARN if module opt sanitization goes out of order Daniel Vetter
2014-08-11 14:28 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 06/43] drm/i915/bdw: A bit more advanced LR context alloc/free Thomas Daniel
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 07/43] drm/i915/bdw: Allocate ringbuffers for Logical Ring Contexts Thomas Daniel
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 08/43] drm/i915/bdw: Add a context and an engine pointers to the ringbuffer Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 14:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-11 14:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-13 13:34 ` Daniel, Thomas
2014-08-13 15:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-14 15:09 ` Daniel, Thomas
2014-08-14 15:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-14 15:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-14 15:56 ` Daniel, Thomas
2014-08-14 16:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-14 16:27 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Add temporary ring->ctx backpointer Daniel Vetter
2014-08-14 16:33 ` Daniel, Thomas
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 09/43] drm/i915/bdw: Populate LR contexts (somewhat) Thomas Daniel
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 10/43] drm/i915/bdw: Deferred creation of user-created LRCs Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 14:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 11/43] drm/i915/bdw: Render moot context reset and switch with Execlists Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 14:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-15 10:22 ` Daniel, Thomas
2014-08-15 15:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-20 15:29 ` [PATCH] " Thomas Daniel
2014-08-20 15:36 ` Chris Wilson
2014-08-25 20:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-25 22:01 ` Scot Doyle
2014-08-26 5:59 ` Chris Wilson
2014-08-26 13:54 ` Siluvery, Arun
2014-08-26 14:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 12/43] drm/i915/bdw: Don't write PDP in the legacy way when using LRCs Thomas Daniel
2014-08-01 13:46 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-08-07 12:17 ` Thomas Daniel
2014-08-08 15:59 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-08-11 14:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-15 11:01 ` [PATCH] " Thomas Daniel
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 13/43] drm/i915: Abstract the legacy workload submission mechanism away Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 14:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-11 14:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-11 14:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-11 15:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 14/43] drm/i915/bdw: Skeleton for the new logical rings submission path Thomas Daniel
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 15/43] drm/i915/bdw: Generic logical ring init and cleanup Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 15:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 16/43] drm/i915/bdw: GEN-specific logical ring init Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 15:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 17/43] drm/i915/bdw: GEN-specific logical ring set/get seqno Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 15:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 18/43] drm/i915/bdw: New logical ring submission mechanism Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 20:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 19/43] drm/i915/bdw: GEN-specific logical ring emit request Thomas Daniel
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 20/43] drm/i915/bdw: GEN-specific logical ring emit flush Thomas Daniel
2014-07-24 16:04 ` Thomas Daniel [this message]
2014-08-11 20:56 ` [PATCH 21/43] drm/i915/bdw: Emission of requests with logical rings Daniel Vetter
2014-08-13 13:34 ` Daniel, Thomas
2014-08-13 15:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 22/43] drm/i915/bdw: Ring idle and stop " Thomas Daniel
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 23/43] drm/i915/bdw: Interrupts " Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 21:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-11 21:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 24/43] drm/i915/bdw: GEN-specific logical ring emit batchbuffer start Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 21:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-11 21:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 25/43] drm/i915/bdw: Workload submission mechanism for Execlists Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 20:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 26/43] drm/i915/bdw: Always use MMIO flips with Execlists Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 20:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 27/43] drm/i915/bdw: Render state init for Execlists Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 21:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-13 15:07 ` Daniel, Thomas
2014-08-13 15:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-14 20:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-15 8:43 ` Daniel, Thomas
2014-08-20 15:55 ` Daniel, Thomas
2014-08-25 20:55 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-21 10:40 ` [PATCH] " Thomas Daniel
2014-08-28 9:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 28/43] drm/i915/bdw: Implement context switching (somewhat) Thomas Daniel
2014-08-11 21:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 29/43] drm/i915/bdw: Write the tail pointer, LRC style Thomas Daniel
2014-08-01 14:33 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-08-11 21:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 30/43] drm/i915/bdw: Two-stage execlist submit process Thomas Daniel
2014-08-14 20:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-14 20:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-15 8:51 ` Daniel, Thomas
2014-08-15 9:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 31/43] drm/i915/bdw: Handle context switch events Thomas Daniel
2014-08-14 20:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-14 20:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-14 20:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-14 20:37 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 32/43] drm/i915/bdw: Avoid non-lite-restore preemptions Thomas Daniel
2014-08-14 20:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 33/43] drm/i915/bdw: Help out the ctx switch interrupt handler Thomas Daniel
2014-08-14 20:43 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 34/43] drm/i915/bdw: Make sure gpu reset still works with Execlists Thomas Daniel
2014-08-01 14:42 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-08-06 9:26 ` Daniel, Thomas
2014-08-01 14:46 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-08-06 9:28 ` Daniel, Thomas
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 35/43] drm/i915/bdw: Make sure error capture keeps working " Thomas Daniel
2014-08-15 12:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-21 10:57 ` Daniel, Thomas
2014-08-25 21:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-08-25 21:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 36/43] drm/i915/bdw: Disable semaphores for Execlists Thomas Daniel
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 37/43] drm/i915/bdw: Display execlists info in debugfs Thomas Daniel
2014-08-01 14:54 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-08-07 12:23 ` Thomas Daniel
2014-08-08 16:02 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 38/43] drm/i915/bdw: Display context backing obj & ringbuffer " Thomas Daniel
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 39/43] drm/i915/bdw: Print context state " Thomas Daniel
2014-08-01 15:54 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-08-07 12:24 ` Thomas Daniel
2014-08-08 15:57 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 40/43] drm/i915/bdw: Document Logical Rings, LR contexts and Execlists Thomas Daniel
2014-08-15 12:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 41/43] drm/i915/bdw: Enable Logical Ring Contexts (hence, Execlists) Thomas Daniel
2014-08-18 8:33 ` Jani Nikula
2014-08-18 14:52 ` Daniel, Thomas
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 42/43] drm/i915/bdw: Pin the context backing objects to GGTT on-demand Thomas Daniel
2014-08-15 13:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-07-24 16:04 ` [PATCH 43/43] drm/i915/bdw: Pin the ringbuffer backing object " Thomas Daniel
2014-07-25 8:35 ` [PATCH 00/43] Execlists v5 Daniel Vetter
2014-08-01 16:09 ` Damien Lespiau
2014-08-01 16:29 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1406217891-8912-22-git-send-email-thomas.daniel@intel.com \
--to=thomas.daniel@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox