From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Regression: audit: x86: drop arch from
 __audit_syscall_entry() interface
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:44:33 -0400
Message-ID: <1414017873.30946.105.camel@localhost>
References: <CA+gsUGSiXf2gpB8QQOQOmgxFc8mx31V6qeRqow6aXO1195jWEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1414002190.30946.95.camel@localhost>
 <alpine.DEB.2.11.1410222323500.5308@nanos>
 <1414013897.30946.102.camel@localhost> <544824F3.9000808@zytor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3B56E0F7
 for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <544824F3.9000808@zytor.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>, Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, x86@kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, linux-audit@redhat.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 14:43 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/22/2014 02:38 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
> > 
> > It was sent, numerous times, to the x86 list for reviews, and lived in
> > -next for 2 complete devel cycles without a complaint.  I'm trying to
> > get an i386 system to test a fix.  But yes, it's total crap.
> > 
> 
> You don't need an i386 system -- you can install an i386 distro on an
> x86-64 system, or in KVM.

So I might still be an idiot, because I still haven't gotten a working
kernel.  But I can't get Linus' latest not panic even without
CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL.  I kept blaming myself for not fixing this problem,
but reverting the patch like the reporter didn't give me bootable
kernels either.

I just jumped back in time and am looking to get anything I build to
boot...