public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: mask RPS IRQs properly when disabling RPS
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 18:42:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1417452128.11576.4.camel@intelbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+gsUGSPiao_eNxjuFm5gjn1GyN1Mkary3ahLdNJV_zBLsf5_g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 14:29 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2014-11-20 19:01 GMT-02:00 Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>:
> > Atm, igt/gem_reset_stats can trigger the recently added WARN on
> > left-over PM_IIR bits in gen6_enable_rps_interrupts(). There are two
> > reasons for this:
> > 1. we call intel_enable_gt_powersave() without a preceeding
> >    intel_disable_gt_powersave()
> > 2. gen6_disable_rps_interrupts() doesn't mask interrupts in PM_IMR
> 
> We don't do this, but we mask stuff through GEN6_PMINTRMSK. Shouldn't
> this be enough to prevent IIR from changing?

Note also, that during a subsequent RPS enabling, interrupts will be
unmasked in GEN6_PMINTRMSK, before calling gen6_enable_rps_interrupts().
So not masking the interrupts in PM_IMR here would lead to triggering
RPS interrupts before we explicitly enable them.

> 
> Chris?
> 
> >
> > 1. means RPS interrupts will remain enabled and can be serviced during
> > the HW initialization after a GPU reset. 2. means even if we called
> > gen6_disable_rps_interrupts() any new RPS interrupt during RPS
> > initialization would still propagate to PM_IIR too early (though
> > wouldn't be serviced).
> >
> > This patch solves the 2. issue by also masking interrupts in PM_IMR, the
> > following patch fixes 1. getting rid of the WARN. This also makes
> > intel_enable_gt_powersave() and intel_disable_gt_powersave() more
> > symmetric.
> >
> > Since gen6_disable_rps_interrupts() is called during driver loading with
> > i915 interrupts disabled add a new version of gen6_disable_pm_irq() that
> > doesn't WARN for this.
> >
> > Also while at it, get the irq_lock around the whole PM_IMR/IER/IIR
> > programming sequence and make sure that any queued PM_IIR bit is also
> > cleared.
> >
> > The WARN was caught by PRTS after I sent my previous RPS sanitizing
> > patchset and I could easily reproduce it on HSW. To actually fix it we
> > also need the next patch.
> >
> > Reported-by: He, Shuang <shuang.he@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > index 8d169e1..598e9689 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > @@ -231,9 +231,6 @@ static void snb_update_pm_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >
> >         assert_spin_locked(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> >
> > -       if (WARN_ON(!intel_irqs_enabled(dev_priv)))
> > -               return;
> > -
> >         new_val = dev_priv->pm_irq_mask;
> >         new_val &= ~interrupt_mask;
> >         new_val |= (~enabled_irq_mask & interrupt_mask);
> > @@ -247,14 +244,26 @@ static void snb_update_pm_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >
> >  void gen6_enable_pm_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, uint32_t mask)
> >  {
> > +       if (WARN_ON(!intel_irqs_enabled(dev_priv)))
> > +               return;
> > +
> >         snb_update_pm_irq(dev_priv, mask, mask);
> >  }
> >
> > -void gen6_disable_pm_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, uint32_t mask)
> > +static void __gen6_disable_pm_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +                                 uint32_t mask)
> >  {
> >         snb_update_pm_irq(dev_priv, mask, 0);
> >  }
> >
> > +void gen6_disable_pm_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, uint32_t mask)
> > +{
> > +       if (WARN_ON(!intel_irqs_enabled(dev_priv)))
> > +               return;
> > +
> > +       __gen6_disable_pm_irq(dev_priv, mask);
> > +}
> > +
> >  void gen6_reset_rps_interrupts(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  {
> >         struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > @@ -289,16 +298,20 @@ void gen6_disable_rps_interrupts(struct drm_device *dev)
> >
> >         cancel_work_sync(&dev_priv->rps.work);
> >
> > +       spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> > +
> >         I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->gen >= 8 ?
> >                    ~GEN8_PMINTR_REDIRECT_TO_NON_DISP : ~0);
> > +
> > +       __gen6_disable_pm_irq(dev_priv, dev_priv->pm_rps_events);
> >         I915_WRITE(gen6_pm_ier(dev_priv), I915_READ(gen6_pm_ier(dev_priv)) &
> >                                 ~dev_priv->pm_rps_events);
> > +       I915_WRITE(gen6_pm_iir(dev_priv), dev_priv->pm_rps_events);
> > +       I915_WRITE(gen6_pm_iir(dev_priv), dev_priv->pm_rps_events);
> >
> > -       spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> >         dev_priv->rps.pm_iir = 0;
> > +
> >         spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> > -
> > -       I915_WRITE(gen6_pm_iir(dev_priv), dev_priv->pm_rps_events);
> >  }
> >
> >  /**
> > --
> > 1.8.4
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-12-01 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-20 21:01 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: mask RPS IRQs properly when disabling RPS Imre Deak
2014-11-20 21:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: sanitize RPS resetting during GPU reset Imre Deak
2014-11-22 23:17   ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: sanitize RPS resetting during GPU shuang.he
2014-11-27 11:08   ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: sanitize RPS resetting during GPU reset Imre Deak
2014-11-27 19:07     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-11-27 19:26       ` Imre Deak
2014-12-01 17:35   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-12-01 16:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: mask RPS IRQs properly when disabling RPS Paulo Zanoni
2014-12-01 16:34   ` Chris Wilson
2014-12-01 16:47     ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-12-01 17:13       ` Imre Deak
2014-12-01 17:26       ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-01 16:42   ` Imre Deak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1417452128.11576.4.camel@intelbox \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=przanoni@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox